Electroencephalogram asymmetry and spectral power during sleep in the northern fur seal

UCLA & VA GLAHS, Sepulveda, CA 91343, USA.
Journal of Sleep Research (Impact Factor: 3.35). 06/2008; 17(2):154-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00639.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), a member of the Pinniped family, displays a highly expressed electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry during slow wave sleep (SWS), which is comparable with the unihemispheric sleep in cetaceans. In this study, we investigated the EEG asymmetry in the fur seal using spectral analysis. Four young (2-3 years old) seals were implanted with EEG electrodes for polygraphic sleep recording. In each animal, EEG spectral power in the frequency range of 1.2-16 Hz was computed in symmetrical cortical recordings over two consecutive nights. The degree of EEG asymmetry was measured by using the asymmetry index [AI = (L - R)/(L + R), where L and R are the spectral powers in the left and right hemispheres, respectively]. In fur seals, EEG asymmetry, as measured by the percent of 20-s epochs with absolute AI > 0.3 and >0.6, was expressed in the entire frequency range (1.2-16 Hz). The asymmetry was significantly greater during SWS (25.6-44.2% of all SWS epochs had an absolute AI > 0.3 and 2.1-12.2% of all epochs had AI > 0.6) than during quiet waking (11.0-20.3% and 0-1.9% of all waking epochs, respectively) and REM sleep (4.2-8.9% of all REM sleep epochs and no epochs, respectively). EEG asymmetry was recorded during both low- and high-voltage SWS, and was maximal in the range of 1.2-4 and 12-16 Hz. As shown in this study, the degree of EEG asymmetry and the frequency range in which it is expressed during SWS in fur seals are profoundly different from those of terrestrial mammals and birds.

9 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Fine scale foraging studies of northern fur seals are needed to identify foraging habitat and assess the degree of spatial overlap with commercial ,fisheries in the ,eastern Bering Sea. Previous approaches have successfully used radio and satellite telemetry to determine,movement,patterns and some at-sea locations of fur seals — but ,the resolution of the data has been too coarse to determine where ,seals successfully feed. We ,used a combination ,of established (radio and satellite transmitters) and new (dead-reckoner) tracking technologies to assess fine-scale feeding
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interleukin-1 beta (IL1) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) promote non-rapid eye movement sleep under physiological and inflammatory conditions. Additional cytokines are also likely involved but evidence is insufficient to conclude that they are sleep regulatory substances. Many of the symptoms induced by sleep loss, e.g. sleepiness, fatigue, poor cognition, enhanced sensitivity to pain, can be elicited by injection of exogenous IL1 or TNF. We propose that ATP, released during neurotransmission, acting via purine P2 receptors on glia releases IL1 and TNF. This mechanism may provide the means by which the brain keeps track of prior usage history. IL1 and TNF in turn act on neurons to change their intrinsic properties and thereby change input-output properties (i.e. state shift) of the local network involved. Direct evidence indicates that cortical columns oscillate between states, one of which shares properties with organism sleep. We conclude that sleep is a local use-dependent process influenced by cytokines and their effector molecules such as nitric oxide, prostaglandins and adenosine.
    Current pharmaceutical design 02/2008; 14(32):3408-16. DOI:10.2174/138161208786549281 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individual brain hemispheres are often specialized for specific aspects of a behavior. How both sides of the brain coordinate their output to produce a perfectly seamless behavior is not known. Songbirds appear to achieve this by rapidly switching back and forth between hemispheres.
    PLoS Biology 11/2008; 6(10):e269. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060269 · 9.34 Impact Factor
Show more