Article

Racial differences in expectations of joint replacement surgery outcomes.

Philadelphia VAMC, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4155, USA.
Arthritis & Rheumatology (Impact Factor: 7.87). 05/2008; 59(5):730-7. DOI: 10.1002/art.23565
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Prior studies have indicated racial differences in patients' expectations for joint replacement surgery outcomes. The goal of this study was to measure these differences using a well-validated survey instrument and to determine if the differences could be explained by racial variation in disease severity, socioeconomic factors, literacy, or trust.
Detailed demographic, clinical, psychological, and social data were collected from 909 male patients (450 African American, 459 white) ages 50-79 years with moderate or severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee receiving primary care at 2 veterans affairs medical centers. The previously validated Joint Replacement Expectations Survey was used to assess expectations for pain relief, functional improvement, and psychological well-being after joint replacement.
Among knee OA patients (n = 627), the unadjusted mean expectation score (scale 0-76) for African American patients was 48.7 versus 53.6 for white patients (mean difference 4.9, P < 0.001). For hip OA patients (n = 282), the unadjusted mean expectation score (scale 0-72) for African Americans was 45.4 versus 51.5 for whites (mean difference 6.1, P < 0.001). Multivariable adjustment for disease severity, socioeconomic factors, education, social support, literacy, and trust reduced these racial differences to 3.8 points (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2, 6.3) among knee OA patients and 4.2 points (95% CI 0.4, 8.0) among hip patients.
Among potential candidates for joint replacement, African American patients have significantly lower expectations for surgical outcomes than white patients. This difference is not entirely explained by racial differences in demographics, disease severity, education, income, social support, or trust.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
79 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To determine whether there are racial differences in social support among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and whether the impact of social support on patient preferences for total knee replacement (TKR) varies by race and sex. MethodsA total of 514 white and 285 African American patients with knee OA were surveyed. Logistic regression models were performed to determine if the relationship between willingness to undergo TKR and the interaction of patient race and sex was mediated by social support. ResultsCompared to whites with knee OA, African American patients were less likely to be married (P < 0.001), reported less close friends/relatives (P < 0.001), and had lower Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Scale (MOS-SSS) scores (P < 0.001). African American patients were also less willing to undergo TKR (62% versus 80%; P < 0.001) than whites. The odds of willingness to undergo TKR were less in white females compared to white males when adjusted for recruitment site, age, income, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34–0.96). This difference was no longer significant when further adjusted for marital status, number of close friends/relatives, and MOS-SSS score, but the effect size remained unchanged (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.35–1.02). The odds of willingness to undergo TKR remained much less in African American females (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.64) and African American males (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.54) compared to white males when controlled for sociodemographic, clinical, and social support measures. Conclusion African American patients reported less structural and functional social support than whites. Social support is an important determinant of preference for TKR surgery only among whites.
    Arthritis Care & Research. 07/2013; 65(7).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Using data from the community-based Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (JoCo OA), we examined race and gender variations in willingness to undergo, and perceptions regarding, total joint replacement (TJR). Methods: Analyses were conducted for the total sample who participated in a follow-up measurement period from 2006-2010 (n=1,522) and a subsample with symptomatic hip and / or knee osteoarthritis (sOA; n=445). Participants indicated how willing they would be to have TJR (hip or knee) if their doctor recommended it; responses were categorized as "definitely" or "probably" willing vs. "unsure," "probably not" or "definitely not" willing, or "don't know." Participants answered seven questions regarding perceptions of TJR outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models of willingness included participant characteristics (including socioeconomic status) and TJR perception variables that were associated with willingness at the p<0.1 level in bivariate analyses. Results: African Americans had lower odds of willingness to undergo TJR than Caucasians in the total sample (adjusted OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.44-0.74) and the sOA subsample (adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62). There were no gender differences in willingness. African Americans expected poorer TJR outcomes than Caucasians, but gender differences were minimal; perceptions of TJR outcomes were not significantly associated with willingness. Conclusions: In this community sample, racial differences in TJR willingness and perceptions were substantial, but gender differences were small. Perceptions of TJR did not appear to affect willingness or explain racial differences in willingness. © 2014 American College of Rheumatology.
    Arthritis care & research. 01/2014; 66(8).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this literature review was to examine factors relating to the perioperative experience of older persons undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery resulting from osteoarthritis. Method: A literature search was undertaken using databases CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to provide relevant research articles. Articles were included if they examined the factors relating to the HRQOL, QOL and perioperative experience of older persons undergoing joint replacement surgery resulting from osteoarthritis. The use of Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklist facilitated a systematic appraisal of studies with regard to the scientific rigor of the studies. Results: Twenty-two publications were categorized into one main theme: "factors relating to perioperative experience" subcategorized into eight subthemes: "waiting time", "pain and disability", "mental health", "race/ethnicity, age and gender", "body image", "coping and social support", "patient education" and "care continuity". Conclusion: There is a need to conduct further research to examine the perioperative experience of older persons undergoing joint replacement surgery, in particular, the lived perioperative experience of a diverse race, ethnicity and culture in an Asian population. Implications for Rehabilitation Healthcare services should remain focused on reducing waiting time as prolonged waiting time for joint replacement surgery was detrimental to patients' HRQOL. Healthcare professionals need to identify strategies to improve the perioperative pain experience through patient education on pain management and positive social support to support the process of recovery. Patients' expectations of pain and their process of recovery were closely linked to patient education. One model of patient education that was seen to be successful and linked to good post-operative outcomes was care continuity model. Being actively involved in the care continuity results in better post-operative outcomes for the patient and their family.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 04/2014; · 1.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
30 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014