On estimating the exponent of power-law frequency distributions.

Department of Biology and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA.
Ecology (Impact Factor: 5.18). 05/2008; 89(4):905-12. DOI: 10.1890/07-1288.1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Power-law frequency distributions characterize a wide array of natural phenomena. In ecology, biology, and many physical and social sciences, the exponents of these power laws are estimated to draw inference about the processes underlying the phenomenon, to test theoretical models, and to scale up from local observations to global patterns. Therefore, it is essential that these exponents be estimated accurately. Unfortunately, the binning-based methods traditionally used in ecology and other disciplines perform quite poorly. Here we discuss more sophisticated methods for fitting these exponents based on cumulative distribution functions and maximum likelihood estimation. We illustrate their superior performance at estimating known exponents and provide details on how and when ecologists should use them. Our results confirm that maximum likelihood estimation outperforms other methods in both accuracy and precision. Because of the use of biased statistical methods for estimating the exponent, the conclusions of several recently published papers should be revisited.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Scaling is central to ecology and Earth system sciences. However, the importance of scale (i.e., resolution and extent) for understanding carbon dynamics across scales is poorly understood and quantified. We simulated carbon dynamics under a wide range of combinations of resolution (nine spatial resolutions of 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, 2 km, 5 km, 10 km, 20 km, 50 km, and 100 km) and extent (57 geospatial extents ranging from 108 to 1,247,034 km(2) ) in the southeastern United States to explore the existence of scale dependence of the simulated regional carbon balance. Results clearly show the existence of a critical threshold resolution for estimating carbon sequestration within a given extent and an error limit. Further, an invariant power law scaling relationship was found between the critical resolution and the spatial extent as the critical resolution is proportional to A(n) (n is a constant, and A is the extent). Scale criticality and the power law relationship might be driven by the power law probability distributions of land surface and ecological quantities including disturbances at landscape to regional scales. The current overwhelming practices without considering scale criticality might have largely contributed to difficulties in balancing carbon budgets at regional and global scales. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Global Change Biology 05/2014; 20(7):2240-2251. · 8.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new methodology is developed to extract tidal network from hydrodynamic conditions, and use data derived from numerical modelling or field observations to test the hypothesis that tidal networks are characterized by scale-invariant properties. Different tidal network configurations have been obtained from long-term numerical simulations in an idealized basin. These simulations show the influence of hydrodynamic conditions (tidal range, TR) and sediment (grain size sediment, D50) on the final configuration of the network. One of the signatures of scale- invariant behaviour is related to the presence of a power law relationship in the probability distribution of geometrical characteristics. For each model configuration and field site the probability distribution of drainage area and the drainage volume has been calculated, and in both cases tidal networks show scale invariant characteristics. After assessing the sensivity of the results, an energy expenditure analysis shows that tidal basins evolve towards a state with less morphodynamic activity, with a lower energy expenditure compare with the initial state.
    Water Resources Research 05/2014; 50(6):4585-4602. · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim An understanding of the relationship between forest biomass and climate is needed to predict the impacts of climate change on carbon stores. Biomass patterns have been characterized at geographically or climatically restricted scales, making it unclear if biomass is limited by climate in any general way at continental to global scales. Using a dataset spanning multiple climatic regions we evaluate the generality of published biomass–climate correlations. We also combine metabolic theory and hydraulic limits to plant growth to first derive and then test predictions for how forest biomass should vary with maximum individual tree biomass and the ecosystem water deficit.Location Temperate forests and dry, moist and wet tropical forests across North, Central and South America.Methods A forest biomass model was derived from allometric functions and power‐law size distributions. Biomass and climate were correlated using extensive forest plot (276 0.1‐ha plots), wood density and climate datasets. Climate variables included mean annual temperature, annual precipitation, their ratio, precipitation of the driest quarter, potential and actual evapotranspiration, and the ecosystem water deficit. The water deficit uniquely summarizes water balance by integrating water inputs from precipitation with water losses due to solar energy.Results Climate generally explained little variation in forest biomass, and mixed support was found for published biomass–climate relationships. Our theory indicated that maximum individual biomass governs forest biomass and is constrained by water deficit. Indeed, forest biomass was tightly coupled to maximum individual biomass and the upper bound of maximum individual biomass declined steeply with water deficit. Water deficit similarly constrained the upper bound of forest biomass, with most forests below the constraint.Main conclusions The results suggest that: (1) biomass–climate models developed at restricted geographic/climatic scales may not hold at broader scales; (2) maximum individual biomass is strongly related to forest biomass, suggesting that process‐based models should focus on maximum individual biomass; (3) the ecosystem water deficit constrains biomass, but realized biomass often falls below the constraint; such that (4) biomass is not strongly limited by climate in most forests so that forest biomass may not predictably respond to changes in mean climate.
    Global Ecology and Biogeography 01/2011; 20(5). · 7.22 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014