Article
Synergistic toxic effects of zinc pyrithione and copper to three marine species: Implications on setting appropriate water quality criteria.
The Swire Institute of Marine Science, Division of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Marine Pollution Bulletin (impact factor:
2.5).
01/2008;
57(6-12):616-23.
DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.03.041
pp.616-23
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Risks of using antifouling biocides in aquaculture.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Biocides are chemical substances that can deter or kill the microorganisms responsible for biofouling. The rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry is having a significant impact on the marine ecosystems. As the industry expands, it requires the use of more drugs, disinfectants and antifoulant compounds (biocides) to eliminate the microorganisms in the aquaculture facilities. The use of biocides in the aquatic environment, however, has proved to be harmful as it has toxic effects on the marine environment. Organic booster biocides were recently introduced as alternatives to the organotin compounds found in antifouling products after restrictions were imposed on the use of tributyltin (TBT). The replacement products are generally based on copper metal oxides and organic biocides. The biocides that are most commonly used in antifouling paints include chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, DCOIT (4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, Sea-nine 211(®)), Diuron, Irgarol 1051, TCMS pyridine (2,3,3,6-tetrachloro-4-methylsulfonyl pyridine), zinc pyrithione and Zineb. There are two types of risks associated with the use of biocides in aquaculture: (i) predators and humans may ingest the fish and shellfish that have accumulated in these contaminants and (ii) the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. This paper provides an overview of the effects of antifouling (AF) biocides on aquatic organisms. It also provides some insights into the effects and risks of these compounds on non-target organisms.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 01/2012; 13(2):1541-60. · 2.60 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
antifouling paints
appropriate water quality criteria
combined effects
combined toxicity
compelling synergistic effects
contour
copper pyrithione
diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana
environmentally realistic concentrations
isobologram interaction parameter lambda>1
marine organisms
non-parametric response surface
polychaete larvae Hydroides elegans
precious marine resources
strong synergistic effect
synergistic effects
test species
toxicity data
tributyltin
Zinc pyrithione