Victimisation and suicide ideation in the TRAILS study: specific vulnerabilities of victims

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.67). 06/2008; 49(8):867-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01900.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Scientific studies have provided some support for a link between being a victim of bullying and suicide ideation. We examine whether (1) parental psychopathology and (2) feelings of rejection (at home and at school) exacerbate vulnerability to suicide ideation in victims of bullying (pure victims and bully-victims).
Data were from a population-based cohort study of Dutch children (n = 1526, mean age = 12.29 years). Using peer nominations, three groups were established: (1) victim only; (2) bully-victims (children who are victims and who also bully others); (3) uninvolved. Self-report data on suicide ideation were obtained using two items from the Youth Self-Report (Achenbach, 1991). Parental internalizing and externalizing disorders were assessed, as were self-reported feelings of rejection at home and social well-being among classmates.
The association between victimization and suicide ideation was moderated by parental internalizing disorders (but not externalizing disorders) and feelings of rejection at home. Victims (but not bully-victims) with parents with internalizing disorders reported elevated levels of suicide ideation compared to children uninvolved in bullying. Victims feeling more rejected at home also reported more suicide ideation. There were no overall sex differences in suicide ideation. Surprisingly, bully-victims did not report higher levels of suicide ideation compared to children uninvolved in bullying.
Parental internalizing disorders and feelings of rejection at home confer a specific vulnerability for suicide ideation among victims of bullying.


Available from: Johan Ormel, Jul 23, 2014
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bullying has been identified as a potential contributing factor in youth suicide. This issue has been highlighted in recent widely publicized media reports, worldwide, in which deceased youth were bullied. We report on an observational study conducted to determine the frequency of bullying as a contributing factor to youth suicide. Coroner records were reviewed for all suicide deaths in youth aged between 10 and 19 in the city of Toronto from 1998 to 2011. Data abstracted were recent stressors (including bullying), clinical variables, such as the presence of mental illness, demographics, and methods of suicide. Ninety-four youth suicides were included in the study. The mean age was 16.8 years, and 70.2% were male. Bullying was present in 6 deaths (6.4%), and there were no deaths where online or cyberbullying was detected. Bullying was the only identified contributing factor in fewer than 5 deaths. The most common stressors identified were conflict with parents (21.3%), romantic partner problems (17.0%), academic problems (10.6%), and criminal and (or) legal problems (10.6%). Any stressor or mental and (or) physical illness was detected in 78.7% of cases. Depression was detected in 40.4% of cases. Our study highlights the need to view suicide in youth as arising from a complex interplay of various biological, psychological, and social factors of which bullying is only one. It challenges simple cause-and-effect models that may suggest that suicide arises from anyone factor, such as bullying.
    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 12/2014; 59(12):632-8. · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bullying is a significant public health problem associated with numerous short- and long-term psychological effects on adolescents. Of particular concern is the association between bullying involvement and suicidal ideation and behaviors. Cross-sectional studies have found that youth involved in bullying are at 1-10 times greater risk of reporting suicidal ideation and behaviors compared to uninvolved youth (Kim & Leventhal, 2008). Research to date, however, has been limited in a number of respects. For instance, there is mixed evidence about how the specific nature of bullying involvement (e.g., bully, victim, bully/victim) relates to the risk for suicidal ideation (Herba et al. 1998; Rigby & Slee, 1999). Similarly, it is unclear whether there are sex differences in the association between bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors (e.g., Klomek et al., 2009; Laukkanen et al., 2005). Finally, while review articles on this topic exist (e.g., Kim & Leventhal, 2008), they have included studies that measure forms of peer victimization that are not necessarily bullying (e.g., studies using YRBS violence items prior to the inclusion of a bullying-specific item in 2010). The goal of this meta-analysis was to examine the association between bullying and suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors using a strict definition of bullying, and to assess moderators of this association (e.g., bullying subtype, sex). First, a systematic search of the literature was performed using search terms in three broad categories: bullying, suicide, and adolescents, with variations of each term included. A total of 350 articles were retrieved, and then were reviewed based on our study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary inclusion criteria were: (1) the study assessed both bullying and suicidality at a single time point; (2) participants reported on experiences occurring before age 18; and (3) peer-to-peer bullying was examined. Articles not written in English and those that did not provide adequate statistical information for the meta-analysis were excluded. This resulted in a final sample of 29 studies. Each article was coded by two individuals, and coders met to reach consensus and document final codes. Articles were coded on a wide range of indicators, including sample characteristics, measurement of bullying and suicide, and statistics for the association between bullying and suicidal ideation/behaviors. To date, initial analyses on a sample of 26 studies have been completed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis statistical software. A preliminary review of data indicates that of the included studies, seven used U.S. samples and the remaining 22 used international samples. The number of participants per study ranged widely, with a low of 143 (Viljoen et al., 2005) and a high of 31,294 (Fleming & Jacobsen, 2009). The initial effect size estimate of the link between bullying victimization and suicidality is 1.74, and the effect size estimate for bullying perpetration and suicidality is 1.59. This meta-analysis will yield valuable information that can be translated into improving prevention programs and providing mental health services for youth in need.
    Society for Prevention Research 21nd Annual Meeting 2015; 05/2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Bullying is a significant problem in schools and measuring this concept remains problematic. The purposes of this study were to (1) identify the published self-report measures developed to assess youth bullying; (2) evaluate their psychometric properties and instrument characteristics; and (3) evaluate the quality of identified psychometric papers evaluating youth bullying measures. METHODSA systematic review of the literature was conducted using 4 electronic databases. Data extraction and appraisal of identified instruments were completed using a standardized method and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTSThirty-one articles describing 27 self-report instruments were evaluated in our analysis. Quality assessments ranged from 18% to 91%, with 6 papers reaching or exceeding a quality score of 75%. Limited evidence supporting the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of existing youth bullying measures was identified. CONCLUSIONS Evidence supporting the psychometric soundness of the instruments identified was limited. Many measures were in early development and additional evaluation is necessary to validate their psychometric properties. A pool of instruments possesses acceptable initial psychometric dependability for selected assessment purposes. These findings have significant implications for assessing youth bullying and designing and evaluating school-based interventions.
    Journal of School Health 12/2014; 84(12):819-43. DOI:10.1111/josh.12210 · 1.66 Impact Factor