Quality of Life as reported by school children and their parents: a cross-sectional survey.

The Norwegian University of Technology and Science (NTNU), Regional Centre of Child and Adolescent Mental Health MTFS N-7489, Dept, of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry St, Olav Hospital, 7000 Trondheim, Norway.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (Impact Factor: 2.27). 01/2008; 6:34. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-34
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Comprehensive evidence exists regarding the discrepancy between children's reports and parents' by proxy reports on emotional and behavioural problems. However, little is yet known about factors influencing the extent to which child self- and parent by proxy reports differ in respect of child Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of the study was to investigate the degree of discrepancy between child and parent by proxy reports as measured by two different QoL instruments.
A representative Norwegian sample of 1997 school children aged 8-16 years, and their parents were studied using the Inventory of Life Quality (ILC) and the 'Kinder Lebensqualität Fragebogen' (KINDL). Child and parent reports were compared by t-test, and correlations were calculated by Pearson product moment coefficient. Psychometric aspects were examined in regard to both translated QoL instruments (internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients).
Parents evaluated the QoL of their children significantly more positively than did the children. Correlations between mother-child and father-child reports were significant (p < 0.01) and similar but low to moderate (r = 0.32; and r = 0.30, respectively, for the KINDL, and r = 0.30 and r = 0.26, respectively, for the ILC). Mother and father reports correlated moderately highly (r = 0.54 and r = 0.61 for the KINDL and ILC, respectively). No significant differences between correlations of mother-daughter/son and father-daughter/son pairs in regard to reported child QoL were observed on either of the two instruments.
In the present general population sample, parents reported higher child QoL than did their children. Concordance between child and parent by proxy report was low to moderate. The level of agreement between mothers and fathers in regard to their child's QoL was moderate. No significant impact of parent and child gender in regard to agreement in ratings of child QoL was found. Both the child and parent versions of the Norwegian translations of the KINDL and ILC can be used in surveys of community populations, but in regard to the self-report of 9-10 years old children, only the KINDL total QoL scale or the ILC are recommended.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To explore subjective and proxy reported QoL (Quality of Life) in children and adolescents surviving cancer three years after diagnosis compared with healthy controls. Case-control study including 50 children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer between January 1, 1993 and January 1, 2003 and treated at the Paediatric Department of St. Olav's University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway. Data were collected using The Inventory of Life Quality in Children and Adolescents (ILC) and the KINDL QoL questionnaires (parent and self-reports), as well as by collecting data for any somatic late effects and psychological problems from the medical records of children surviving cancer. Adolescents surviving cancer as a group assessed their QoL as similar to that of their peers. However, adolescents surviving brain tumours or those with late effects reported lower QoL and an increased number of QoL domains perceived as problematic, even many years after diagnosis and treatment. Parents generally report a poorer QoL for their children surviving cancer and a greater number of QoL domains experienced as problematic compared with parent controls. To improve the child's total functioning and well-being we conclude that when planning long-term follow-up care, rehabilitation of children and adolescents with cancer, especially for survivors with brain tumours, and with late effects should particularly take into account their subjectively perceived and proxy reported QoL, in addition to their psychological problems and psychosocial functioning.
    European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 09/2011; 16(2):185-93. · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluates self- and proxy-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The study also compares HRQOL in ASD patients with a healthy control sample and a psychiatric reference sample. 42 children and adolescents (39 male, mean age: 12.7 ± 2.6 years, mean IQ: 100.5 ± 20.7) with the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their parents completed the Inventory for the Assessment of Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents (ILK). Mean ILK LQ 0-28 scores were 20.6 (± 4.6) (self-report version) and 18.2 (± 4.0) (proxy version). Compared to a reference sample, mean ILK scores from the ASD sample were at the 47th percentile (self-report) and the 33rd percentile (proxy). Compared to children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders, self-reported ILK scores correlated with the 69th percentile, and proxy-reported ILK scores correlated with the 67th percentile. Self-reported HRQOL was significantly higher than proxy-reported HRQOL. No significant correlation was found between HRQOL and age, IQ, or autistic symptoms. HRQOL in children and adolescents with ASD seems to be better than in other psychiatric disorders, but lower than in healthy controls.
    Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 03/2011; 39(2):123-31. · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A number of health-related quality of life instruments for children and adolescents have been developed and used in European countries during recent years. However, few well-validated instruments have been translated into Norwegian. As part of a larger investigation about pain and health-related quality of life, the KIDSCREEN-52, a cross-cultural 10-scale questionnaire, was translated into Norwegian. The aim of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the first Norwegian version of KIDSCREEN, particularly reliability and construct validity. A cross-sectional study was carried out, and a cluster sample of 20 randomly selected schools was drawn. The final study sample encompassed 1123 children and adolescents, aged 8-18 years. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was examined by confirmatory factor analysis, and by analysing whether the KIDSCREEN scales correlated with comparable KINDL scales, another health-related quality of life instrument. The analyses were conducted using SPSS (16.0) and Lisrel (8.7). The Cronbach's alpha value was above 0.80 for all KIDSCREEN scales, suggesting good internal consistency reliability for the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that most of the KIDSCREEN scales fit the data well. Fit statistics for the 10-factor model were satisfactory, although some scales displayed residual covariance. Several confirmatory factor analysis models were fitted to the data, and the model specified according to the 10-dimensional KIDSCREEN-52 measurement model with correlated first-order factors fitted the data well (RMSEA=0.04; CFI=0.99). The KIDSCREEN scales correlated sufficiently highly with comparable KINDL scales. The results of the present study indicate that the Norwegian version of the KIDSCREEN-52 seems to work well in a Norwegian context, and is a valid and reliable generic health-related quality of life instrument. It is considered appropriate for screening in the public health area, for example, in school health care.
    International journal of nursing studies 11/2010; 48(5):573-81. · 1.91 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014