An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology - Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Impact Factor: 1.06). 06/2008; 66(11):1745-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being used in regulatory assessments. However, to date there has been no attempt to compare the outputs of the different models used. This paper presents the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency's EMRAS Biota Working Group which compares the predictions of a number of such models in model-model and model-data inter-comparisons.


Available from: J. Horyna, Mar 17, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of the absorbed dose in biota as a radioecology tool is a recent option in international radioprotection recommendations. Absorbed dose is proposed to guide the management of decisions about environmental security in exposure to ionizing radiation. In this work, a model of estimation of the absorbed dose was applied to freshwater fish from natural radiation enhanced areas (NORM) and technologically enhanced natural radiation areas (TENORM). A radioecological relevance index (RRI), based on the absorbed dose is proposed to northern the choice of the critical radionuclide. Two species of fish were analyzed as bioindicators: Tilapia nilotica (Linnaeus, 1758), tilapia, and Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824), cará. Tilapia was used as a bioindicator in URA (Uranium Concentrate Unit, a uranium mine in activity) and USQ (Santa Quitéria unit, a phosphate mine, with associated uranium) and the cará fish in UTM (Ore Treatment Unit, a uranium mine in decommissioning phase). The analyzed radionuclides were: 238U, 232Th, 226Ra, 228Ra and 210Pb. 238U was the only relevant radionuclide for cará at UTM, being considered the critical radionuclide. The same conclusion was achieved for tilapia at USQ. For tilapia at URA 238U and 226Ra were of medium relevance, being considered the only critical radionuclides.
    IV Congresso de Proteção Contra Radiações da Comunidade de Países de Língua Portuguesa, Gramado, Brasil; 08/2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Concentration ratios (CRwo-media) are used in most radioecological models to predict whole-body radionuclide activity concentrations in wildlife from those in environmental media. This simplistic approach amalgamates the various factors influencing transfer within a single generic value and, as a result, comparisons of model predictions with site-specific measurements can vary by orders of magnitude. To improve model predictions, the development of 'condition-specific' CRwo-media values has been proposed (e.g. for a specific habitat). However, the underlying datasets for most CRwo-media value databases, such as the wildlife transfer database (WTD) developed within the IAEA EMRAS II programme, include summarised data. This presents challenges for the calculation and subsequent statistical evaluation of condition-specific CRwo-media values. A further complication is the common use of arithmetic summary statistics to summarise data in source references, even though CRwo-media values generally tend towards a lognormal distribution and should, therefore, be summarised using geometric statistics. In this paper, we propose a statistically-defensible and robust method for reconstructing underlying datasets to calculate condition-specific CRwo-media values from summarised data and deriving geometric summary statistics. This method is applied to terrestrial datasets from the WTD. Statistically significant differences in sub-category CRwo-media values (e.g. mammals categorised by feeding strategy) were identified, which may justify the use of these CRwo-media values for specific assessment contexts. However, biases and limitations within the underlying datasets of the WTD explain some of these differences. Given the uncertainty in the summarised CRwo-media values, we suggest that the CRwo-media approach to estimating transfer is used with caution above screening-level assessments.
    Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 09/2013; 126. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.022 · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An environmental risk assessment (ERA) was performed to evaluate the impact on non-human biota from liquid and atmospheric radioactive discharges by the Belgian Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) of Doel and Tihange. For both sites, characterisation of the source term and wildlife population around the NPPs was provided, whereupon the selection of reference organisms and the general approach taken for the environmental risk assessment was established. A deterministic risk assessment for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems was performed using the ERICA assessment tool and applying the ERICA screening value of 10 μGy h(-1). The study was performed for the radioactive discharge limits and for the actual releases (maxima and averages over the period 1999-2008 or 2000-2009). It is concluded that the current discharge limits for the Belgian NPPs considered do not result in significant risks to the aquatic and terrestrial environment and that the actual discharges, which are a fraction of the release limits, are unlikely to harm the environment.
    Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 08/2013; 126C:61-76. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.004 · 3.57 Impact Factor