Power and Sample Size

Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Methods in Molecular Biology (Impact Factor: 1.29). 02/2007; 404:377-408. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_19
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this chapter, we discuss the concept of statistical power and show how the sample size can be chosen to ensure a desired power. Power is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is false, that is the probability of saying there is a difference when a difference actually exists. An underpowered study does not have a sufficiently large sample size to answer the research question of interest. An overpowered study has too large a sample size and wastes resources. We will show how the power and required sample size can be calculated for several common types of studies, mention software that can be used for the necessary calculations, and discuss additional considerations.

Download full-text


Available from: Douglas Case, Jun 16, 2014
78 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When the one-sample or two-sample t-test is either taught in the class room or applied in practice to small samples, there is considerable divergence of opinion as to whether or not the inferences drawn are valid. Many point to the 'Robustness' of the t-test to violations of assumptions, while others use rank or other robust methods because they believe that the t-test is not robust against violations of such assumptions. It is quite likely, despite the apparent divergence of these two opinions, that both arguments have considerable merit. If we agree that this question cannot possibly be resolved in general, the issue becomes one of determining, before any actual data have been collected, whether the t-test will or will not be robust in a specific application. This paper describes statistical analysis system software, covering a large collection of potential input probability distributions, to investigate both the null and power properties of various one- and two-sample t-tests and their normal approximations, as well as the Wilcoxon two-sample and sign-rank one-sample tests, allowing potential practitioners to determine, at the study design stage, whether the t-test will be robust in their specific application. Sample size projections, based on these actual distributions, are also included. This paper is not intended as a tool to assess robustness after the data have been collected.
    Statistics in Medicine 07/2009; 28(16):2170-84. DOI:10.1002/sim.3581 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In light of the growing epidemics of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), identification and validation of the novel biochemical surrogate markers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are paramount to reduce the necessity for liver biopsy. The availability of such markers has tremendous potential to radically alter the management strategies of NAFLD patients and to monitor the disease activity. Although current biomarkers do not entirely fulfill the many requirements for the identification of patients with NASH, they should not discourage our quest, but remind us that we need to cognize the challenges ahead.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 09/2009; 15(34):4346-7. · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parallels between designed and biological systems with respect to formal failure analyses have been presented. Failure analysis in designed systems depends on an identified, limited set of parameters or operation variables with high predictive value. In contrast, the biological systems pose problems in identification of operation variables and the identified variables may not be accurate predictors of failure. The difficulty in parameter identification is because of large numbers of components and the inability to envelope variables at each compartment or contour level. Contour level maps for biological systems are currently non-existent, and most failure models are based on very limited, unilateral operation variables (a mutant gene). Operation variable identification within each contour level will enhance failure analyses of complex biological systems.
    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Systems Biology and Medicine 09/2010; 2(5):507-17. DOI:10.1002/wsbm.83 · 3.21 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications