Article

Formulary management of recombinant factor VIIa at an academic medical center.

Department of Pharmacy Practice; Clinical Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Center, Mercer University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (impact factor: 2.13). 06/2008; 42(6):771-6. DOI:10.1345/aph.1L047 pp.771-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa (rVIIa) is a procoagulant indicated for treatment of bleeding in patients with hemophilia. A large proportion of rVIIa utilization is for off-label administration in nonhemophiliac patients with acute hemorrhage. Concerns of potentially inappropriate use, safety, and cost of rVIIa led to efforts to standardize use of this agent.
To comparatively describe the utilization of rVIIa upon implementation of an evidence-based guideline at a university hospital.
With advisory direction from a multidisciplinary task force, an evidence-based guideline for use of rVIIa was developed, approved, and fully implemented. Assessment of appropriateness of use and retrospective review were required for all cases. Effects of these actions were evaluated by auditing and comparing rVIIa use in patients treated in two 6-month observation periods before and after guideline implementation. Outcomes assessed were proportions of patients deemed appropriate to receive rVIIa, compliance with dosing recommendations, and acquisition costs.
Twenty-two and 29 patients were treated in the periods before and after guideline implementation, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar, except more cardiothoracic surgeries were performed in patients treated before implementation of the guideline. Indications for rVIIa use were judged appropriate in 21 (95.5%) before-cases and in all (100%) after-cases. The dose was compliant in 1 (4.6%) before-case and 27 (93.1%) after-cases (p < 0.001). Mean dosages of rVIIa administered were 81.8 microg/kg and 45.3 microg/kg in before- and after-cases, respectively (p < 0.001). During the respective periods of observation, amounts of rVIIa purchased monthly averaged 42.6 mg and 21.8 mg, a 49% difference. Semiannual expenditures for rVIIa decreased approximately $110,000 following guideline implementation. Patient outcomes were similar.
A guideline based on currently available evidence can serve to sustain the clinical appropriateness of rVIIa therapy and substantially decrease costs.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
24 Views

Keywords

29 patients
 
49% difference
 
6-month observation periods
 
acute hemorrhage
 
advisory direction
 
available evidence
 
clinical appropriateness
 
evidence-based guideline
 
guideline implementation
 
inappropriate use
 
multidisciplinary task force
 
nonhemophiliac patients
 
off-label administration
 
Patient outcomes
 
respective periods
 
retrospective review
 
rVIIa use
 
rVIIa utilization
 
Semiannual expenditures
 
university hospital
 

Phillip S Owen