Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder.

War-Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA.
American journal of epidemiology (Impact Factor: 4.98). 07/2008; 167(12):1446-52. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn068
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A cross-sectional study of military personnel following deployment to conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan ascertained histories of combat theater injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and current prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and postconcussive symptoms. Associations among injuries, PTSD, and postconcussive symptoms were explored. In February 2005, a postal survey was sent to Iraq/Afghanistan veterans who had left combat theaters by September 2004 and lived in Maryland; Washington, DC; northern Virginia; and eastern West Virginia. Immediate neurologic symptoms postinjury were used to identify mild TBI. Adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed by using Poisson regression. About 12% of 2,235 respondents reported a history consistent with mild TBI, and 11% screened positive for PTSD. Mild TBI history was common among veterans injured by bullets/shrapnel, blasts, motor vehicle crashes, air/water transport, and falls. Factors associated with PTSD included reporting multiple injury mechanisms (prevalence ratio = 3.71 for three or more mechanisms, 95% confidence interval: 2.23, 6.19) and combat mild TBI (prevalence ratio = 2.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.72, 3.28). The strongest factor associated with postconcussive symptoms was PTSD, even after overlapping symptoms were removed from the PTSD score (prevalence ratio = 3.79, 95% confidence interval: 2.57, 5.59).

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the factors that influence veterans' functional outcome after deployment is critical to provide appropriately targeted care. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been related to disability, but other psychiatric and behavioral conditions are not as well examined. We investigated the impact of deployment-related psychiatric and behavioral conditions on disability among 255 OEF/OIF/OND service members and veterans. Structured clinical interviews assessed TBI and the psychiatric conditions of depression, PTSD, anxiety, and substance use. Self-report questionnaires assessed disability and the behavioral conditions of sleep disturbance and pain. Over 90% of participants had a psychiatric and/or behavioral condition, with approximately half presenting with ≥ 3 conditions. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 4 clinically relevant psychiatric and behavioral factors which accounted for 76.9% of the variance: (a) depression, PTSD, and military mTBI (deployment trauma factor); (b) pain and sleep (somatic factor); (c) anxiety disorders, other than PTSD (anxiety factor); and (d) substance abuse or dependence (substance use factor). Individuals with the conditions comprising the deployment trauma factor were more likely to be substantially disabled than individuals with depression and PTSD, but no military mTBI, OR = 3.52; 95% CI [1.09, 11.37]. Depression, PTSD, and a history of military mTBI may comprise an especially harmful combination associated with high risk for substantial disability. Published 2015. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
    Journal of Traumatic Stress 02/2015; 28(1). DOI:10.1002/jts.21979 · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study was designed to validate the ability of our recently identified set of small noncoding RNA candidate mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) biomarkers to diagnose mTBI in the presence or absence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comorbidity. Using qPCR, we explored the regulation of the candidate biomarkers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 58 veterans. We confirmed that 4 small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), ACA48, U35, U55, and U83A, are significantly down-regulated in PBMC from veterans with mTBI and PTSD compared to non-TBI, control subjects with PTSD only. We found that the snoRNA biomarkers are able to dissect subjects with comorbid mTBI and PTSD from PTSD subjects without mTBI with 100% sensitivity, 81% accuracy, and 72% specificity. No significant differential expression of snoRNA biomarkers was found in mTBI subjects without comorbid PTSD. However, we found significantly lower U55 contents in subjects with PTSD. We explored the regulation of ACA48 in rodent models of PTSD or blast-induced mTBI to gather proof-of-concept evidence that would connect the regulation of the biomarkers and the development of mTBI or PTSD. We found no change in the regulation of ACA48 in the mTBI rat model. We did, however, find significant down-regulation of ACA48 in the PTSD mouse model 24 hours following psychological trauma exposure. This may reflect a short-term response to trauma exposure, since we found no change in the regulation of ACA48 in veteran PTSD subjects 3.6 years post-deployment. Additional application of the 4 snoRNA biomarker to current diagnostic criteria may provide an objective biomarker pattern to help identify veterans with comorbid mTBI and PTSD. Our observations suggest that biological interactions between TBI and PTSD may contribute to the clinical features of veterans with comorbid mTBI and PTSD. Future investigations on mTBI mechanisms or TBI biomarkers should consider their interactions with PTSD.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study demonstrates a novel model generation methodology that addresses several limitations of conventional finite element head models (FEHM). By operating chiefly in image space, new structures can be incorporated or merged, and the mesh either decimated or refined both locally and globally. This methodology is employed in the development of a highly bio-fidelic FEHM from high-resolution scan data. The model is adaptable and presented here in a form optimised for impact and blast simulations. The accuracy and feasibility of the model are successfully demonstrated against a widely used experimental benchmark in impact loading and through the investigation of potential brain injury under blast overpressure loading.
    Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 01/2015; DOI:10.1080/10255842.2014.994118 · 1.79 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014