Article

Worldwide variability in physical inactivity a 51-country survey.

Department of Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion, Geneva, Switzerland.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.28). 07/2008; 34(6):486-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Physical inactivity is an important risk factor for chronic diseases, but for many (mainly developing) countries, no prevalence data have ever been published.
To present data on the prevalence of physical inactivity for 51 countries and for different age groups and settings across these countries.
Data analysis (conducted in 2007) included data from 212,021 adult participants whose questionnaires were culled from 259,526 adult observations from 51 countries participating in the World Health Survey (2002-2003). The validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess days and duration of vigorous, moderate, and walking activities during the last 7 days.
Country prevalence of physical inactivity ranged from 1.6% (Comoros) to 51.7% (Mauritania) for men and from 3.8% (Comoros) to 71.2% (Mauritania) for women. Physical inactivity was generally high for older age groups and lower in rural as compared to urban areas.
Overall, about 15% of men and 20% of women from the 51 countries analyzed here (most of which are developing countries) are at risk for chronic diseases due to physical inactivity. There were substantial variations across countries and settings. The baseline information on the magnitude of the problem of physical inactivity provided by this study can help countries and health policymakers to set up interventions addressing the global chronic disease epidemic.

4 Followers
 · 
145 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physical inactivity surveillance informs policy and treatment options toward meeting the World Health Organization's (WHO) goal of a 10% reduction in its prevalence by 2025. We currently do not know the aggregate prevalence for Muslim-majority countries, many of which have extremely high rates of comorbidities associated with physical inactivity.
    01/2015; 2:71-75. DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.12.007
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The prevalence of adult obesity is higher in women than men in most countries. However, the pathways that link female sex with excess obesity are still not fully understood. We examine whether socioeconomic and behavioural factors may mediate the association between sex and obesity in the Saudi Arabian setting where there is female excess in obesity. Methods: We performed a mediation analysis using a cross-sectional, national household survey from Saudi Arabia with 4758 participants (51% female). A series of multivariable regression models were fitted to test if socioeconomic position, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and smoking mediate the association between sex and obesity (BMI >=30). The findings were confirmed using causal mediation analysis. Results: Women in this sample were roughly twice as likely as men to be obese (crude OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.3). The odds ratio remained significantly higher for women compared to men in models testing for mediation (OR range 1.95–2.06). Our data suggest that indicators of socioeconomic position, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, diet, and smoking do not mediate the sex differences in obesity. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that most commonly measured risk factors for obesity do not explain the sex differences in its prevalence in the Saudi context. Further research is needed to understand what might explain the female excess in obesity prevalence. We discuss how data related to the lived experience of Saudi men and women may tap into underlying mechanisms by which the sex difference in obesity prevalence are produced.
    BMC Public Health 03/2015; 15(254). DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1608-6 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Body building is one of the popular types of recreational physical activities worldwide. However, body builders often choose a one-way training program to induce hypertrophy while disregarding cardiovascular exercises that are important for increasing performance and maintaining a healthy life. This study aimed to assess the physical finess levels of recreational body builders in accordance with the guidelines of the American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM). Twenty-two male athletes (aged 19–42 years) participated in this study (height: 176.9 ± 5.78 cm, weight: 80.81±6.44 kg, body building experience: 3 years). The maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was measured using the Queen’s College step test and flxibility was assessed with the stand and reach test. The back and leg strengths of the participants were determined using an isometric dynamometer. Skinfolds were measured with a calipers and the Durnin and Womersley formula was used to measure the body fat percentage. Demographic features and data pertaining to the training schedules were obtained from a data collection form which was prepared by the researchers. The participants showed the following mean scores for the parameters assessed: body mass index (BMI): 25.82 ± 1.7 kg/m2; VO2max: 51.07 ± 8.02 ml/kg/min; stand and reach test score: 11.48 ± 6.12 cm; leg strength: 123.59 ± 29.49 kg; back strength: 124.09 ± 26.40 kg; right hand grip strength: 53.83 ± 7.82 kg; and body fat percentage: 13.32 % ± 2.80 %. According to the ACSM norms, the participants had normal BMI, VO2max, and body fat percentage, but low flxibility and strength. It is therefore recommended that recreational bodybuilders add flxibility and maximal strength training to their routine training schedule.