Image standards in Tissue-Based Diagnosis (Diagnostic Surgical Pathology)

UICC-TPCC, Institute of Pathology, Charite, Berlin, Germany.
Diagnostic Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.41). 02/2008; 3:17. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-3-17
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Progress in automated image analysis, virtual microscopy, hospital information systems, and interdisciplinary data exchange require image standards to be applied in tissue-based diagnosis.
To describe the theoretical background, practical experiences and comparable solutions in other medical fields to promote image standards applicable for diagnostic pathology. THEORY AND EXPERIENCES: Images used in tissue-based diagnosis present with pathology-specific characteristics. It seems appropriate to discuss their characteristics and potential standardization in relation to the levels of hierarchy in which they appear. All levels can be divided into legal, medical, and technological properties. Standards applied to the first level include regulations or aims to be fulfilled. In legal properties, they have to regulate features of privacy, image documentation, transmission, and presentation; in medical properties, features of disease-image combination, human-diagnostics, automated information extraction, archive retrieval and access; and in technological properties features of image acquisition, display, formats, transfer speed, safety, and system dynamics. The next lower second level has to implement the prescriptions of the upper one, i.e. describe how they are implemented. Legal aspects should demand secure encryption for privacy of all patient related data, image archives that include all images used for diagnostics for a period of 10 years at minimum, accurate annotations of dates and viewing, and precise hardware and software information. Medical aspects should demand standardized patients' files such as DICOM 3 or HL 7 including history and previous examinations, information of image display hardware and software, of image resolution and fields of view, of relation between sizes of biological objects and image sizes, and of access to archives and retrieval. Technological aspects should deal with image acquisition systems (resolution, colour temperature, focus, brightness, and quality evaluation procedures), display resolution data, implemented image formats, storage, cycle frequency, backup procedures, operation system, and external system accessibility. The lowest third level describes the permitted limits and threshold in detail. At present, an applicable standard including all mentioned features does not exist to our knowledge; some aspects can be taken from radiological standards (PACS, DICOM 3); others require specific solutions or are not covered yet.
The progress in virtual microscopy and application of artificial intelligence (AI) in tissue-based diagnosis demands fast preparation and implementation of an internationally acceptable standard. The described hierarchic order as well as analytic investigation in all potentially necessary aspects and details offers an appropriate tool to specifically determine standardized requirements.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use of optical imaging for medical and scientific applications requires accurate quantification of features such as object size, color, and brightness. High pixel density cameras available on modern mobile phones have made photography simple and convenient for consumer applications; however, the camera hardware and software that enables this simplicity can present a barrier to accurate quantification of image data. This issue is exacerbated by automated settings, proprietary image processing algorithms, rapid phone evolution, and the diversity of manufacturers. If mobile phone cameras are to live up to their potential to increase access to healthcare in low-resource settings, limitations of mobile phone-based imaging must be fully understood and addressed with procedures that minimize their effects on image quantification. Here we focus on microscopic optical imaging using a custom mobile phone microscope that is compatible with phones from multiple manufacturers. We demonstrate that quantitative microscopy with micron-scale spatial resolution can be carried out with multiple phones and that image linearity, distortion, and color can be corrected as needed. Using all versions of the iPhone and a selection of Android phones released between 2007 and 2012, we show that phones with greater than 5 MP are capable of nearly diffraction-limited resolution over a broad range of magnifications, including those relevant for single cell imaging. We find that automatic focus, exposure, and color gain standard on mobile phones can degrade image resolution and reduce accuracy of color capture if uncorrected, and we devise procedures to avoid these barriers to quantitative imaging. By accommodating the differences between mobile phone cameras and the scientific cameras, mobile phone microscopes can be reliably used to increase access to quantitative imaging for a variety of medical and scientific applications.
    PLoS ONE 05/2014; 9(5):e96906. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0096906 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Content-based image retrieval methods aid physicians in diagnosing the early detection of diabetic retinopathy for preventing blindness. In this work, the combination of two dimensional dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT) and generalized Gaussian density (GGD) model is used for feature extraction. Kull-back Leibler Divergence (KLD) computes the similarity measure between two feature set. Experimental dataset includes 1200 images from MESSIDOR database. The mean precision rates at five retrieved images are obtained as 78.23% and 53.70% for Macular Edema and Retinopathy classes, respectively. Results are promising and give an indication that the dual-tree complex wavelet transform is efficient for content-based retinal image retrieval problem.
    Signal Processing Image Processing & Pattern Recognition (ICSIPR), 2013 International Conference on; 01/2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ähnlich wie die digitalen Verfahren die radiologische Bildgebung revolutioniert haben, wird die virtuelle Mikroskopie die Pathologie verändern. Dies gilt im besonderen Maße auch für die onkologische Diagnostik. Die Digitalisierung wird nicht nur die arbeitsteilige Kooperation der Pathologen vereinfachen und beschleunigen, sondern auch durch die verstärkte Nutzung quantitativer Methoden bei der Einschätzung morphologischer Veränderungen zu geringerer Variabilität und größerer Reproduzierbarkeit verhelfen. Die virtuelle Mikroskopie ermöglicht den Pathologen eine noch aktivere und unmittelbarere Teilnahme an interdisziplinären Tumorkonferenzen. Abstract Virtual microscopy will revolutionize pathology similar to the changes in radiological imaging by digitization and this holds especially true for oncological diagnostics. The digitization will simplify and speed up cooperation among pathologists. The intensified use of quantitative methods for the assessment of morphological changes will lead to less variability and increased reproducibility. Virtual microscopy offers pathologists the opportunity to take part in interdisciplinary tumor boards in a more active and direct manner.
    Der Onkologe 05/2012; 18(5):409-418. DOI:10.1007/s00761-012-2233-y · 0.13 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014