Article

Severe hyperlactatemia with normal base excess: a quantitative analysis using conventional and Stewart approaches.

Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Critical care (London, England) (impact factor: 4.61). 05/2008; 12(3):R66. DOI:10.1186/cc6896
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Critically ill patients might present complex acid-base disorders, even when the pH, PCO2, [HCO3-], and base excess ([BE]) levels are normal. Our hypothesis was that the acidifying effect of severe hyperlactatemia is frequently masked by alkalinizing processes that normalize the [BE]. The goal of the present study was therefore to quantify these disorders using both Stewart and conventional approaches.
A total of 1,592 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated on intensive care unit admission. Patients with severe hyperlactatemia (lactate level > or = 4.0 mmol/l) were grouped according to low or normal [BE] values (<-3 mmol/l or >-3 mmol/l).
Severe hyperlactatemia was present in 168 of the patients (11%). One hundred and thirty-four (80%) patients had low [BE] levels while 34 (20%) patients did not. Shock was more frequently present in the low [BE] group (46% versus 24%, P = 0.02) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the normal [BE] group (38% versus 4%, P < 0.0001). Levels of lactate were slightly higher in patients with low [BE] (6.4 +/- 2.4 mmol/l versus 5.6 +/- 2.1 mmol/l, P = 0.08). According to our study design, the pH, [HCO3-], and strong-ion difference values were lower in patients with low [BE]. Patients with normal [BE] had lower plasma [Cl-] (100 +/- 6 mmol/l versus 107 +/- 5 mmol/l, P < 0.0001) and higher differences between the changes in anion gap and [HCO3-] (5 +/- 6 mmol/l versus 1 +/- 4 mmol/l, P < 0.0001).
Critically ill patients may present severe hyperlactatemia with normal values of pH, [HCO3-], and [BE] as a result of associated hypochloremic alkalosis.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
66 Views
  • Article: Comparison of three different methods of evaluation of metabolic acid-base disorders.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Stewart approach states that pH is primarily determined by Pco2, strong ion difference (SID), and nonvolatile weak acids. This method might identify severe metabolic disturbances that go undetected by traditional analysis. Our goal was to compare diagnostic and prognostic performances of the Stewart approach with a) the traditional analysis based on bicarbonate (HCO3) and base excess (BE); and b) an approach relying on HCO3, BE, and albumin-corrected anion gap (AGcorrected). Prospective observational study. A university-affiliated hospital intensive care unit (ICU). Nine hundred thirty-five patients admitted to the ICU. None. The Stewart approach detected an arterial metabolic alteration in 131 (14%) of patients with normal HCO3- and BE, including 120 (92%) patients with metabolic acidosis. However, 108 (90%) of these patients had an increased AGcorrected. The Stewart approach permitted the additional diagnosis of metabolic acidosis in only 12 (1%) patients with normal HCO3, BE, and AGcorrected. On the other hand, the Stewart approach failed to identify 27 (3%) patients with alterations otherwise observed with the use of HCO3-, BE, and AGcorrected (16 cases of acidosis and 11 of alkalosis). SID and BE, and strong ion gap (SIG) and AGcorrected, were tightly correlated (R2 = .86 and .97, p < .0001 for both) with narrow 95% limits of agreement (8 and 3 mmol/L, respectively). Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves to predict 30-day mortality were 0.83, 0.62, 0.61, 0.60, 0.57, 0.56, and 0.67 for Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, SIG, AGcorrected, SID, BE, HCO3-, and lactates, respectively (SOFA vs. the rest, p < .0001). In this large group of critically ill patients, diagnostic performance of the Stewart approach exceeded that of HCO3- and BE. However, when AGcorrected was included in the analysis, the Stewart approach did not offer any diagnostic or prognostic advantages.
    Critical Care Medicine 05/2007; 35(5):1264-70. · 6.33 Impact Factor
  • Article: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents the form and validation results of APACHE II, a severity of disease classification system. APACHE II uses a point score based upon initial values of 12 routine physiologic measurements, age, and previous health status to provide a general measure of severity of disease. An increasing score (range 0 to 71) was closely correlated with the subsequent risk of hospital death for 5815 intensive care admissions from 13 hospitals. This relationship was also found for many common diseases. When APACHE II scores are combined with an accurate description of disease, they can prognostically stratify acutely ill patients and assist investigators comparing the success of new or differing forms of therapy. This scoring index can be used to evaluate the use of hospital resources and compare the efficacy of intensive care in different hospitals or over time.
    Critical Care Medicine 11/1985; 13(10):818-29. · 6.33 Impact Factor
  • Article: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.
    Intensive Care Medicine 08/1996; 22(7):707-10. · 5.40 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Keywords

1,592 consecutive patients
 
acidifying effect
 
alkalinizing processes
 
base excess
 
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
 
conventional approaches
 
Critically ill patients
 
higher differences
 
hypochloremic alkalosis
 
intensive care unit admission
 
lactate level
 
low [BE] group
 
normal [BE]
 
normal [BE] group
 
normal [BE] values
 
normal values
 
PCO2
 
severe hyperlactatemia
 
Stewart
 
strong-ion difference values