Physician numeracy: essential skills for practicing evidence-based medicine.

Department of Pediatrics, UPMC St. Margaret Family Medicine Residency Program and Center for EBM Education, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Family medicine (Impact Factor: 0.85). 06/2008; 40(5):354-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become common in family medicine residency programs. EBM teaching usually takes the form of journal clubs or encouraging residents to use EBM summaries of original articles. Both have significant limitations. Residents and other physicians recognize that understanding statistics is important for interpreting results. Unfortunately, they report low self confidence in this area reflected by studies that show poor skills. Physician numeracy refers to a broad range of mathematical skills needed for practicing medicine, including the statistical knowledge necessary to interpret original research papers. Numeracy should be given much more emphasis in residency curricula and can form the foundation of EBM teaching. Objectives for a numeracy curriculum based on a recent research article and a curriculum using an EBM framework are described.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little is known about how physicians provide statistical information to patients, which is important for informed consent. In a survey, obstetricians and gynecologists (N = 142) received statistical information about the benefit and side effects of an antidepressant. They received information in various formats, including event rates (antidepressant v. placebo), absolute risks, and relative risks. Participants had to imagine 2 hypothetical patients, 1 for whom they believed the drug to be safe and effective and 1 for whom they did not, and select the information they would give those patients. We assessed whether the information they selected for each patient was complete, transparent, interpretable, or persuasive (i.e., to nudge patients toward a particular option) and compared physicians who gave both patients the same information with those who gave both patients different information. A similar proportion of physicians (roughly 25% each) selected information that was 1) complete and transparent, 2) complete but not transparent, 3) not interpretable for the patient because necessary comparative information was missing, or 4) suited for nudging. Physicians who gave both patients the same information (61% of physicians) more often selected at least complete information, even if it was often not transparent. Physicians who gave both patients different information (39% of physicians), in contrast, more often selected information that was suited for nudging in line with the belief they were asked to imagine. A limitation is that scenarios were hypothetical. Most physicians did not provide complete and transparent information. Clinicians who presented consistent information to different patients tended to present complete information, whereas those who varied what information they chose to present appeared more prone to nudging.
    Medical Decision Making 08/2013; 34(2). DOI:10.1177/0272989X13501720 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical educators have used multiple interventions to teach evidence-based medicine (EBM) and information mastery. Most of these interventions are applied uniformly to a group of residents. We developed a curriculum to increase residents' EBM and information mastery skills that would meet individual learning needs. Two cohorts of second year residents (n=26) in the Family Medicine Residency Program at Brown University participated in the intervention. We delivered the curriculum through monthly individual meetings with a learning coach over 1 year. Before and after participating, residents completed a survey assessing their attitudes toward EBM and a quiz assessing their knowledge of EBM. Semi-structured interviews with each resident were done after the intervention and analyzed using qualitative methods. At the conclusion of our intervention, residents' attitudes toward EBM and information mastery were overwhelmingly positive, EBM knowledge quiz scores increased by 31.8%, and reported use of EBM in real time during patient encounters increased. An intervention using a learning coach to provide one-on-one EBM and information mastery instruction to residents improved residents' attitudes, knowledge, and use of both in the clinical setting.
    Family medicine 05/2012; 44(5):351-5. · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Efficient health care requires informed doctors and patients. The health care system we inherited from the 20th century falls short on both counts. Most doctors and patients do not understand the available medical evidence. We identify seven "sins" that have contributed to this lack of knowledge: biased funding; biased reporting in medical journals, brochures, and the media; conflicts of interest; defensive medicine; and medical schools that fail to teach doctors how to comprehend health statistics. These flaws have generated a partially inefficient system that wastes taxpayers' money for unnecessary or even potentially harmful tests and treatments, and for medical research that is of limited relevance for the patient. Raising taxes or rationing care are often thought to be the only alternatives in the face of exploding health care costs. Yet there is a third option through promoting health literacy: getting better care for less money. The 21st century should become the century of the patient. Governments and health institutions need to change course and provide honest and transparent information, creating better doctors, better patients, and, ultimately, better health care.


Available from