Article

The genetic response to short-term interventions affecting cardiovascular function: Rationale and design of the Heredity and Phenotype Intervention (HAPI) Heart Study

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
American heart journal (Impact Factor: 4.56). 06/2008; 155(5):823-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The etiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is multifactorial. Efforts to identify genes influencing CVD risk have met with limited success to date, likely because of the small effect sizes of common CVD risk alleles and the presence of gene by gene and gene by environment interactions.
The HAPI Heart Study was initiated in 2002 to measure the cardiovascular response to 4 short-term interventions affecting cardiovascular risk factors and to identify the genetic and environmental determinants of these responses. The measurements included blood pressure responses to the cold pressor stress test and to a high salt diet, triglyceride excursion in response to a high-fat challenge, and response in platelet aggregation to aspirin therapy.
The interventions were carried out in 868 relatively healthy Amish adults from large families. The heritabilities of selected response traits for each intervention ranged from 8% to 38%, suggesting that some of the variation associated with response to each intervention can be attributed to the additive effects of genes.
Identifying these response genes may identify new mechanisms influencing CVD and may lead to individualized preventive strategies and improved early detection of high-risk individuals.

Full-text

Available from: Evadnie Rampersaud, May 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
163 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(NHDL) is an independent and superior predictor of CVD risk as compared to low-density lipoprotein alone. It represents a spectrum of atherogenic lipid fractions with possibly a distinct genomic signature. We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify loci influencing baseline NHDL and its postprandial lipemic (PPL) response. We carried out GWAS in 4,241 participants of European descent. Our discovery cohort included 928 subjects from the Genetics of Lipid-Lowering Drugs and Diet Network Study. Our replication cohorts included 3,313 subjects from the Heredity and Phenotype Intervention Heart Study and Family Heart Study. A linear mixed model using the kinship matrix was used for association tests. The best association signal was found in a tri-genic region at RHOQ-PIGF-CRIPT for baseline NHDL (lead SNP rs6544903, discovery p = 7e-7, MAF = 2 %; validation p = 6e-4 at 0.1 kb upstream neighboring SNP rs3768725, and 5e-4 at 0.7 kb downstream neighboring SNP rs6733143, MAF = 10 %). The lead and neighboring SNPs were not perfect surrogate proxies to each other (D' = 1, r (2) = 0.003) but they seemed to be partially dependent (likelihood ration test p = 0.04). Other suggestive loci (discovery p < 1e-6) included LOC100419812 and LOC100288337 for baseline NHDL, and LOC100420502 and CDH13 for NHDL PPL response that were not replicated (p > 0.01). The current and first GWAS of NHDL yielded an interesting common variant in RHOQ-PIGF-CRIPT influencing baseline NHDL levels. Another common variant in CDH13 for NHDL response to dietary high-fat intake challenge was also suggested. Further validations for both loci from large independent studies, especially interventional studies, are warranted.
    Human Genetics 03/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00439-014-1435-3 · 4.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Se han publicado multitud de estudios sobre la relación entre el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular y diversos nutrientes, alimentos y patrones de alimentación. A pesar del concepto bien aceptado de que la dieta tiene una influencia significativa en el desarrollo y la prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular, los alimentos considerados saludables o perjudiciales han variado con el paso de los años. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo resumir la evidencia científica existente sobre el efecto cardioprotector de los alimentos y nutrientes que se ha considerado saludables y el de aquellos a los que se ha atribuido un carácter no saludable en algún momento de la historia. Para este fin, se ha revisado la literatura científica reciente empleando las palabras clave foods y nutrients (p. ej., carne, omega-3) y términos relacionados con la enfermedad cardiovascular (p. ej., enfermedades cardiovasculares, ictus). Se ha hecho especial énfasis en los metanálisis y las revisiones Cochrane. En general, son escasos los estudios de intervención con un nivel de evidencia alto que respaldan los efectos beneficiosos de los alimentos saludables (como frutas y verduras), mientras que la evidencia que respalda los argumentos en contra de los alimentos considerados menos saludables (como las grasas saturadas) parece haberse debilitado con la evidencia más reciente. En resumen, la mayor parte de la evidencia que respalda los efectos beneficiosos y nocivos de alimentos y nutrientes se basa en estudios epidemiológicos observacionales. Los resultados de los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados revelan un cuadro más confuso, en el que la mayoría de los estudios muestran unos efectos muy pequeños en uno u otro sentido; la evidencia más sólida es la que procede de los patrones de alimentación. El conocimiento actual de la relación entre dieta y riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular requiere unas recomendaciones más individualizadas, basadas en técnicas de genómica.
    Revista Espanola de Cardiologia 09/2014; 67(9). DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2014.05.003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While aspirin is generally effective for prevention of cardiovascular disease, considerable variation in drug response exists, resulting in some individuals displaying high on-treatment platelet reactivity. We used pharmacometabolomics to define pathways implicated in variation of response to treatment. We profiled serum samples from healthy subjects pre- and postaspirin (14 days, 81 mg/day) using mass spectrometry. We established a strong signature of aspirin exposure independent of response (15/34 metabolites changed). In our discovery (N = 80) and replication (N = 125) cohorts, higher serotonin levels pre- and postaspirin correlated with high, postaspirin, collagen-induced platelet aggregation. In a third cohort, platelets from subjects with the highest levels of serotonin preaspirin retained higher reactivity after incubation with aspirin than platelets from subjects with the lowest serotonin levels preaspirin (72 ± 8 vs. 61 ± 11%, P = 0.02, N = 20). Finally, ex vivo, serotonin strongly increased platelet reactivity after platelet incubation with aspirin (+20%, P = 4.9 × 10(-4), N = 12). These results suggest that serotonin is implicated in aspirin response variability.
    07/2014; 3(7):e125. DOI:10.1038/psp.2014.22