Article

Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Wd 14, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK, LE1 5WW.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 5.94). 02/2008; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004576.pub2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Approximately a third of all fractures in children occur at the wrist, usually from falling onto an outstretched hand.
We aimed to evaluate removable splintage versus plaster casts (requiring removal by a specialist) for undisplaced compression (buckle) fractures; cast length and position; and the role of surgical fixation for displaced wrist fractures in children.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (October 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1988), CINAHL (from 1982) and reference lists of articles. Date of last search October 2007.
Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing types and position of casts and the use of surgical fixation for distal radius fractures in children.
Two authors performed trial selection. All three authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data.
The 10 included trials, involving 827 children, were of variable quality.Four trials compared removable splintage versus the traditional below-elbow cast in children with buckle fractures. There was no short-term deformity recorded in all four trials and, in one trial, no refracture at six months. The Futura splint was cheaper to use; a removable plaster splint was less restrictive to wear enabling more children to bathe and participate in other activities, and the option preferred by children and parents; the soft bandage was more comfortable, convenient and less painful to wear; home-removable plaster casts removed by parents did not result in significant differences in outcome but were strongly favoured by parents. Two trials found below-elbow versus above-elbow casts did not increase redisplacement of reduced fractures or cast-related complications, were less restrictive during use and avoided elbow stiffness. One trial evaluating the effect of arm position in above-elbow casts found no effect on deformity. Three trials found that percutaneous wiring significantly reduced redisplacement and remanipulation but one of these found no advantage in function at three months.
Limited evidence supports the use of removable splintage for buckle fractures and challenges the traditional use of above-elbow casts after reduction of displaced fractures. Although percutaneous wire fixation prevents redisplacement, the effects on longer term outcomes including function are not established. Further research is warranted on the optimum approach, including splintage, for buckle fractures; and on the use of below-elbow casts and indications for surgery for displaced wrist fractures in children.

1 Bookmark
 · 
201 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Frakturen des distalen Radius sind im Wachstumsalter die häufigsten Bruchverletzungen der langen Röhrenknochen. Unfallursache sind oft Sport und Spiel. Einen eigentlichen Altersgipfel gibt es nicht. Es handelt sich fast ausschließlich um metaphysäre Verletzungen (einschließlich der Wachstumsfugenlösungen), Gelenk beteiligende, epiphysäre Frakturen sind die Ausnahme. Alle typischen Frakturformen des Wachstumsalters kommen vor. Das Potenzial wachstumsassoziierter Spontankorrekturen ist hoch und hält sogar noch nach dem 10. Lebensjahr an. Das Behandlungsspektrum reicht von der rein konservativen Behandlung über die Redression (Gipskeilung) und Reposition bis zur perkutanen Kirschner-Draht-Spickung. Eine offene Reposition metaphysärer Frakturen ist nur selten notwendig. Probleme kann die Stabilisierung weiter proximal gelegener Frakturen am metadiaphysären Übergang bereiten. Hemmende Wachstumsstörungen als Folge eines vorzeitigen Verschlusses der Wachstumsfuge mit nachhaltigen Folgen sind sehr selten, bedürfen dann aber eines differenzierten Therapiekonzepts.
    Trauma und Berufskrankheit 02/2014; 14(4). DOI:10.1007/s10039-012-1906-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diaphyseal forearm fractures in children are common injuries, the vast majority of which are treated conservatively. There is a need to assess the role of modifiable factors such as techniques of reduction and casting in order to optimise functional recovery. To assess the effects of different conservative interventions for diaphyseal forearm fractures in children, including adolescents. We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (to November 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2012 Issue 11), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2012), EMBASE (1980 to November 2012), CINAHL (1982 to November 2012), trial registries (to November 2012), conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. Randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing conservative interventions for diaphyseal forearm fractures in children were eligible for inclusion. Two review authors independently examined search results to identify eligible trials. After screening 493 citations, 17 potentially eligible studies were identified. Of these 13 studies were excluded, two studies, both reported incompletely in conference abstracts only, await assessment and two are ongoing trials whose recruitment status is unknown. This review found no usable evidence from randomised trials to make recommendations concerning different conservative interventions for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm bones in children. Publication in full of trials that have already been performed on this topic would be a useful start to changing this unsatisfactory situation.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 01/2013; 4(4):CD008775. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008775.pub2 · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Lack of standardization of outcome measurement has hampered an evidence-based approach to clinical practice and research. METHODS: We adopted a process of reviewing evidence on current use of measures and appropriate theoretical frameworks for health and disability to inform a consensus process that was focused on deriving the minimal set of core domains in distal radius fracture. RESULTS: We agreed on the following seven core recommendations: (1) pain and function were regarded as the primary domains, (2) very brief measures were needed for routine administration in clinical practice, (3) these brief measures could be augmented by additional measures that provide more detail or address additional domains for clinical research, (4) measurement of pain should include measures of both intensity and frequency as core attributes, (5) a numeric pain scale, e.g. visual analogue scale or visual numeric scale or the pain subscale of the patient-reported wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires were identified as reliable, valid and feasible measures to measure these concepts, (6) for function, either the Quick Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire or PRWE-function subscale was identified as reliable, valid and feasible measures, and (7) a measure of participation and treatment complications should be considered core outcomes for both clinical practice and research. CONCLUSION: We used a sound methodological approach to form a comprehensive foundation of content for outcomes in the area of distal radius fractures. We recommend the use of symptom and function as separate domains in the ICF core set in clinical research or practice for patients with wrist fracture. Further research is needed to provide more definitive measurement properties of measures across all domains.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 06/2013; DOI:10.1007/s00402-013-1767-9 · 1.36 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
2 Downloads