Depressed and a co-morbid condition: more psychotropics prescribed!

Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
The European journal of general practice (Impact Factor: 0.81). 02/2008; 14(1):10-8. DOI: 10.1080/13814780701855724
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Depression often occurs simultaneously with a variety of somatic, psychiatric, and social conditions. Knowledge about differences in the pharmacological treatment of depressed patients with and without co-morbidity is lacking.
To compare GPs' pharmacological treatment of depressed patients with and without co-morbidity.
Data were extracted from the computerized medical records of 77 general practices participating in the Dutch National Information Network of General Practice (LINH). We used diagnosis and prescription data of newly diagnosed depressed patients aged 18-65 years (n=4372). A mixed-model technique was used for analyzing the medical data.
During the year after diagnosing depression, depressed patients who also suffered from chronic somatic or psychiatric morbidity were prescribed more psychotropics than patients with depression only. Prescription patterns of psychotropic drugs for depressed patients with and without co-morbid social problems differed only during the first 3 months after diagnosis. For the whole 1-year period after diagnosis, the pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with and without co-morbid social problems did not differ.
Our results indicate that chronic somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity in depressed patients leads to higher GP prescription levels of psychotropics, whereas co-morbid social problems do not seem to influence GPs' pharmacological treatment decisions for depression.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is widespread concern about access to good quality health care for ethnic minority groups. This study investigates differences between ethnic groups regarding prevalence of anxiety and depression, and adherence to treatment guidelines by family practitioners in urban areas in the Netherlands. Data from electronic medical records, collected for the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice. Diagnoses were based on the International Classification of Primary Care. Adherence to guidelines included at least five consultations, prescription of psychotropics for 6 weeks at most (indicative of cessation in case of nonresponse) or 5 months at least (suggesting continuation in case of response), and/or a referral to a mental health care specialist. Data were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression analyses. A total of 6413 patients (4.4% of practice population) were diagnosed with anxiety and/or depression. Prevalence was highest in Turkish patients (5.2%). Of diagnosed patients, 42.9% received guideline-concordant treatment. Only Surinamese/Antillean patients were less likely than ethnic Dutch to receive treatments according to guidelines. Prevalence of and quality of care for anxiety and depression were comparable between ethnic minority clients, but some differences suggest that efforts to educate primary care providers in management of anxiety/depression should be continued and tailored to specific ethnic groups.
    General hospital psychiatry 07/2010; 32(4):368-76. DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.010 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Despite its public health significance, data about depression in general practice are often unavailable. OBJECTIVE: To study (i) the incidence of GP-diagnosed depression during 2008, (ii) associations between patient characteristics, appraised severity and initiated treatment, (iii) GPs' usual care compared to diagnostic criteria from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition guidelines and the newly developed practice guideline of the Society of Flemish GPs (2008) and (iv) GPs' initiated treatments compared to the Flemish Guideline. METHODS: General practice-based data were collected on all patients of ≥18 years who were diagnosed by their GP with a new episode of depression in Belgian sentinel general practices (SGP) during 2008. RESULTS: Data on 1739 persons were recorded by 172 sentinel general practices. Incidence rates for GP-diagnosed depression were estimated at 719/100 000 men and 1440/100 000 women. Thirty-one per cent of patients had mild, 50% had moderate and 19% had severe GP-diagnosed depression. Although only 43% of the patients at risk for suicide were considered to have severe depression, having thoughts of death or suicide was the main factor associated with increased severity of depression. Seventy-five per cent of patients received a prescription for an antidepressive agent; 29% received a prescription for another psychoactive agent; in 36%, non-pharmaceutical support was initiated by the GP and 25% received a referral. In contrast with the Flemish GP guideline criteria: (i) 69% of patients with a new episode of mild or a first episode of moderate depression were prescribed an antidepressive agent and (ii) only 39% of the patients with severe depression were both prescribed an antidepressive agent and referred to a mental health service. CONCLUSIONS: This study has yielded original data on the incidence and management of depression in Belgian general practice. Our findings show that efforts are needed to improve depression management in Belgian general practice.
    Family Practice 04/2012; DOI:10.1093/fampra/cms024 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective This study aimed to identify primary care practice characteristics associated with the quality of depression care in patients with comorbid chronic medical and/or psychiatric conditions. Method Using data from cross-sectional organizational and patient surveys conducted within 61 primary care clinics in Quebec, Canada, the relationships between primary care practice characteristics, comorbidity profile, and the recognition and minimally adequate treatment of depression were assessed using multilevel logistic regression analysis with 824 adults with past-year depression and comorbid chronic conditions. Results Likelihood of depression recognition was higher in clinics where accessibility of mental health professionals was not viewed to be a major barrier to depression care (OR=1.61; 95% CI 1.13-2.30). Four practice characteristics were associated with minimal treatment adequacy: greater use of treatment algorithms for depression (OR=1.77; 95% CI=1.18-2.65), high value given to teamwork (OR=2.48; 95% CI=1.40-4.38), having at least one GP at the clinic devote significant time in practice to mental health (OR=1.54; 95% CI=1.07-2.21), and low perceived barriers to depression care due to inadequate payment models (OR=2.12; 95% CI=1.30-3.46). Conclusions Several primary care practice characteristics significantly influence the quality of care provided to patients with depression and comorbid chronic conditions and should be targeted in quality improvement efforts.
    General hospital psychiatry 05/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.01.013 · 2.90 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014