Post-acute care for older people in community hospitals—a cost-effectiveness analysis within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Health Research and Information Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Age and Ageing (Impact Factor: 3.64). 06/2008; 37(5):513-20. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn120
Source: PubMed


to compare the cost effectiveness of post-acute care for older people provided in community hospitals with general hospital care.
cost-effectiveness study embedded within a randomised controlled trial.
seven community hospitals and five general hospitals at five centres in the midlands and north of England. Participants: 490 patients needing rehabilitation following hospital admission with an acute illness. Intervention: multidisciplinary team care for older people in community hospitals.
EuroQol EQ-5D scores transformed into quality-adjusted life years; health and social service costs during the 6-month period following randomisation.
there was a non-significant difference between the community hospital and general hospital groups for changes in quality-adjusted life-year values from baseline to 6 months (mean difference 0.048; 95% confidence interval -0.028 to 0.123; P = 0.214). Resource use was similar for both groups. The mean (standard deviation) costs per patient for health and social services resources used were comparable for both groups: community hospital group 8,946 pounds ( 6,514 pounds); general hospital group 8,226 pounds ( 7,453 pounds). These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimate was 16,324 pounds per quality-adjusted life year. A cost effectiveness acceptability curve suggests that if decision makers' willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year was 10,000 pounds, then community hospital care was effective in 47% of cases, and this increased to only 50% if the threshold willingness to pay was raised to 30,000 pounds.
the cost effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation for older people was similar in community hospitals and general hospitals.

4 Reads
  • Source
    • "Another study of community hospitals shows significantly greater functional independence at six months for patients allocated to one of seven community hospitals [17]. In a complementary cost-effectiveness study, O’Reilly et al. found that the health outcomes and costs between the two services were similar [26]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different care models have been established to achieve more coordinated clinical pathways for older patients in the transition between hospital and home. This study explores an intermediate unit's role in a clinical pathway for older patients with somatic diseases. Qualitative data were collected via interviews, observations, and a questionnaire. Participants included patients and healthcare providers within both specialist and primary healthcare. Transcripts of interviews and field notes were analyzed using a method of systematic text condensation. Healthcare providers in the hospital, the intermediate unit, and the municipalities have different opinions about who is a 'suitable' patient for the unit and what is the proper time for hospital discharge. This results in time-consuming negotiations between the hospital and the unit. Incompatible computer systems increase the healthcare provider's workload. Several informants are doubtful as to whether a stay in the unit is useful to the patients, while the patients are mostly pleased with their stay and the transferral. This study describes challenges that may occur when a new unit is established in an existing healthcare system in order to achieve an appropriate clinical pathway from hospital to home.
    International journal of integrated care 03/2013; 13:e012. · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • Value in Health 11/2006; 9(6). DOI:10.1016/S1098-3015(10)63707-2 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more