The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 06/2008; 358(21):2249-58. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The prevalence of smoking has decreased substantially in the United States over the past 30 years. We examined the extent of the person-to-person spread of smoking behavior and the extent to which groups of widely connected people quit together.
We studied a densely interconnected social network of 12,067 people assessed repeatedly from 1971 to 2003 as part of the Framingham Heart Study. We used network analytic methods and longitudinal statistical models.
Discernible clusters of smokers and nonsmokers were present in the network, and the clusters extended to three degrees of separation. Despite the decrease in smoking in the overall population, the size of the clusters of smokers remained the same across time, suggesting that whole groups of people were quitting in concert. Smokers were also progressively found in the periphery of the social network. Smoking cessation by a spouse decreased a person's chances of smoking by 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59 to 73). Smoking cessation by a sibling decreased the chances by 25% (95% CI, 14 to 35). Smoking cessation by a friend decreased the chances by 36% (95% CI, 12 to 55 ). Among persons working in small firms, smoking cessation by a coworker decreased the chances by 34% (95% CI, 5 to 56). Friends with more education influenced one another more than those with less education. These effects were not seen among neighbors in the immediate geographic area.
Network phenomena appear to be relevant to smoking cessation. Smoking behavior spreads through close and distant social ties, groups of interconnected people stop smoking in concert, and smokers are increasingly marginalized socially. These findings have implications for clinical and public health interventions to reduce and prevent smoking.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigate adolescent risk behaviour regarding substance use in stepfamilies as compared to single-and two-parent families, using data from the " Health Behaviour in School-aged Children " study (HBSC), a World Health Organization (WHO) cross-national and cross-sectional survey administered to adolescents aged 11, 13, and 15 years. Given the possible long-term consequences of early risk behaviour for adolescents' physical, mental, and social well-being over the life course, our goal is to identify differences in the prevalence of risk taking behaviour between these family types and to identify social resilience factors that moderate these differences. Such a detailed empirical analysis is possible because information on the extra-household family structure has been recorded in the HBSC study but also because pooling the data of 37 countries provides us with a very large dataset to distinguish even rare (step-)family constellations. Following our analysis, we first provide descriptive results on the prevalence of substance abuse in stepfamilies, single-and two-parent families across countries. Second, we present the results of a set of logistic regression models on substance use in adolescence, taking into account the unobserved within-country heterogeneity by conducting unconditional fixed effects models. Our results show that, after controlling for a range of relevant child and family characteristics and the relationship to parents and friends, adolescence in all family forms with complex constellations, including parent-child ties across households, show a higher level of substance use than adolescence in a two-biological-parent family. Children in single-biological-mother or single-biological-father households and without a second household, however, do not differ in their substance use from children who live with both of their biological parents.
    New Family Forms Following Family Dissolution: Consequences in/on Postmodern Society, Leuven, Belgium; 09/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tobacco use within India has significant effects on the global burden of tobacco-related disease. As role models and opinion leaders, teachers are at the forefront of tobacco control efforts, yet little is known about their own tobacco use. This study examines the association between factors in the social environment and tobacco use among teachers in Bihar, India. The study was based on the Bihar School Teachers' Study baseline survey. Seventy-two Bihar government schools (grades 8-10) were randomly selected for the study and all school personnel were invited to complete the survey in June/July in 2009 and 2010. We assessed the relation between social contextual factors and current smoking/smokeless tobacco use by fitting a series of logistic regression models. After controlling for clustering of teachers in schools and other covariates, our results showed teachers with one or more coworkers who used tobacco were twice as likely to be smokeless tobacco users as teachers with no co-workers who used tobacco. Teachers who reported rules prohibiting smoking at home were significantly less likely to smoke than teachers without such rules. Older male teachers also had significantly greater odds of smoking/using smokeless tobacco. These findings provide direction for future interventions targeting the social context. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Preventive Medicine 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.021 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Homophily and social influence are the main explanations for why there are more ties among people who have similar socio-demographic or behavioral characteristics. Homophily refers to the phenomenon that people are more likely to make relational ties with others who are similar to themselves than those who are not, whereas social influence refers to the phenomenon that an individual’s behavior is likely to become more similar to that of her friends over time. It is important to study both homophily and social influence processes of a social network because each process can lead to different structural characteristics for a social network; homophily can lead to separation among the members of a network, whereas social influence can lead to network-wide uniformity. In this study, we examine homophily and social influence processes among online casual game players. Specifically, we ask whether an online casual game player tends to be friends with other online casual game players who have similar game genre preferences and whether a player’s genre preferences and gaming frequencies become more similar to those of her Kongregate friends over time. For this study, demographic attributes, game genre preferences, gaming frequencies, and relational ties for 2488 game players were collected for two time periods from Kongregate. The panel data were analyzed with RSiena, the R version of SIENA (Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analysis), a social network analysis program used for social network panel data. The results suggest that there might not be strong homophily and social influence processes operating among the game players in the sampled network.
    Telematics and Informatics 03/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.007 · 0.71 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014