Article

How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies?

Fetal-Neonatal Neurology Research Program, Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.74). 07/2008; 190(6):1637-43. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3036
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The first objective of our study was to describe the prevalence and spectrum of posterior fossa anomalies over 5 years in a major fetal care center where the referral diagnosis (by fetal sonography) was investigated by fetal MRI and, if confirmed, by postnatal MRI if possible. The second objective was to assess the accuracy with which fetal MRI predicts postnatal MRI findings in this population.
We retrospectively identified all cases of suspected fetal posterior fossa anomalies referred to our center from 2002 through 2006. We reviewed maternal, fetal, neonatal, and follow-up records of all cases and fetal and early postnatal imaging studies.
Of the 90 cases of suspected fetal posterior fossa anomalies (by fetal sonography) referred over the study period, 60 (67%) were confirmed by fetal MRI. Of 42 live-born infants, 39 (93%) underwent postnatal MRI. There was complete agreement in fetal and postnatal MRI diagnoses in 23 infants (59%). In 16 cases (41%), fetal and postnatal MRI diagnoses disagreed; postnatal MRI excluded fetal MRI diagnoses in six cases (15%) and revealed additional anomalies in 10 cases (26%).
Although a valuable adjunct to fetal sonography in cases of suspected posterior fossa anomaly, current fetal MRI, particularly in early gestation, has limitations in accurately predicting postnatal MRI abnormalities. Advancing the accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of posterior fossa anomalies will require greater understanding of normal brain development and improved tissue resolution of fetal MRI. During the interim, our findings strongly support the need for postnatal MRI follow-up in cases with suspected posterior fossa anomalies by fetal MRI.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
104 Views
  • Topics in magnetic resonance imaging: TMRI 12/2011; 22(6):271-81.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Aim: To present an experience with twin pregnancies underlining the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on diagnosis and management. Methods: There were 17 cases of twin pregnancies: nine monochorionic [including four monochorionic diamniotic and five monochorionic monoamniotic (conjoined twins)] and eight dichorionic. The MRI examinations were performed between 19 and 39 weeks of gestational age in two centers using 1.5 T scanners (GE Signa Excite and GE Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA), always after ultrasound (US). In the first period of our activity, SSFSE sequence in T2-weighted images (SSFSE/T2WI) was the main diagnostic tool supported by TSE or GRE T1-weighted images (T1WI). After upgrading the scanners, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), steady-state free precession (FIESTA), and echoplanar GRE imaging (EPIGRE) became available. Results: In 11 cases (64.7%), MRI was superior to US and supplied additional information, including two cases in which pathology of the second twin suspected on US was ruled out on the basis of MRI. In six cases (35.3%) MRI confirmed US diagnosis and brought no new data. Conclusion: MRI offers more detailed assessment of fetal pathology in cases of twin pregnancies, including conjoined twins, in which sonographic evaluation is more difficult than in single cases.
    Journal of Perinatal Medicine 04/2013; · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The size of the posterior fossa (PF) is a significant parameter in diagnosing PF malformations. In this study nomograms of PF dimensions in normal foetuses, assessed in the median plane in the second and third trimesters, were constructed. Fetuses diagnosed with PF abnormalities were studied concerning the created tables of normal PF development. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of 378 healthy foetuses of low-risk singleton pregnancies between 15 and 35 weeks was performed. The PF size was evaluated in the median head plane using 3D-MPR display. All sonographic volumes were obtained by sagittal acquisition using a transabdominal or transvaginal probe. The borders of the PF were defined from the clivus to the tentorium and from the occipital bone to the level of the upper mesencephalic edge. The measured PF parameters included the Posterior Fossa Area (PFA), the Posterior Fossa Perimeter (PFP), the Tecto-Occipital Distance (TOD), and the Clivo-Tentorial Distance (CTD). The measurements were plotted on growth tables according to the gestational age. Thirty-nine foetuses diagnosed with PF malformations were analyzed by calculating the z-scores of the PFA, PFP, TOD, and CTD using the developed nomograms. RESULTS: Of the 378 initially included examinations, 281 were selected due to adequate visualization of the PF borders, resulting in an overall feasibility rate of 74.3% for PF median plane morphometry. A linear growth pattern with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.97, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.95 was found for PFA, PFP, TOD, and CTD, respectively (P<0.001 for each). Chiari II malformation (CM-II) and Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) showed the most prominent impact on the PF size. PFA z-scores exceeded 2.6 in all five DWM cases and were below -2.66 in all eleven CM-II cases. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic evaluation of the foetal PF size in the median plane is feasible. The constructed nomograms provide reference data that may be helpful, when evaluating PF congenital malformations.
    Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 05/2013; · 3.56 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
54 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014