Article

Reduced Stress-Sensitivity or Increased Reward Experience: The Psychological Mechanism of Response to Antidepressant Medication

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 7.83). 06/2008; 34(4):923-31. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.66
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Depression has often been associated with increased negative affect reactivity to stress (Stress-Sensitivity) and reduced capacity to experience pleasure or positive affect (Reward Experience). To date, no studies have prospectively examined changes in Stress-Sensitivity and Reward Experience following antidepressant treatment. The sample included 83 depressed patients and 22 healthy controls. A randomized controlled trial was carried out with patients receiving either imipramine or placebo for 6 weeks. At baseline and 6 weeks, patients and controls participated in an Experience Sampling procedure, prospectively measuring ecologically valid daily life appraisals of activities and mood states. The course of depression was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Multilevel linear regression analyses showed that patients had higher negative and lower positive appraisals of activities than controls. In addition, patients showed increased Stress-Sensitivity (negative affect reactivity to negatively appraised activities). Treatment with imipramine decreased Stress-Sensitivity and increased Reward Experience (positive affect reactivity to positively appraised activities). Changes in Stress-Sensitivity and Reward Experience were in part reducible to changes in the process of activity appraisal itself. However, increase in Reward Experience, but not decrease in Stress-Sensitivity, discriminated between patients who responded and those who did not, independent of changes in the process of activity appraisal itself. Response to treatment in depression may be conditional on restoration of hedonic capacity, the cerebral substrate of which requires further study in relation to antidepressant response. A search for (synergistic) antidepressant therapies specifically targeting ability to experience reward may be warranted.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nancy Nicolson, Aug 14, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
170 Views
    • "Harmer et al., 2009; Rawlings et al., 2010), and recent studies suggest that changes in positive rather than negative emotions may be important in predicting recovery from depression (Cohn et al., 2009; Wichers et al., 2009, 2010). For example, recovery from depression was associated with an increase in the ability to experience reward in daily life (Wichers et al., 2009). A high ability to experience positive emotions in daily life was also associated with increased resilience against the development of affective symptoms (Wichers et al., 2010), with positive, but not negative, emotions predicting psychological resilience (Cohn et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early improvement in positive emotions-more than decreases in negative emotions-was highly predictive of treatment response in an ecologically valid prospective manner. This result needs replication with simpler assessments to determine whether it can be translated into clinical practice. 2049 adult depressed outpatients receiving agomelatine were assessed at inclusion, week 2, and week 6 using the clinician-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Sheehan Disability Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale, and Multidimensional Assessment of Thymic States (MATHYS), an auto-questionnaire rating the frequency of emotions, including sadness and joy, over the previous week. Joy and sadness had a relatively low correlation coefficient at baseline (r=-0.277), joy (r=-0.160) being less correlated with clinical severity than sadness (r=0.317). An increase in joy at week 2 had higher specificity (85.04%) and positive predictive value (70.55%) for treatment response than decreased sadness (57.92% and 66.04%, respectively), and the global capacity of the former to predict remission, either clinical (Yule Q coefficient, 39.96%) or functional (44.35%), was even better compared to the prediction of clinical response (37.38%). MATHYS retrospectively assesses emotions, with five possible ratings only, relying on self-rated frequencies. With only a 6-week follow-up, conclusions are limited to short-term aspects of clinical and functional remission. Early improvement in joy during the first 2 weeks of treatment is strongly specific for treatment response and remission. The frequency of joy captures the predictivity and may deserve further study regarding inclusion in depressive rating scales. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 06/2015; 185:97-103. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.019 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This study examined the effects of repeated lithium treatment on the responses to palatable food in rats exposed to a chronic stress procedure that consistently disrupts the competence to avoid aversive stimuli and operate to obtain a positive reinforcer (Gambarana et al., 2001). Stress-induced escape deficit and the reduced competence to acquire VAB or sucrose SA mimic respectively the increased negative affect reactivity to stress (Wichers et al., 2009) and the reduced positive affect (anhedonia ) in depressed patients (Heller et al., 2009 ; Wichers et al., 2009). In rats these two behavioural deficits can be dissociated, as animals that have acquired VAB develop a clear-cut escape deficit when exposed to unavoidable stressors, yet their discriminative performance is not affected (Ghiglieri et al., 1997). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behavioural and neurochemical responses to palatable food exposure represent an index of hedonic competence. In rats, a palatable meal increases extra-neuronal dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS) that confers to it incentive salience and reinforcing value. Repeated stress exposure decreases dopamine output and impairs the NAcS dopaminergic response to palatable food and the competence to acquire a vanilla sugar (VS)-reinforced instrumental behaviour [VS-sustained appetitive behaviour (VAB)]. Moreover, chronic stress exposure disrupts reactivity to aversive stimuli. A 3-wk treatment with lithium, the gold-standard treatment in bipolar disorder, tonically reduces NAcS dopamine output and the reactivity to aversive stimuli. However, it does not affect the dopaminergic response to VS and the competence to acquire VAB. This study investigated whether repeated lithium administration is endowed with anti-anhedonic activity. The NAcS dopaminergic response to VS and the competence to acquire VAB and sucrose self-administration (SA), in terms of fixed-ratio (FR)1, FR5 and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement, were studied in saline or lithium-treated groups of non-food-deprived rats exposed or not to repeated unavoidable stress. Chronic stress exposure impaired the NAcS dopaminergic response to VS, acquisition of VAB and sucrose SA, in terms of FR1 and FR5 schedules of reinforcement and breaking point score. Repeated lithium treatment restored these parameters to control group values, even when treatment began in rats already showing an anhedonia-like condition. Since the breaking point defines the reinforcement efficacy of a hedonic stimulus, the present data suggest that lithium treatment is endowed with anti-anhedonic activity in rats.
    The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 01/2013; 16(07):1-11. DOI:10.1017/S1461145712001654 · 5.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Participants rated to what extent statements as " I prefer doing something else " or " I am skilled at this activity " applied to the current activity on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 not at all to 7 very much. Consistent with previous studies (Lardinois, Lataster, Mengelers , Van Os, & Myin–Germeys, 2011; Wichers et al., 2009) a composite score of several appraisals ( " I would rather do something else, " " this activity requires effort, " and " I am skilled at doing this activity " ) was made. The first two were recoded in reverse so that high scores reflect a more positive appraisal of the activity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Novel study designs using within-subject methodology and frequent and prospective measurements are required to unravel direction of causality and dynamic processes of behavior over time. The current study examined the effects of physical activity on affective state. A primary and within-study replication sample was derived from twin pairs. Female twins (n = 504) participated in an experience sampling method study at baseline. Positive and negative affective changes were examined before and following daily life increases in physical activity. Neuroticism was measured at baseline and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline and at each of four follow-up assessments. Diagnoses, derived by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Health-IV axis I disorders, (A. P. A., 1994) were obtained at baseline. A significant increase in positive affect (PA) following the moment of increase in physical activity was replicated across both samples up to 180 min after physical activity. There was no effect of physical activity on negative affect (NA). Across the two samples, a history of fulfilling diagnostic criteria for depression at least once moderated the effect of physical activity on PA, in that the effect was lost more rapidly. The study supports a causal effect of physical activity on PA. However, people with past experience of clinical depression may benefit less from the PA-inducing effect of physical activity. These findings have implications for the use of physical exercise in clinical practice.
    Health Psychology 03/2012; 31(2):135-44. DOI:10.1037/a0025688 · 3.95 Impact Factor
Show more