Surgical treatment of urethral distraction defect associated with pelvic fracture: A nationwide survey in Japan

Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, Koshigaya, Japan.
International Journal of Urology (Impact Factor: 2.41). 05/2008; 15(7):621-4; quiz 624. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02064.x
Source: PubMed


To survey practice patterns in surgical treatment for urethral distraction defect associated with pelvic fracture (PFUDD) and to analyze outcomes of the treatment in Japan.
A questionnaire on surgical treatment for PFUDD to 3307 Japanese consultant urologists was sent. Responses were collected and statistically analyzed.
The number of respondents was 1290 (39%). Patients surgically treated for PFUDD in the previous 5 years totaled 0 for 919 urologists (71%), one to two for 283 (22%), and three to ten for 83 (7%) urologists. Realignment for PFUDD was carried out within 2 weeks in 205 patients (23%), after 2-6 months in 607 (69%) patients, and after more than 6 months in 72 (8%) patients. Urologists operated on 361 (61%) patients endoscopically (ES), 108 (18%) by open anastomosis (OA) and 101 (17%) by pull-through operation (PT). According to the operator's impression, success rates were 65% for ES, 79% for PT and 69% for OA. Re-operation (RO) rates were 43%, 25% and 26% for ES, PT, and OA, respectively, (ES vs PT or OA; P < 0.05). Postoperative repeated urethral dilatation (PORUD) was required in 71% of ES, 77% of PT and 38% of OA cases (OA vs ES or PT; P < 0.05).
PFUDD represents a rare disorder for Japanese urologists. Deferred endoscopic realignment is the preferred treatment option. Success rates were not different among three surgical treatments. OA was superior to ES and PT in terms of PORUD and RO.

Download full-text


Available from: Satoshi Kitahara, Oct 17, 2014
21 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ObjectifRessortir les aspects anatomocliniques et évaluer les résultats thérapeutiques d’une série de complications urinaires des traumatismes du bassin suivie au service d’urologie-andrologie du CHU de Conakry. Matériel et méthodeIl s’agit d’une étude rétrospective colligeant 52 cas de complications urinaires des traumatismes du bassin sur une période de cinq ans. RésultatsLes complications urinaires des traumatismes du bassin représentaient 3 % de l’ensemble des hospitalisations durant la période d’étude. L’âge moyen de nos patients était de 33 ans, avec des extrêmes de 10 et 63 ans. Les traumatismes étaient dus aux accidents de la voie publique dans 54,9 % des cas. Sur le plan clinique, la symptomatologie était essentiellement constituée par la rétention aiguë d’urines avec 80,7 % des cas et d’hémorragie (hématurie et urétrorragie). La principale complication urinaire observée après le traumatisme du bassin était une lésion de l’urètre postérieur, avec 82,7 % des cas. Tous les patients ont bénéficié d’un traitement chirurgical. Les résultats thérapeutiques ont été jugés après un recul moyen de 52 mois sur les plans urinaire et sexuel. Ainsi, sur le plan urinaire, les résultats ont été jugés bons dans 59,6 % des cas, moyens dans 17,3 % et mauvais dans 23,1 % des cas. Sur le plan sexuel, on a noté que 53,8 % (n = 28) des patients ne présentaient pas de dysfonction érectile, 25 % (n = 13) des patients avaient une dysfonction modérée et 21,2 % (n = 11) une dysfonction sévère. ConclusionLa prise en charge des complications urinaires des traumatismes du bassin est controversée, cependant, nous insistons sur la nécessité d’une étroite collaboration avec les orthopédistes, car la stabilisation des fractures du bassin constitue un élément capital de cette prise en charge. ObjectiveTo stick out the anatomoclinic aspects and to evaluate the therapeutic results of a series of some pelvic trauma complications is followed at the Urology-Andrology ward in the teaching hospital of Conakry. Material and methodIt’s about a retrospective examined joining together 52 cases of some pelvic trauma complications in a period of five years. ResultsThe pelvic trauma complications were representing 3% of whole the hospitalisations during the period of study. The mean age of our patients was 33 years with extremes of 10 and 63 years. The traumas were due to accidents on the public road in 54.9% of cases. In terms of clinics, the symptomatology was essentially constituted by the acute retention of urines with 80.7% of cases and the hemorrhage (hematury and uretrorragy). The main trauma was a back urethral lesion with 82.7% of cases. All the patients profited a surgical treatment. The therapeutics has been judged after an average relapse of 52 months in terms of urinary and sexual complications. Thus, in terms of urinary complications results have been judged good in 59.6% of cases, less in 17.3% and bad in 23.7% of cases. In terms of sexual, we remarked 53.8% of good result, 25% of medium results and 21.2% (N = 11) of bad results. ConclusionManagement of urinary complication after pelvic trauma is controversy. Thus, we insist on more necessary collaboration between urologist and orthopedist because the stabilisation of the pelvic trauma is very interesting to the management.
    Andrologie 12/2009; 19(4):203-208. DOI:10.1007/s12610-009-0037-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Iatrogenic trauma aside, urethral injuries are not common. Nonetheless, there have been a large number of cohort studies, generally of small numbers of patients. This review pulls together all of the information available to try and produce a coherent narrative.
    BJU International 09/2011; 108(5):630-50. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10340.x · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: We present our experience in doing an antegrade-retrograde maneuver in the form of cut-to-light or cut-to-sound in treating complete posterior urethral strictures. Patients and Methods: Between April 2005 and November 2011, 31 patients out of 99 with posterior urethral strictures underwent endoscopic urethral dilation using a ureteroscope (URS) through suprapubic cystostomy and internal urethrotome retrogradely through the urethra. Their ages ranged between 16 to 70 years (mean: 35) and strictures were caused by car accidents in 19 patients, falls astride in 4, gunshots in 3, iatrogenics in 4, and a bomb explosion in 1. The length of the stricture was 4 to 10 mm (mean: 7.6). Result: Operative time ranged between 20 to 70 minutes (mean: 37.74) and blood transfusion was needed in 2 patients. Cut-to-light was performed in 20 while cut-to-sound was performed in 11. Hospital stay ranged between 1 to 3 days. Catheter stay time was 2 to 4 weeks (mean: 2.4). Twenty-seven patients passed urine smoothly after removal of the catheter, and during a period of observation (10 days), 2 needed transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to pass urine strongly, so the success rate is 93.5%. Within 3 to 6 months, another 4 patients needed dilation so the success rate decreased to 80.6%. Another 2 needed dilation after 2 years, so the success rate dropped to 74.2%. Complications were in the form of bleeding in 2 patients and rectal injury in 1. Follow-up ranged between 3 and 24 months. Conclusion: Antegrade-retrograde visual-internal urethrotomy is safe, under vision of the procedure in complete urethral strictures, so it is more or less acceptable. It markedly decreased operative time, hospital stay, and cost.
    10/2012; 05(05). DOI:10.3834/uij.1944-5784.2012.10.01