Article

Incontinence pads: recommending the best product-based wetback performance and price

Division of Urogynecology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63117, USA.
International Urogynecology Journal (Impact Factor: 2.16). 05/2008; 19(10):1411-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0645-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Incontinence pads are available in the USA without a prescription and are commonly the first treatment option a patient with incontinence uses. The goal of this study was to examine the difference in the performance and cost of commercially available incontinence pads with the intention of providing recommendations to women. Ten different urinary incontinence products were selected. A modified wetback test was used to test product performance. For the small volume leaks, the Walgreen's Extra pad generally performed worse on the wetback test than the three other pads tested (p = 0.001-0.012), but four tests were not statistically significant. At larger leak volumes, the Walgreen's underwear generally performed worse than other products (p < or = 0.001-0.046), with some exceptions. Brand name products generally performed better than generic products, but cost more. Undergarments and underwear do the worst job of keeping moisture inside the pad.

0 Followers
 · 
102 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society / WOCN 36(3):238-40. DOI:10.1097/WON.0b013e3181a39357 · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a common problem in elderly incontinent people. A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted to examine and compare properties of intact skin on the buttocks and subumbilicus area in elderly people wearing absorbent products and to identify pad environment factors that affect skin properties. Study participants included 45 elderly (age range: 68 to 103 years) female residents of one nursing home who were incontinent of feces and urine (dual incontinence group--DIG, n = 35) or feces only (fecal incontinence group--FIG, n= 10). Skin pH and hydration were measured and factors believed to affect the perineal environment and contribute to the development of IAD were assessed. In both DIG and FIG, skin hydration levels and pH were higher in the coccygeal than in the subumbilical area. Skin hydration of the sacral region in the DIG was significantly higher than in the FIG (P = 0.019) and skin pH on the coccygeal region and sacral region in the DIG was significantly higher than in the FIG (coccygeal region, P = 0.013; sacral region, P = 0.023). Absorbent pad surface pH (P &0.01) and excessive sweating (P = 0.006) were significantly related to skin pH. Results show that properties of perineal skin in elderly women with incontinence are affected by occlusion with pads, increasing the risk of IAD. Studies comparing the effect of various types of pads and pad-change frequencies on skin properties are needed.
    Ostomy/wound management 12/2010; 56(12):26-8, 30-3. · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of comparing the performance of different absorbent aids in terms of odour control by discussing a suitable methodology for product evaluation. To overcome the problems of low test reproducibility owing to biological urine variability, the first step of the work consisted of the identification and the production of artificial urine having a constant and stable composition over time, moreover preventing sensorial assessors from any risk of biological contamination. Sensorial measurements were performed to optimize the similarity between artificial and biological urine, especially as far as the composition of the volatile component and therefore of the odour properties are concerned. The assessment of absorbent articles performance to control urine malodour includes both the concentration and the hedonic tone of the odour released by the article itself loaded with synthetic urine. Analyses were run on different products, which can be grouped into two different classes: absorbing aids with or without odour control technology (OCT) respectively. Results show that, despite of the presence or absence of OCT on absorbing products, their odour concentrations are almost identical, being comprised between 10 000 and 12 000 ouE m−3. For this reason, it is evident that odour concentration is not suitable as the sole parameter for comparison of different absorbing products. Instead, the hedonic odour tone (odour pleasantness/unpleasantness) relevant to the different product typologies (that is products with and without OCT) should be used as an additional discriminating factor for this kind of comparative tests. Le but de cette étude est d'étudier la possibilité de comparer la performance des différentes aides absorbants en termes de contrôle des odeurs, en décrivant une méthodologie appropriée pour l'évaluation des produits. Afin de surmonter les problèmes de la faible reproductibilité du test en raison de la variabilité biologique des urines, la première étape du travail a consisté en l'identification et la production d'urine artificielle, ayant une composition constante et stable dans le temps, et par ailleurs permettant à prévenir les évaluateurs sensoriels de tout risque de contamination biologique. Des mesures sensorielles ont été réalisées afin d'optimiser la similitude entre l'urine artificielle et biologique, en particulier en ce qui concerne la composition du composant volatil et donc des propriétés odorantes. L'évaluation de la performance des articles absorbant pour contrôler les mauvaises odeurs d'urine comprend à la fois la concentration et la tonalité hédonique de l'odeur dégagée par l'article lui-même chargé d'urine synthétique. Les analyses ont été effectuées sur des produits différents, qui peuvent être regroupés en deux catégories différentes: des absorbants avec ou sans la technologie de contrôle des odeurs (OCT), respectivement. Les résultats montrent qu'en dépit de la présence ou de l'absence de la OCT sur les produits absorbants, les concentrations d'odeurs sont presque identiques, étant comprises entre 10 000 et 12 000 ouE m−3. Pour cette raison, il est évident que la concentration d'odeur ne convient pas comme seul paramètre pour comparer des différents produits absorbants. Au lieu de cela, le ton hédonique des odeurs (odeur agréable/desagréable?) pertinents aux différentes typologies de produits (i.e. produits 'avec et sans OCT) devrait être utilisé comme un facteur supplémentaire de discrimination pour ce genre de tests comparatifs.
    International journal of cosmetic science 12/2012; 35(4). DOI:10.1111/ics.12028 · 1.45 Impact Factor
Show more