The 3′UTR 1188 A/C polymorphism in the interleukin-12p40 gene (IL-12B) is associated with lepromatous leprosy in the West of Mexico

Centro de Investigación en Inmunología y Dermatología, Departamento de Fisiología, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Immunology Letters (Impact Factor: 2.37). 06/2008; 118(2):148-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2008.03.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. IL-12 participates in the immune response against M. leprae by regulating T cell differentiation into the Th1-type response. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms have been identified in the IL-12 gene such as 3'UTR 1188 A/C polymorphism, which is associated with different diseases. However, the relationship of this polymorphism with the immune response in leprosy has not been explored. In this case-control study, we evaluated 44 patients with lepromatous leprosy (LL) and 51 healthy subjects (HS). We aimed to determine the relationship between 3'UTR 1188 A/C polymorphism of IL-12 p40, mRNA expression, and soluble IL-12 concentration in LL patients and HS. Genotype frequencies were 41% A/A, 36% A/C, and 23% C/C in LL patients, and 47% A/A, 49% A/C, and 4% C/C in HS (p<0.05). LL patients had a lower mRNA expression of IL-12 p40 gene, whereas HS had a higher expression level. Soluble IL-12 p40 concentration was higher in LL patients than in HS (p<0.05). IL-12 p70 concentration did not differ between groups, and IL-12 p40 concentration was not significantly correlated with mRNA expression in either group. These data suggest that IL-12 p40 3'UTR 1188 A/C polymorphism is associated with greater susceptibility to lepromatous leprosy in patients from western Mexico, independently of IL-12 p40 and p70 expression levels.

Download full-text


Available from: Lopez-Roa Rocio Ivette, Aug 25, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "The complex genetic regulation of the adaptive immune response resulting from the balance between different secreted cytokines is crucial for the outcome of the host-pathogen interactions, that is, elimination of the bacilli, development of the resistant form of leprosy (TT), or the more severe form (LL). This has been confirmed by the observation that polymorphisms of key cytokines genes, such as TNF (Santos et al. 2002; Sapkota et al., 2010; Cardoso et al. 2011), IL-12 (Alvarado-Navarro et al. 2008), IL-4 (Yang et al. 2011; Sampaio et al. 2012), IL-10, TGF-B, IL-6, and their respective receptors (Aggarwal et al. 2011) have been associated with susceptibility to and severity of leprosy. HLA-related gene polymorphisms have also been investigated in adaptive immunity against leprosy. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Considering that variability in immune response genes has been associated with susceptibility to leprosy and with disease severity, leprosy presents clinicopathological variants that are highly associated with the immune response, HLA-G has a well-recognized role in the modulation of the immune response, and polymorphisms at the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the HLA-G gene may influence HLA-G production, we studied the polymorphic sites at the 3' UTR of the HLA-G gene in leprosy and their association with disease severity. We evaluated by sequencing analysis the allele, genotype, and haplotype frequencies of the 3' UTR HLA-G polymorphic sites (14-bpINDEL/+3003C-T/+3010C-G/+3027A-C/+3035C-T/+3142C-G/+3187A-G/+3196C-G) in 146 individuals presenting reactive leprosy from a highly endemic area, and associated with bacillary load and the type of reactive leprosy. A total of 128 healthy subjects were also studied. Allele, genotype, and haplotype frequencies for the 3' UTR HLA-G polymorphisms in leprosy patients did not differ from those observed in healthy donors. The +3187A allele was responsible for protection against the development of multibacillary leprosy in a dominant model (AA + AG)/GG, OR = 0.11, P = 0.018), and the +3187A allele and +3187A-A genotype were overrepresented in type II reactive leprosy reaction. The effect of genetic factors on leprosy susceptibility may be hidden by environmental components in highly endemic areas. The HLA-G + 3187A polymorphic site, which is related to unstable mRNA production, was associated with the development of polar forms of leprosy and reactive leprosy reaction.
    09/2013; 1(3):123-30. DOI:10.1002/mgg3.14
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leprosy is a chronic but treatable infectious disease caused by the intracellular pathogen Mycobacterium leprae. Host immunity to M. leprae determines the diversity of clinical manifestations seen in patients, from tuberculoid leprosy with robust production of Th1-type cytokines to lepromatous disease, characterized by elevated levels of Th2-type cytokines and a suboptimal proinflammatory response. Previous reports have indicated that M. leprae is a poor activator of macrophages and dendritic cells in vitro. To understand whether M. leprae fails to elicit an optimal Th1 immune response or actively interferes with its induction, we have examined the early interactions between M. leprae and monocytes from healthy human donors. We found that, in naïve monocytes, M. leprae induced high levels of the negative regulatory molecules MCP-1 and interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), while suppressing IL-6 production through phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)-dependent mechanisms. In addition, low levels of proinflammatory cytokines were observed in association with reduced activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and delayed activation of IL-1beta-converting enzyme, ICE (caspase-1), in monocytes stimulated with M. leprae compared with Mycobacterium bovis BCG stimulation. Interestingly, although in itself a weak stimulator of cytokines, M. leprae primed the cells for increased production of tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-10 in response to a strongly inducing secondary stimulus. Taken together, our results suggest that M. leprae plays an active role to control the release of cytokines from monocytes by providing both positive and negative regulatory signals via multiple signaling pathways involving PI3K, NF-kappaB, and caspase-1.
    Infection and immunity 10/2009; 78(1):293-300. DOI:10.1128/IAI.00816-09 · 4.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the availability of effective treatment for several decades, leprosy remains an important medical problem in many regions of the world. Infection with Mycobacterium leprae can produce paucibacillary disease, characterized by well-formed granulomas and a Th1 T-cell response, or multibacillary disease, characterized by poorly organized cellular infiltrates and Th2 cytokines. These diametric immune responses confer states of relative resistance or susceptibility to leprosy, respectively, and have well-defined clinical manifestations. As a result, leprosy provides a unique opportunity to dissect the genetic basis of human in vivo immunity. A series of studies over the past 40 years suggests that host genes influence the risk of leprosy acquisition and the predilection for different clinical forms of the disease. However, a comprehensive, cellular, and molecular view of the genes and variants involved is still being assembled. In this article, we review several decades of human genetic studies of leprosy, including a number of recent investigations. We emphasize genetic analyses that are validated by the replication of the same phenotype in independent studies or supported by functional experiments demonstrating biological mechanisms of action for specific polymorphisms. Identifying and functionally exploring the genetic and immunological factors that underlie human susceptibility to leprosy have yielded important insights into M. leprae pathogenesis and are likely to advance our understanding of the immune response to other pathogenic mycobacteria. This knowledge may inform new treatment or vaccine strategies for leprosy or tuberculosis.
    Microbiology and molecular biology reviews: MMBR 12/2010; 74(4):589-620. DOI:10.1128/MMBR.00025-10 · 15.26 Impact Factor
Show more