Article

Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Wd 14, Infirmary Square, Leicester, UK, LE1 5WW.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 5.94). 02/2008; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004576.pub2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Approximately a third of all fractures in children occur at the wrist, usually from falling onto an outstretched hand.
We aimed to evaluate removable splintage versus plaster casts (requiring removal by a specialist) for undisplaced compression (buckle) fractures; cast length and position; and the role of surgical fixation for displaced wrist fractures in children.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (October 2007), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1988), CINAHL (from 1982) and reference lists of articles. Date of last search October 2007.
Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing types and position of casts and the use of surgical fixation for distal radius fractures in children.
Two authors performed trial selection. All three authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data.
The 10 included trials, involving 827 children, were of variable quality.Four trials compared removable splintage versus the traditional below-elbow cast in children with buckle fractures. There was no short-term deformity recorded in all four trials and, in one trial, no refracture at six months. The Futura splint was cheaper to use; a removable plaster splint was less restrictive to wear enabling more children to bathe and participate in other activities, and the option preferred by children and parents; the soft bandage was more comfortable, convenient and less painful to wear; home-removable plaster casts removed by parents did not result in significant differences in outcome but were strongly favoured by parents. Two trials found below-elbow versus above-elbow casts did not increase redisplacement of reduced fractures or cast-related complications, were less restrictive during use and avoided elbow stiffness. One trial evaluating the effect of arm position in above-elbow casts found no effect on deformity. Three trials found that percutaneous wiring significantly reduced redisplacement and remanipulation but one of these found no advantage in function at three months.
Limited evidence supports the use of removable splintage for buckle fractures and challenges the traditional use of above-elbow casts after reduction of displaced fractures. Although percutaneous wire fixation prevents redisplacement, the effects on longer term outcomes including function are not established. Further research is warranted on the optimum approach, including splintage, for buckle fractures; and on the use of below-elbow casts and indications for surgery for displaced wrist fractures in children.

1 Follower
 · 
206 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The traditional treatment after closed reduction of distal radius (DR) and distal both bone (DBB) forearm fractures has been application of a long-arm cast (LAC) or a short-arm cast (SAC). Splinting is another option that avoids the potential complications associated with casting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the maintenance of reduction of DR or DBB fractures placed in a double-sugar-tong splint (DSTS) compared with a LAC in a pediatric population. This is an IRB-approved, prospective, randomized trial. Patients aged 4 to 12 years with DR or DBB fractures treated at a single institution between 2010 and 2012 were enrolled. After reduction, fractures were placed into either a LAC or a DSTS. Radiographs were reviewed at initial injury, postreduction, and at set intervals for angulation, displacement, and apposition, as well as cast index and 3-point index. The DSTS was overwrapped into a cast after week 1. The immobilization device was changed to a SAC at week 4 or 6. Total duration of immobilization was 6 to 8 weeks. Seventy-one patients were enrolled with 37 in the LAC and 34 in the DSTS. Average age was 8.73 years (range, 4 to 12) with 43 being males. There were 28 isolated DR and 43 DBB fractures. There were no week-to-week differences between the 2 groups in regards to sagittal alignment, coronal alignment, apposition, or displacement. Sagittal alignment at immediate postreduction and week 2 showed that the DSTS was slightly better (average 2.0 vs. 5.0 degrees, respectively, P=0.04). For the entire treatment period there was an increased risk of loss of reduction of ≥10 degrees in the LAC group versus the DSTS group (7 patients vs. 2 patients, respectively, P=0.0001), and of meeting the criteria for remanipulation (10 patients vs. 5 patients, respectively, P=0.01). At cast removal, there was no difference between groups. Although there were significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to risk of reduction loss, the DSTS and LAC were comparable in maintenance of reduction at the time of cast removal. Both the DSTS and LAC are appropriate immobilization devices for these pediatric fractures. Level II-prospective, comparative study.
    Journal of pediatric orthopedics 04/2014; DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000196 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evidence suggests that minor paediatric fractures can be followed by primary care paediatricians (PCPs).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Frakturen des distalen Radius sind im Wachstumsalter die häufigsten Bruchverletzungen der langen Röhrenknochen. Unfallursache sind oft Sport und Spiel. Einen eigentlichen Altersgipfel gibt es nicht. Es handelt sich fast ausschließlich um metaphysäre Verletzungen (einschließlich der Wachstumsfugenlösungen), Gelenk beteiligende, epiphysäre Frakturen sind die Ausnahme. Alle typischen Frakturformen des Wachstumsalters kommen vor. Das Potenzial wachstumsassoziierter Spontankorrekturen ist hoch und hält sogar noch nach dem 10. Lebensjahr an. Das Behandlungsspektrum reicht von der rein konservativen Behandlung über die Redression (Gipskeilung) und Reposition bis zur perkutanen Kirschner-Draht-Spickung. Eine offene Reposition metaphysärer Frakturen ist nur selten notwendig. Probleme kann die Stabilisierung weiter proximal gelegener Frakturen am metadiaphysären Übergang bereiten. Hemmende Wachstumsstörungen als Folge eines vorzeitigen Verschlusses der Wachstumsfuge mit nachhaltigen Folgen sind sehr selten, bedürfen dann aber eines differenzierten Therapiekonzepts.
    Trauma und Berufskrankheit 02/2014; 14(4). DOI:10.1007/s10039-012-1906-5

Preview

Download
5 Downloads