Congenital pouch colon with duplicate bladder exstrophy

Department of Pediatric Surgery, RNT Medical College and M.B. Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan 31 3001, India.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.39). 06/2008; 43(5):E9-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.070
Source: PubMed


Congenital pouch colon, an unusual high anorectal malformation, is rarely associated with exstrophy variants. We describe a case of congenital pouch colon associated with duplicate bladder exstrophy, never reported before in literature. The relevant literature is reviewed, and the possible embryogenesis of this complex anomaly is suggested.

2 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management guidelines with regard to congenital pouch colon (CPC) are not clearly defined with regard to the type of pouch present. The aim of this study was to outline the management strategy and surgical approach to CPC using the Saxena-Mathur classification based on anatomical morphology of the pouch. During a 12-year period (1995-2007), 426 patients were surgically managed for anorectal malformations at the RNT Medical College, Udaipur. Congenital pouch colon was documented in 80 patients and categorized into 5 types according the anatomical morphology. The management strategy depended upon the location of the pouch and its condition at the time of the surgery. In type 1 and type 2 CPC, a 1-stage (pouch excision and pull-through) or 3-stage procedure (ileostomy, pouch-coloplasty with pull-through, and ileostomy closure) was performed depending on the condition of the pouch (ischemic or healthy). In type 3 and type 4 CPC, a 3-stage procedure (pouch excision with colostomy, pull-through, and colostomy closure) was performed in all patients. In type 5 CPC, a 3-stage procedure (distal pouch excision with proximal pouch-coloplasty with ileostomy, pull-through, and colostomy closure) was successful. Management of CPC patients according the Saxena-Mathur classification provides a well-defined algorithm in the surgical approach according to the anatomical morphology of the pouch.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 06/2009; 44(5):962-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.035 · 1.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is a rare form of high ano-rectal malformation (ARM) in which part of or the entire colon is replaced by a pouch with a fistula to the genito-urinary tract. According to the Saxena-Mathur classification CPC is divided into five types. Although plain abdominal radiographs are taken in infants with suspicion of CPC to detect large dilatation of the pouch, the determination of the type of CPC is made during surgical exploration. Since large variations in the length of normal colon are present in the various types, management strategy options can be determined only at the time of surgery. The aim of this study was to review abdominal radiographs of children with congenital pouch colon (CPC) and evaluate their value in determining the type of CPC prior to surgical exploration to assist pre-operative planning. Over a 12-year period (1995-2007), CPC was documented in 80 children (52 boys and 28 girls, age range 1 day-9 years, median 2.4 days) and retrospective analysis of plain abdominal radiographs of 77 children at the time of presentation was performed. Radiographic findings were correlated with surgical findings. Of 77 children, 5 were excluded from the study since the pouch colon was perforated. The direction of the pouch apex was correlated with surgical findings to determine the CPC type (P<0.0001, Fisher exact test). Type 1 (17/18) and type 2 CPC (18/18) were characterized by a single large pouch with the apex positioned in the left hypochondrium. In type 3 CPC (2/2) the pouch apex was directed towards the right hypochondrium. In type 4 CPC the apex of the pouch was directed towards the right hypochondrium (28/33); however in 5 children it was towards the left hypochondrium. In type 5 CPC (n=1) the radiograph was inconclusive. Plain abdominal radiographs have a predictive value in determining the type of CPC and obviating the need for an invertogram.
    Pediatric Radiology 10/2010; 40(10):1603-8. DOI:10.1007/s00247-010-1786-4 · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source

    10/2013; 2(4):48.