Preliminary Study of the Use of Drug-eluting Stents in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenoses 4 mm in Diameter or Smaller
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Alfred 6460, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
(Impact Factor: 2.41).
06/2008; 19(6):833-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.017
To describe restenosis and clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents (DESs) and compare them to those of bare metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) in the same patients.
A retrospective study was performed of all patients with RAS treated with a DES (Taxus Express 2 or Cypher). DESs were used for RASs with luminal vessel diameters of 4 mm or smaller and BMSs were used for those larger than 4 mm.
Sixteen patients (eight women; mean age, 72 years +/- 8) underwent treatment of 27 RASs for worsening renal function (n = 10) and uncontrolled hypertension (n = 6). Eighteen RASs were treated with 23 DESs (Cypher, n = 12; Taxus, n = 11) and nine were treated with BMSs. The average follow-up was 22 months +/- 10. After the procedure, the mean systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (P < .05), with no change in the mean diastolic pressure, serum creatinine, or number of antihypertensive medications. By Kaplan-Meier estimates, the 1- and 2-year patency rates for DESs were 78% and 68%, respectively; and for BMSs, the respective rates were 58% and 47% (P = NS). The average diameters of RASs were 3.4 mm +/- 0.6 in the DES group and 5.3 mm +/- 0.6 in the BMS group (P < .05). There were two technical failures (7.7%) in the DES group. There was one minor complication and a non-flow-limiting dissection.
DESs were used to treat RASs with good technical results and low restenosis rates compared with BMSs despite the smaller artery diameters in the DES group.
Available from: Curtis Lewis
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 10/2003; 14(9 Pt 2):S297-310. DOI:10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61947-2 · 2.41 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Renal artery stent placement to treat renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients undergoing hemodialysis is not performed commonly. We present our outcomes of discontinuation of hemodialysis after treating patients with RAS by stent placement on acute (< or =30 days of hemodialysis) and chronic hemodialysis (>30 days).
A retrospective study was conducted in 16 patients (nine men) with an average age of 74.6 years +/- 10.6 (range, 49-86 y) who underwent treatment of 22 RAS for acute renal failure (n = 8) or uncontrolled hypertension with chronic hemodialysis (n = 8). The average follow-up was 448 days +/- 450 (median, 363.5 d; range, 6-1,583 d). The primary outcome consisted of discontinuation of hemodialysis, death, and transplantation. Secondary endpoints included restenosis, changes in blood pressure (and use of medications), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
After the stent procedure, eight patients were able to discontinue hemodialysis and remained free from dialysis over a mean period of 564 days +/- 533. The predictors of discontinuation of hemodialysis were 24-hour proteinuria, eGFR before renal artery stent placement, and size of the kidney on ultrasound studies (P < .05 for all three). There was no difference in patients who were undergoing acute versus chronic hemodialysis. There were three minor complications, and one patient died 6 days after the procedure because of multiple cardiovascular problems.
Renal artery stent placement for the treatment of RAS in patients receiving hemodialysis can result in discontinuation of hemodialysis in patients with low proteinuria level and adequate kidney size and eGFR.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 11/2008; 19(11):1563-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.016 · 2.41 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to report safety, efficacy, and renal function outcomes with use of the GuardWire embolic protection device (EPD) in renal artery stent placement for patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) and chronic renal insufficiency (CRI).
This was a retrospective study of all patients with RAS and CRI treated concomitantly with a GuardWire EPD and renal artery stents from December 2002 through June 2006. Renal function was determined by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, and subjects were divided into Kidney Disease Outcomes and Quality Initiative (K-DOQI) classes based on baseline eGFR. After revascularization, an improvement from baseline of at least one K-DOQI class was defined as improvement, unchanged K-DOQI class as stabilization, and worsening of at least one K-DOQI class as deterioration.
There were 63 patients (54% men) with a mean age of 75.2 years +/- 7.7. The mean baseline serum creatinine level and eGFR were 1.87 mg/dL +/- 0.6 (range, 1-3.8 mg/dL) and 36.63 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 11.42 (range, 13.85-59.99 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)), respectively, and at the last clinical follow-up, the respective measurements were 1.96 mg/dL +/- 0.72 and 38.75 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) +/- 13.25 (P = not significant). Over a mean follow-up period of 16 months +/- 12, 14 patients (25%) showed improvement, 33 (58%) had stable renal function, and 10 (18%) showed deterioration. There was one GuardWire-related dissection, which was successfully treated with a stent.
The GuardWire EPD, used during renal artery stent placement, is safe and was associated with stabilization or improvement in kidney function in 83% of patients with RAS and CRI.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 04/2009; 20(5):580-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.025 · 2.41 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.