Macrophages express multiple ligands for gamma delta TCRs

Integrated Department of Immunology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson Street, Denver, CO 80206, United States.
Molecular Immunology (Impact Factor: 3). 07/2008; 45(11):3253-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.02.031
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As only a handful of ligands have been identified, the general nature of the ligands recognized by gammadelta T cells remains unresolved. In this study, soluble multimerized gammadelta T cell receptors (smTCRs) representing the TCRs of two gammadelta T cell subsets common in the mouse were used to detect and track their own ligands. Ligands for both subsets were found on resident peritoneal macrophages taken from untreated mice, and the expression of both was further induced by Listeria monocytogenes infection. Nevertheless, the two types of ligand differ from one another in abundance, in the kinetics of their induction following Listeria infection, and in their ability to be induced by in vitro culture with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Surprisingly, because both are detectable on normal macrophages, these host-derived ligands are likely expressed constitutively, but are induced to higher levels of expression by stress or inflammation. In contrast to T22 and other known cell surface ligands for gammadelta T cells in mice and humans, expression of these smTCR-defined ligands does not depend on beta2-microglobulin, suggesting that they are not MHC class I or class I-like molecules.

Download full-text


Available from: Rebecca O'Brien, Jun 22, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interleukin (IL)-17 plays a key role in immunity. In acute infections, a rapid IL-17 response must be induced without prior antigen exposure, and γδ T cells are the major initial IL-17 producers. In fact, some γδ T cells make IL-17 within hours after an immune challenge. These cells appear to acquire the ability to respond to IL-1 and IL-23 and to make IL-17 naturally in naïve animals. They are known as the natural Tγδ17 (nTγδ17) cells. The rapidity of the nTγδ17 response, and the apparent lack of explicit T cell receptor (TCR) engagement for its induction have led to the view that this is a cytokine (IL-1, IL-23)-mediated response. However, pharmacological inhibition or genetic defects in TCR signaling drastically reduce the nTγδ17 response and/or their presence. To better understand antigen recognition in this rapid IL-17 response, we analyzed the antigen receptor repertoire of IL-1R(+)/IL-23R(+) γδ T cells, a proxy for nTγδ17 cells in naïve animals directly ex vivo, using a barcode-enabled high throughput single-cell TCR sequence analysis. We found that regardless of their anatomical origin, these cells have a highly focused TCR repertoire. In particular, the TCR sequences have limited V gene combinations, little or no junctional diversity and much reduced or no N region diversity. In contrast, IL-23R(-) cells at mucosal sites similar to most of the splenic γδ T cells and small intestine epithelial γδ lymphocytes expressed diverse TCRs. This remarkable commonality and restricted repertoire of IL-1R(+)/IL-23R(+) γδ T cells underscores the importance of antigen recognition in their establishment/function.
    Frontiers in Immunology 03/2015; 6:118. DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00118
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both antigen recognition and CD28 costimulation are required for the activation of naïve αβ T cells and their subsequent differentiation into cytokine-producing or cytotoxic effectors. Notably, this two-signal paradigm holds true for all αβ T cell subsets, regardless of whether they acquire their effector function in the periphery or the thymus. Because of contradictory results, however, it remains unresolved as to whether CD28 costimulation is necessary for γδ T cell activation and differentiation. Given that γδ T cells have been recently shown to acquire their effector fates in the thymus, it is conceivable that the contradictory results may be explained, in part, by a differential requirement for CD28 costimulation in the development or differentiation of each γδ T cell effector subset. To test this, we examined the role of CD28 in γδ T cell effector fate determination and function. We report that, although IFNγ-producing γδ T (γδ-IFNγ) cells express higher levels of CD28 than IL-17-producing γδ T (γδ-17) cells, CD28-deficiency had no effect on the thymic development of either subset. Also, following Listeria infection, we found that the expansion and differentiation of γδ-17 and γδ-IFNγ effectors were comparable between CD28(+/+) and CD28(-/-) mice. To understand why CD28 costimulation is dispensable for γδ T cell activation and differentiation, we assessed glucose uptake and utilization by γδ T cells, as CD28 costimulation is known to promote glycolysis in αβ T cells. Importantly, we found that γδ T cells express higher surface levels of glucose transporters than αβ T cells and, when activated, exhibit effector functions over a broader range of glucose concentrations than activated αβ T cells. Together, these data not only demonstrate an enhanced glucose metabolism in γδ T cells but also provide an explanation for why γδ T cells are less dependent on CD28 costimulation than αβ T cells.
    PLoS ONE 05/2013; 8(5):e63178. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0063178 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Substantial evidence has been accumulated to indicate that gammadelta T cells take part in type 2 immune responses. It is not yet clear, however, in what capacity. Apparently, gammadelta T cells themselves can not only take the function of follicular T helper (T(H)) cells in certain responses, but also can support responses that are dependent on classical help provided by alphabeta T cells. Furthermore, the gammadelta T cells engage as regulators of T(H2) immunity. Here, we consider two mouse models that depend on type 2 immunity, non-specific airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine after allergen inhalation challenge and the primary IgE response induced by alum-aided immunization, and examine the function of gammadelta T cells. In either case, gammadelta T cells regulate type 2 immunity through balanced enhancing and inhibitory influences. However, after airway allergen exposure, suppressive gammadelta T cells become dominant. The underlying mechanisms are discussed.
    Immunology and Cell Biology 01/2010; DOI:10.1038/icb.2009.105 · 4.21 Impact Factor