Article

Bioavailability of (+)-methamphetamine in the pigeon following an intramuscular dose.

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences #522, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (Impact Factor: 2.82). 10/2008; 90(3):382-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.03.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pigeons are used frequently as subjects in behavioral pharmacology research. An advantage of the pigeon is an exceedingly vascular breast muscle, which is easily accessible for injections. The purpose of these studies was to provide a profile of the pharmacokinetics of (+)-methamphetamine (METH) and (+)-amphetamine (AMP), a pharmacologically active metabolite, in pigeons (n=6) after intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) dosing (0.8 mg/kg). LC-MS/MS analysis was used to determine serum concentrations of METH and AMP. A modified crossover design was used to determine the bioavailability, time to maximum concentration, total clearance, the volume of distribution, the maximal concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and terminal elimination half-life for METH. The route of administration did not significantly affect these pharmacokinetic parameters. The time to maximum concentration for METH and AMP following i.m. administration was 0.3 h. Maximum AMP serum concentrations were achieved in 2 h, irrespective of the route of administration, and these concentrations remained essentially constant for an additional 6 h. The metabolism of METH to AMP was not affected by the route of administration, and the molar ratio AMP to METH AUC values were the same (i.v.=0.57; i.m.=0.41). These results show that METH pharmacokinetics after i.m. administration in the pigeon are similar to i.v. administration. Thus i.m. is a reasonable route of administration for METH behavioral assays in the pigeon if sufficient time for absorption is given following the dose, and the behavioral endpoint is not dependent on the rapid input of METH following an i.v. dose.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
122 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While neuropsychological deficits are evident among methamphetamine (meth) addicts, they are often unrelated to meth exposure parameters such as lifetime consumption and length of abstinence. The notion that some meth users develop neuropsychological impairments while others with similar drug exposure do not, suggests that there may be individual differences in vulnerability to the neurotoxic effects of meth. One source of differential vulnerability could come from genotypic variability in metabolic clearance of meth, dependent on the activity of cytochrome P450-2D6 (CYP2D6). We compared neuropsychological performance in 52 individuals with a history of meth dependence according with their CYP2D6 phenotype. All were free of HIV or hepatitis C infection and did not meet dependence criteria for other substances. Extensive metabolizers showed worse overall neuropsychological performance and were three times as likely to be cognitively impaired as intermediate/poor metabolizers. Groups did not differ in their demographic or meth use characteristics, nor did they evidence differences in mood disorder or other substance use. This preliminary study is the first to suggest that efficient meth metabolism is associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes in humans, and implicates the products of oxidative metabolism of meth as a possible source of brain injury.
    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 09/2010; 16(5):890-901. DOI:10.1017/S1355617710000779 · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevalence of methamphetamine (METH) use is estimated at ~35 million people worldwide, with over 10 million users in the United States. METH use elicits a myriad of social consequences and the behavioral impact of the drug is well understood. However, new information has recently emerged detailing the devastating effects of METH on host immunity, increasing the acquisition of diverse pathogens and exacerbating the severity of disease. These outcomes manifest as modifications in protective physical and chemical defenses, pro-inflammatory responses, and the induction of oxidative stress pathways. Through these processes, significant neurotoxicities arise, and, as such, chronic abusers with these conditions are at a higher risk for heightened consequences. METH use also influences the adaptive immune response, permitting the unrestrained development of opportunistic diseases. In this review, we discuss recent literature addressing the impact of METH on infection and immunity, and identify areas ripe for future investigation.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 01/2014; 8:445. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2014.00445

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
42 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014