Testing of silicon nitride ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (Impact Factor: 2.31). 06/2008; 87(2):447-54. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31123
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Modern ceramic bearings used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) consist of a femoral head (ball) articulating inside a hemispherical acetabular cup (socket); the ball and socket are made of alumina (Al(2)O(3)) and Al(2)O(3)-based composite materials. In the present study, total hip bearings were made from a different ceramic material, silicon nitride (Si(3)N(4)), by sintering and hot isostatic pressing of powders. The resulting material had improved mechanical properties over modern Al(2)O(3) THA bearings, with a flexural strength of 920 +/- 70 MPa, a Weibull modulus of 19, and a fracture toughness of 10 +/- 1 MPa m(1/2). Unlike zirconia-based ceramics that have also been used in THA, accelerated aging of Si(3)N(4) did not adversely affect the flexural strength. In simulated wear tests, Si(3)N(4) acetabular cups produced low-volumetric wear whether articulating against Si(3)N(4) or cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral heads. The results of this investigation suggest that Si(3)N(4) may allow improved THA bearings that combine the reliability of metal femoral heads with the low wear advantages of ceramic materials.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a retrospective evaluation of 1369 hip arthroplasties performed using the Bicon-Plus cups and SL-Plus stems, differing only in the bearing combination. Four bearing combination groups were used: metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) group with 587 hips, ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) group with 161 hips, metal-on-metal (MoM) group with 322 hips and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) group with 299 hips. The mean follow-up was 11.5years (4.1 to 15.0). Radiological evaluation was performed on implants failed due to aseptic loosening. The survival for prosthesis with revision for any reason at ten years was 96.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.3 to 97.9) for MoP, 98.1% (CI 95.9 to 100) for CoP, 90.2% (CI 86.8 to 93.6) for MoM, and 95.6% (CI 93.0 to 98.2) for CoC. Survival for aseptic loosening was also determined.
    The Journal of arthroplasty 04/2013; · 1.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Total hip arthroplasty has shown excellent results in decreasing pain and improving function in patients with degenerative disease of the hip. Improvements in prosthetic materials, designs and implant fixation have now resulted in wear of the bearing surface being the limitation of this technology, and a number of hard-on-hard couples have been introduced to address this concern. The purpose of this article is to review the origins, development, survival rates and potential advantages and disadvantages of the following hard-on-hard bearings for total hip arthroplasty: metal-on-metal standard total hip arthroplasty; metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty, ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty; and ceramic-on-metal bearings. Improvements in the manufacturing of metal-on-metal bearings over the past 50 years have resulted in implants that provide low wear rates and allow for the use of large femoral heads. However, concerns remain regarding elevated serum metal ion levels, potential teratogenic effects and potentially devastating adverse local tissue reactions, whose incidence and pathogenesis remains unclear. Modern total hip resurfacing has shown excellent outcomes over 10 years in the hands of experienced surgeons. Current ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have demonstrated excellent survival with exceptionally low wear rates and virtually no local adverse effects. Concerns remain for insertional chipping, in vivo fracture and the variable incidence of squeaking. Contemporary ceramic-on-metal interfaces are in the early stages of clinical use, with little data reported to date. Hard-on-hard bearings for total hip arthroplasty have improved dramatically over the past 50 years. As bearing designs continue to improve with new and modified materials and improved manufacturing techniques, it is likely that the use of hard-on-hard bearings will continue to increase, especially in young and active patients.
    Expert Review of Medical Devices 03/2011; 8(2):187-207. · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comparison of Zr61Ti2Cu25Al12 metallic glass with the Ti6Al4V alloy, 316 L stainless steel and CoCrMo alloy for the specific wear rate and coefficient of friction, tested in air, deionized water, PBS and DMEM + FBS media under loading of 25 N.Figure optionsView in workspace
    Materials Science and Engineering: C. 01/2014; 37:292–304.