Article

Antiandrogen-associated hepatotoxicity in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, ROC.
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association (Impact Factor: 0.89). 01/2004; 66(12):735-40.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Antiandrogens available for patients with advanced prostate cancer are reported to cause hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study is to investigate the antiandrogen-associated hepatotoxicity in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
By retrospective charts review, 229 patients (47-89 years old) with advanced prostate cancer treated by total androgen blockade (TAB) with bilateral orchiectomy or LHRH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) analogues plus antiandrogen, or antiandrogen-radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. There were 124 patients taking flutamide 750 mg daily and 105 patients taking cyproterone acetate (CPA) 150 mg daily. Hepatotoxicity defined by the International Consensus Meeting in 1990 and Food and Drug Administration, USA was used to evaluate the hepatotoxicity (including serious hepatotoxicity).
There was a higher occurrence of hepatotoxicity in patients taking flutamide (15.3%) than taking CPA (9.5%) (p = 0.034). The occurrence of serious hepatotoxicity of flutamide and CPA was 4.8% (6/124) and 3.8% (4/105), respectively. The mean latency period of hepatotoxicity for CPA was 4.8 +/- 2.0 months for flutamide and 5.8 +/- 1.9 months for CPA, respectively. The 2 groups made no significant difference of liver enzyme (mean maximal alanine aminotransaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) = 284.2 +/- 99.3/300.6 +/- 58.5 U/L versus 341.8 +/- 67.1/301.6 +/- 80.5 U/L). All of the 19 patients (100%) and 9 of 10 patients (90%) with flutamide and CPA-induced hepatotoxicity got self-resolution after discontinuation of the antiandrogens. The average time of self-resolution is 4.5 +/- 3.1 months and 6.3 +/- 4.7 months for flutamide and CPA, respectively. Five patients of flutamide-induced and 2 patients of CPA-induced hepatotoxicity got resolution after changing to other antiandrogen.
Flutamide and CPA appear to cause hepatotoxic effects in some patients. Discontinuation of the antiandrogens seems to be the resolution of hepatotoxicity. A change to other antiandrogen may be the alternative strategy to the antiandrogen-induced hepatotoxicity. The results of this study suggest that all patients received flutamide and CPA should be monitored carefully for signs and symptoms referable to hepatic injury to prevent the development of serious hepatic dysfunction.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
107 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management of acne vulgaris by nondermatologists is increasing. Current understanding of the different presentations of acne allows for individualized treatments and improved outcomes. To review the best evidence available for individualized treatment of acne. Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database to search for all English-language articles on acne treatment from 1966 to 2004. Well-designed randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other systematic reviews are the focus of this article. Acne literature is characterized by a lack of standardization with respect to outcome measures and methods used to grade disease severity. Main outcome measures of 29 randomized double-blind trials that were evaluated included reductions in inflammatory, noninflammatory, and total acne lesion counts. Topical retinoids reduce the number of comedones and inflammatory lesions in the range of 40% to 70%. These agents are the mainstay of therapy in patients with comedones only. Other agents, including topical antimicrobials, oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy (in women), and isotretinoin all yield high response rates. Patients with mild to moderate severity inflammatory acne with papules and pustules should be treated with topical antibiotics combined with retinoids. Oral antibiotics are first-line therapy in patients with moderate to severe inflammatory acne while oral isotretinoin is indicated for severe nodular acne, treatment failures, scarring, frequent relapses, or in cases of severe psychological distress. Long-term topical or oral antibiotic therapy should be avoided when feasible to minimize occurrence of bacterial resistance. Isotretinoin is a powerful teratogen mandating strict precautions for use among women of childbearing age. Acne responses to treatment vary considerably. Frequently more than 1 treatment modality is used concomitantly. Best results are seen when treatments are individualized on the basis of clinical presentation.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 09/2004; 292(6):726-35. · 29.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The rationale for hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate can-cer is based on the modern understanding of radiobiology and advances in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques. Whole-pelvis irradiation combined with SBRT boost for high-risk prostate cancer might escalate biologically effective dose without increasing toxicity. Here, we report our 4-year results of SBRT boost for high-risk localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: From October 2009 to August 2012, 41 patients newly diag-nosed, high-risk or very high-risk (NCCN definition) localized prostate cancer were treated with whole-pelvis irradiation and SBRT boost. The whole pelvis dose was 45 Gy (25 frac-tions of 1.8 Gy). The SBRT boost dose was 21 Gy (three fractions of 7 Gy). Ninety percent of these patients received hormone therapy. The toxicities of gastrointestinal (GI) and gen-itourinary (GU) tracts were scored by Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Effect (CTCAE v3.0). Biochemical failure was defined by Phoenix definition. Results: Median follow-up was 42 months. Mean PSA before treatment was 44.18 ng/ml. Mean PSA level at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was 0.94, 0.44, 0.13, 0.12, and 0.05 ng/ml, respectively. The estimated 4-year biochemical failure-free survival was 91.9%. Three bio-chemical failures were observed. GI and GU tract toxicities were minimal. No grade 3 acute GU or GI toxicity was noted. During radiation therapy, 27% of the patient had grade 2 acute GU toxicity and 12% had grade 2 acute GI toxicity. At 3 months, most toxicity scores had returned to baseline. At the last follow-up, there was no grade 3 late GU or GI toxicity. Conclusions: Whole-pelvis irradiation combined with SBRT boost for high-risk localized prostate cancer is feasible with minimal toxicity and encouraging biochemical failure-free survival. Continued accrual and follow-up would be necessary to confirm the biochemical control rate and the toxicity profiles.
    Frontiers in Oncology 10/2014;
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
1 Download
Available from
Dec 7, 2014