4D time-resolved MR angiography with keyhole (4D-TRAK): more than 60 times accelerated MRA using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T.

Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Impact Factor: 2.79). 06/2008; 27(6):1455-60. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21354
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To present a new 4D method that is designed to provide high spatial resolution MR angiograms at subsecond temporal resolution by combining different techniques of view sharing with parallel imaging at 3.0T.
In the keyhole-based method, a central elliptical cylinder in k-space is repeated n times (keyhole) with a random acquisition (CENTRA), and followed by the readout of the periphery of k-space. 4D-MR angiography with CENTRA keyhole (4D-TRAK) was combined with parallel imaging (SENSE) and partial Fourier imaging. In total, a speed-up factor of 66.5 (6.25 [CENTRA keyhole] x 8 [SENSE] x 1.33 [partial Fourier imaging]) was achieved yielding a temporal resolution of 608 ms and a spatial resolution of (1.1 x 1.4 x 1.1) mm(3) with whole-brain coverage 4D-TRAK was applied to five patients and compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
4D-TRAK was successfully completed with an acceleration factor of 66.5 in all five patients. Sharp images were acquired without any artifacts possibly created by the transition of the central cylinder and the reference dataset. MRA findings were concordant with DSA.
4D time-resolved MRA with keyhole (4D-TRAK) is feasible using a combination of CENTRA, keyhole, and SENSE at 3.0T and allows for more than 60 times accelerated MRA with high spatial resolution.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The combination of high spatial and high temporal resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0 T has enabled the detailed evaluation of functional vascular anatomy and hemodynamics of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Key contributory technical factors for the successful implementation of MRA in patients with different vascular pathologies are multicoil and multichannel receiver arrays, which enable higher parallel acquisition at 3.0 T over a uniform and a large field of view for highly temporally and spatially resolved MRA. Magnetic resonance angiography enables both screening of patients with suspected AVMs and follow-up of patients after therapy. It allows the characterization of AVMs with respect to nidus configuration, size, venous drainage, and so on, according to the Spetzler-Martin classification.
    Topics in magnetic resonance imaging: TMRI 11/2008; 19(5):251-7. DOI:10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181a98d5f
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Magnetic resonance provides a wide variety of possibilities for arterial and venous blood vessel imaging in all vascular territories. This article provides a brief review of the technical principles of MR angiography. The first section is dedicated to non-contrast-enhanced angiography techniques and includes several distinct approaches: time-of-flight, phase contrast, triggered angiography non-contrast-enhanced, and balanced steady-state free precession. The second section relates to the contrast-enhanced and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography methods. The latest technical developments in MR imaging hardware, sequences and software, coil technology, and reconstruction capability allow dynamic MR angiography performance similar to CT angiography, without risks of iodine contrast agent and ionizing radiation exposure.
    Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 03/2009; 17(1):1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.mric.2009.01.012 · 0.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary advantage of high field strength MR imaging over imaging on modern 1.5 Tesla (T) systems is increased signal-to-noise ratio, which can be used to improve image quality or shorten scan acquisition time. In the years since 3.0T scanners were first approved for clinical use, one of the areas which has benefited greatly from its introduction is neurovascular MR angiography (MRA). Early experience has shown significant improvements in resolution and image quality. Whether high field strength MRA is robust or accurate enough to replace digital subtraction angiography in the foreseeable future remains to be seen. This article discusses the current state of neurovascular MRA at 3.0T, basic physical differences between MR imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T, and their effects on MRA sequences. The literature regarding the efficacy of 3.0T MRA techniques for diagnosing specific neurovascular pathologies and carotid steno occlusive disease is reviewed.
    Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America 03/2009; 17(1):29-46. DOI:10.1016/j.mric.2008.12.005 · 0.80 Impact Factor
Show more