A randomised study of the effects of letrozole and anastrozole on oestrogen receptor positive breast cancers in postmenopausal women.

Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (Impact Factor: 4.47). 04/2008; 114(3):495-501. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0027-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Changes in proliferation as measured by Ki67 occur within 14 days of starting treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and these changes have been shown to be predictors of long term outcome. This study aimed to compare changes in proliferation following 14 days of treatment with anastrozole and letrozole.
Two hundred and six women with 209 estrogen receptor (ER) positive operable breast cancers (three bilateral) were randomly allocated to receive either 14 days treatment with 2.5 mg of letrozole or 1 mg of anastrozole prior to surgery. Changes in expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) as assessed by ALLRED scores and proliferation as assessed by Ki67 were analysed. The HER2 status of each tumour was also assessed using a combination of the Hercept test and FISH.
Both letrozole and anastrozole reduced ER expression (ALLRED score) by a mean of 0.32 (0.20-0.44), P<0.001 and PgR fell by a mean of 2.54 (2.20-2.89) P<0.0001. Letrozole reduced proliferation from a geometric mean of 6.37% to 0.81%, P<0.0001 and anastrozole reduced proliferation from 5.81% to 0.77%, P<0.0001. There was no differences between drugs in the fall in ER, PgR or proliferation. Both letrozole and anastrozole produced significant falls in proliferation in both HER2 positive and HER2 negative cancers, all P<0.001.
14 days of both letrozole and anastrozole reduces proliferation, ER and PgR expression. No significant difference between these two drugs was identified.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anastrozole and RU486 are shown to reduce hormone-responsive breast cancer progression when used as adjuvant treatments to surgical intervention, however, a high incidence of cancer recurrence remains. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and Mucin 1 (MUC1), a glycoprotein, are both implicated in breast cancer progression. We assessed whether Anastrozole and RU486 treatment affects the expression of, and relationship between, ERα and MUC1 in the ERα(+) MUC1(+) MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. MCF-7 cells, treated with physiological concentrations of either Anastrozole or RU486 for 18h or 72h, were subjected to immunolocalization of both markers. CellProfiler software was used to quantify intensity for statistical analyses. ERα expression increased at both time periods following treatment. MUC1 expression increased with RU486-treatment at both times, whereas Anastrozole induced increased MUC1 expression at 72h only. The biomarkers demonstrated increased point association at 72h within treatment groups despite MUC1 diverging from correlation with ERα. We propose that tumor progression is independent of MUC1 and ERα correlation. These preliminary results indicate that withdrawal of adjuvant treatment may result in residual cell populations expressing increased ERα and MUC1. This phenotype may allow enhanced estrogenic and metastatic capacity influencing cancer recurrence, a hypothesis we are investigating further.
    Acta histochemica 05/2013; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven to be superior to tamoxifen in terms of time to disease progression in patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+) status and, nowadays, are used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is a third generation AI, as are anastrozole and exemestane. In the past, clinical studies had demonstrated that letrozole was effective as a second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In this paper, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of letrozole are reviewed along with its activity in preclinical and clinical settings. Additionally, the results of important clinical trials such as Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98, which tested the optimal initial adjuvant endocrine treatment and the sequential therapy with letrozole and tamoxifen, MA-17 that evaluates the benefits of extended adjuvant therapy, and other important studies in advanced and neoadjuvant disease, are reviewed. Safety comparisons of treatments are also addressed. Interestingly, about 50% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers are HR+. However, HER2 positivity is a marker of antiestrogen treatment resistance. Because of this, a dual treatment is a logical approach when both receptors are overexpressed. The combination of lapatinib and letrozole leads to a significant improvement in the overall disease outcome. Also, the combination of everolimus plus letrozole has been tested in this setting. In fact, the coadministration of both agents seems to increase the efficacy of letrozole in newly-diagnosed HR+ patients. Once resistance to sequential trastuzumab and AI as monotherapy has been found, trastuzumab and letrozole combined in HR+ and HER2+ patients with advanced breast cancer can overcome resistance to both drugs administered as single agents, according to recently reported results.
    Advances in Therapy 11/2011; 28(12):1045-58. · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In breast cancer, immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation using the marker Ki67 has potential use in both research and clinical management. However, lack of consistency across laboratories has limited Ki67's value. A working group was assembled to devise a strategy to harmonize Ki67 analysis and increase scoring concordance. Toward that goal, we conducted a Ki67 reproducibility study. Eight laboratories received 100 breast cancer cases arranged into 1-mm core tissue microarrays-one set stained by the participating laboratory and one set stained by the central laboratory, both using antibody MIB-1. Each laboratory scored Ki67 as percentage of positively stained invasive tumor cells using its own method. Six laboratories repeated scoring of 50 locally stained cases on 3 different days. Sources of variation were analyzed using random effects models with log2-transformed measurements. Reproducibility was quantified by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the approximate two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the true intraclass correlation coefficients in these experiments were provided. Intralaboratory reproducibility was high (ICC = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.97). Interlaboratory reproducibility was only moderate (central staining: ICC = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.78; local staining: ICC = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.68). Geometric mean of Ki67 values for each laboratory across the 100 cases ranged 7.1% to 23.9% with central staining and 6.1% to 30.1% with local staining. Factors contributing to interlaboratory discordance included tumor region selection, counting method, and subjective assessment of staining positivity. Formal counting methods gave more consistent results than visual estimation. Substantial variability in Ki67 scoring was observed among some of the world's most experienced laboratories. Ki67 values and cutoffs for clinical decision-making cannot be transferred between laboratories without standardizing scoring methodology because analytical validity is limited.
    CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment 11/2013; · 14.07 Impact Factor


Available from

Similar Publications