Article

Physician responses to a community-level trial promoting judicious antibiotic use

Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
The Annals of Family Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.57). 05/2008; 6(3):206-12. DOI: 10.1370/afm.839
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In an environment of multiple campaigns promoting judicious antibiotic use in children, identification of effective strategies is important. We assessed physician responses to a community-level intervention with respect to antibiotic prescribing, related practices, and perceived effectiveness.
This study was a mixed qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a randomized controlled community-wide educational intervention in 16 Massachusetts communities. Physicians in intervention communities received locally endorsed guidelines, group educational sessions, and biweekly newsletters. Parents simultaneously received materials in physicians' offices and by mail. After the intervention, we conducted a mailed physician survey and individual interviews to assess the impact of the intervention. We compared survey responses for intervention and control physicians, and we analyzed interview transcripts to provide in-depth information about selected topics.
Among survey respondents (n = 168), 91% of intervention and 4% of control physicians reported receiving intervention materials. Physicians received information from multiple other sources. More intervention than control physicians reported decreased antibiotic prescribing from 2000-2003 (75% vs 58%, P = .03), but there were no differences between groups in knowledge, attitudes, or behaviors favoring judicious antibiotic use. Both groups were concerned about antibiotic resistance and reported room to reduce their own prescribing. Interviewed physicians suggested frequent repetition of messages, brief written materials on specific topics for themselves and patients, and promotion in the mass media as the most effective strategies to reduce prescribing.
In multiple communities an intervention in physician offices to promote judicious antibiotic prescribing reached its intended audience, but physicians' self-reported attitudes and practices were similar in intervention and control communities. Campaigns that repeat brief, consistent reminders to multiple stakeholder groups may be most effective at assuring judicious antibiotic use.

1 Follower
 · 
61 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To study the clinical and lab parameters in adult patients with suspected or confirmed bacterial meningitis (BM) to find out the usefull predictors. Methodology: This was a retrospective study conducted in Razi hospital, a training center affiliated to Ahvaz Joundishapoor University of Medical Sciences in Iran. All patients with meningitis aged 18 years ore more between 2003 and 2007, with CSF pleocytosis and who had not received antibiotic treatment before lumbar puncture were reviewed. Results: Among 312 patients with CSF pleocytosis, two hundred fifteen (68.9%) had BM and ninety seven (31.1%) had aseptic meningitis (ASM). The mean age for patients with BM was 34.7 ± 17.7 years and for ASM was 32.2 ± 15.5 years (P=0.22, NS). Sixty percent of the cases of BM and 61.2% of the cases of ASM occurred in men (P=0.70, NS). We identified the following predictors of BM: CSF-WBC count>100 per micro liter, CSF-glucose level <40 mg/dl, CSF-protein level>80 mg/dl. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of these predictors, and LR for BM are 86.5%,52.6%,80.2%, 63.7% and 104.1 for CSF-WBC count and 72.1%, 83.5%, 90.6%,57.4% and 164.2% for CSF glucose, and 49.7%, 91.8%, 93.4%,45.2% and 104.5% for CSF protein. Conclusion: The CSF WBC count should not be used alone to rule out bacterial meningitis. When it is combined with other factors such as CSF glucose and protein it helps in decision making in patients suffering from bacterial meningitis.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJETIVO: Traçar um perfil dos médicos que atendem crianças nos sistemas público (Sistema Único de Saúde) e privado de saúde e verificar como são prescritos antimicrobianos nas infecções das vias aéreas superiores. MÉTODOS: Médicos de algumas cidades do interior do Estado de São Paulo receberam via correio ou nas Unidades Básicas de Saúde uma carta explicativa sobre a pesquisa e o questionário, com perguntas sobre: tempo de graduação, residência médica, carga horária e local de trabalho, forma de atualização, fatores que consideram ao prescrever antimicrobianos e casos clínicos sobre as infecções das vias aéreas superiores. Os dados pessoais dos médicos foram relacionados com as respostas aos casos clínicos. Para análise estatística, foram aplicados os testes Z e de Tukey-Kramer, sendo p<0,05 significante.RESULTADOS: A amostra foi composta por 170 prescritores: 86,5% possuíam residência em Pediatria, 75% trabalhavam no Sistema Único de Saúde e 71% tinham carga horária superior a 40 horas semanais. Os formados há menos de dez anos valorizaram mais os laboratórios farmacêuticos como forma de atualização do que os graduados há mais de 30 anos; 33% dos médicos do Sistema Único de Saúde atendem mais de cinco pacientes por hora. A média de acerto nos casos clínicos foi de 87%. O uso das entidades médicas como forma de atualização foi associado a respostas corretas, enquanto o uso de materiais de laboratório estava ligado a respostas incorretas (p<0,05). Houve clara tendência de diminuição dos acertos conforme o número de pacientes atendidos por hora aumentava. CONCLUSÕES: Educação adequada sobre o tema e melhora nas condições de trabalho podem ser eficientes para reduzir a prescrição de antibióticos para infecções das vias aéreas superiores em crianças.
    Revista Paulista de Pediatria 12/2012; 30(4):471-478.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Excessive and inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to growing antibiotic resistance, an important public-health problem. Strategies must be developed to improve antibiotic-prescribing. Our purpose is to review of educational programs aimed at improving antibiotic-prescribing by physicians and/or antibiotic-dispensing by pharmacists, in both primary-care and hospital settings. We conducted a critical systematic search and review of the relevant literature on educational programs aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing and dispensing practice in primary-care and hospital settings, published in January 2001 through December 2011. We identified 78 studies for analysis, 47 in primary-care and 31 in hospital settings. The studies differed widely in design but mostly reported positive results. Outcomes measured in the reviewed studies were adherence to guidelines, total of antibiotics prescribed, or both, attitudes and behavior related to antibiotic prescribing and quality of pharmacy practice related to antibiotics. Twenty-nine studies (62%) in primary care and twenty-four (78%) in hospital setting reported positive results for all measured outcomes; fourteen studies (30%) in primary care and six (20%) in hospital setting reported positive results for some outcomes and results that were not statistically influenced by the intervention for others; only four studies in primary care and one study in hospital setting failed to report significant post-intervention improvements for all outcomes. Improvement in adherence to guidelines and decrease of total of antibiotics prescribed, after educational interventions, were observed, respectively, in 46% and 41% of all the reviewed studies. Changes in behaviour related to antibiotic-prescribing and improvement in quality of pharmacy practice was observed, respectively, in four studies and one study respectively. The results show that antibiotic use could be improved by educational interventions, being mostly used multifaceted interventions.
    BMC Public Health 12/2014; 14(1):1276. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1276 · 2.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
46 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014