Article
Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients.
IVF Laboratory, IVI, Valencia, Spain.
Clinical and Translational Oncology (impact factor:
1.33).
06/2008;
10(5):268-73.
pp.268-73
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (5)
-
Chapter: Fertility Preservation in Gynecologic Cancers Patients
02/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-51-0166-6 -
Article: Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To perform a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of oocyte vitrification in terms of oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and pregnancy rates. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Private university-affiliated IVF center, university-based hospital. Patients recruited in randomized controlled trials considering oocyte vitrification as one of the experimental arms and slow freezing or fresh oocytes control as the other. Vitrification of human oocytes vs. slow freezing or fresh oocytes. Ongoing pregnancy rate; secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, embryo development, fertilization rate, and oocyte survival. Five eligible studies were finally included. They involved 4,282 vitrified oocytes, 3,524 fresh oocytes, and 361 slow-frozen oocytes between 2005 and 2009. The rates of ongoing pregnancy, top-quality embryo, embryo cleavage, and fertilization did not differ between the vitrification and the fresh oocyte groups. The oocyte survival rate was higher in vitrified vs. slow-frozen oocytes (odds ratio [OR] 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-3.32), although heterogeneity between studies was observed. The fertilization rate was higher in vitrified vs. slow-frozen oocytes (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07-2.11). Vitrification also resulted in a higher rate top-quality embryo (22.4% vs. 8.0%, OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.37-8.02) and embryo cleavage rate (day 2: 64.6% vs. 47.7%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.33-3.00; day 3: 53.0% vs. 33.3%, OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.32-3.85) as compared with slow freezing. Vitrification is an efficient method to preserve oocytes, although more large controlled clinical trials are needed to strengthen this conclusion.Fertility and sterility 06/2011; 96(2):277-85. · 3.97 Impact Factor -
Article: Fertility preservation in female cancer patients.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: With improved survival rates among cancer patients, fertility preservation is now being recognized as an issue of great importance. There are currently several methods of fertility preservation available in female cancer patients and the options and techniques via assisted reproduction and cryopreservation are increasing, but some are still experimental and continues to be evaluated. The established means of preserving fertility include embryo cryopreservation, gonadal shielding during radiation therapy, ovarian transposition, conservative gynecologic surgery such as radical trachelectomy, donor embryos/oocytes, gestational surrogacy, and adoption. The experimental methods include oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation, in vitro maturation, and ovarian suppression. With advances in methods for the preservation of fertility, providing information about risk of infertility and possible options of fertility preservation to all young patients with cancer, and discussing future fertility with them should be also considered as one of the important parts of consultation at the time of cancer diagnosis.ISRN obstetrics and gynecology 01/2012; 2012:807302.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
47 oocyte donors
57 recipients undergoing
693 mature metaphase II oocytes
Cancer patients
clinical outcome
Cryotop vitrification method
excellent survival rates
fresh oocytes
healthy babies
implantation rates
non-oncological patients
oncological patients
oncological therapy
oocyte vitrification
ovarian stimulation
report results
reproductive technology
slow cooling procedures
study population
viable option