Article

Victimisation and suicide ideation in the TRAILS study: Specific vulnerabilities of victims

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.67). 06/2008; 49(8):867-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01900.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Scientific studies have provided some support for a link between being a victim of bullying and suicide ideation. We examine whether (1) parental psychopathology and (2) feelings of rejection (at home and at school) exacerbate vulnerability to suicide ideation in victims of bullying (pure victims and bully-victims).
Data were from a population-based cohort study of Dutch children (n = 1526, mean age = 12.29 years). Using peer nominations, three groups were established: (1) victim only; (2) bully-victims (children who are victims and who also bully others); (3) uninvolved. Self-report data on suicide ideation were obtained using two items from the Youth Self-Report (Achenbach, 1991). Parental internalizing and externalizing disorders were assessed, as were self-reported feelings of rejection at home and social well-being among classmates.
The association between victimization and suicide ideation was moderated by parental internalizing disorders (but not externalizing disorders) and feelings of rejection at home. Victims (but not bully-victims) with parents with internalizing disorders reported elevated levels of suicide ideation compared to children uninvolved in bullying. Victims feeling more rejected at home also reported more suicide ideation. There were no overall sex differences in suicide ideation. Surprisingly, bully-victims did not report higher levels of suicide ideation compared to children uninvolved in bullying.
Parental internalizing disorders and feelings of rejection at home confer a specific vulnerability for suicide ideation among victims of bullying.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Johan Ormel, Jul 23, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
140 Views
  • Source
    • "Similar results can be seen by the researchers Markus and associates (Markus et al, 2003), where it is again established that children in elementary school with anxious reactions had parents who reflected the rejecting parenting style. In addition, the results of the research conducted by Herba and her colleagues (Herba et al, 2008) showed that adolescents whose parents preferred the rejecting parenting style, tend to think about suicide. The research by Baumrind (Baumrind, 1991) showed that the psychoactive substances abuse in the adolescence period is correlated to the rejecting parenting style. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we considered family functioning from a systemic perspective, while we try to point out the relationship between patterns of family functioning, parenting style of the parents and adolescents’ addiction diseases. The research was conducted with the aim to determine a correlation between a functionality of family systems, parenting style of parents and presence of adolescents’ substance abuse problems (alcoholism and drug addiction). A FACES III (Olson, Portner & Levi,1985) and EMBU (Arrindell, 2005) scales were used in order to establish patterns of family functioning and of parenting style of the parents. Two groups of adolescents were examined: 50 adolescents with addiction diseases (alcoholism and drug addiction) who had ambulance or hospital treatment at the Clinic for Mental Health Protection in Nis and 50 adolescents who do not have any problems with addiction. The results of the research showed that there are statistically significant differences between these two groups: in terms of the patterns of family functioning, it could be noted that the patterns of disengaged family functioning, parenting style based on rejection and overprotecting and a significant presence of incomplete family systems were much more dominant for adolescents with addiction diseases. Also, results showed that there is a correlation between family functioning, parenting style and the presence of addiction diseases which shows the need of family support in order to accomplish adequately parenting function. In organizing certain interventions in the family system it is important to have in mind that separately focused interventions which are directed towards parenting, have short-dated effects and that influences directed towards the functioning of the whole family system are much more adequate, which is actually our approach in this paper.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 04/2014; 128:281–287. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.157
  • Source
    • "These five variables were standardized and combined into one scale with an internal consistency of 0.84 (Veenstra et al., 2005). Several TRAILS studies used this SES-measure (Amone-P'Olak et al., 2009; Herba et al., 2008; Veenstra et al., 2008). In the present study, SES may act as a confounder, since SES is related to both parenting factors and externalizing behavior problems (Marsman et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although externalizing behavior problems show in general a high stability over time, the course of externalizing behavior problems may vary from individual to individual. Our main goal was to investigate the predictive role of parenting on externalizing behavior problems. In addition, we investigated the potential moderating role of gender and genetic risk (operationalized as familial loading of externalizing behavior problems (FLE), and presence or absence of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) 7-repeat and 4-repeat allele, respectively). Perceived parenting (rejection, emotional warmth, and overprotection) and FLE were assessed in a population-based sample of 1768 10- to 12-year-old adolescents. Externalizing behavior problems were assessed at the same age and 212 years later by parent report (CBCL) and self-report (YSR). DNA was extracted from blood samples. Parental emotional warmth predicted lower, and parental overprotection and rejection predicted higher levels of externalizing behavior problems. Whereas none of the parenting factors interacted with gender and the DRD4 7-repeat allele, we did find interaction effects with FLE and the DRD4 4-repeat allele. That is, the predictive effect of parental rejection was only observed in adolescents from low FLE families and the predictive effect of parental overprotection was stronger in adolescents not carrying the DRD4 4-repeat allele.
    Psychiatry Research 08/2013; 209(1):66–73. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.10.022 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "We should be careful, though, in attributing differences found in studies to real life differences in prevalence of bullying, as variations between different investigations could depend on the defining criteria used and the population studied. We did, however, keep our conceptual and operational definitions in line with mainstream definitions from the field (Bowes et al. 2009; Herba et al. 2008; Olweus 1994; Salmivalli 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PTSD symptoms related to school bullying have rarely been investigated, and never in national samples. We used data from a national survey to investigate this among students from grades 8 and 9 (n = 963). The prevalence estimates of exposure to bullying were within the range of earlier research findings. Multinomial logistic regression showed that boys were 2.27 times more likely to be exposed to frequent bullying than girls. A latent variable second-order model demonstrated an association between frequency of bullying exposure and PTSD symptoms (beta = 0.49). This relationship was not moderated by gender. However, the average levels of PTSD symptoms as well as clinical range symptoms were higher for girls. For all bullied students, 27.6% of the boys and 40.5% of the girls had scores within the clinical range. A mimic model showed that youth who identify as being both a bully and a victim of bullying were more troubled than those who were victims only. Our findings support the idea that exposure to bullying is a potential risk factor for PTSD symptoms among students. Future research could investigate whether the same holds for PTSD through diagnostic procedures, but this will depend on whether or not bullying is decided to comply with the DSM-IV classification of trauma required for diagnosis. Results are discussed with regard to their implications for school interventions.
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 03/2012; 40(6):901-11. DOI:10.1007/s10802-012-9620-0 · 3.09 Impact Factor
Show more