Article

An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota.

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology - Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Impact Factor: 1.18). 06/2008; 66(11):1745-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being used in regulatory assessments. However, to date there has been no attempt to compare the outputs of the different models used. This paper presents the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency's EMRAS Biota Working Group which compares the predictions of a number of such models in model-model and model-data inter-comparisons.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
151 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiation dose-risk assessment was carried out for cereal species Brassica compestris var. dichotoma, Oryza sativa var. Shalum1, Zea mays, Lactuca indica, Cumunis sativum, and Clocasia esculanta due to naturally available radionuclides 40K, 238U and 232Th in Domiasiat area. The activity in biota and corresponding soil was measured by precipitation method using NaI(TI) detector. Transfer factor (TF) was for Oryza spp. (1.00E−01-40K, 8.76E−05-232Th, and 9.11E−05-238U), for Brassica spp. (5.39E−01-40K, 8.17E−04-232Th and 2.96E−04-238U) and for Zea spp. (3.41E−01-40K, 5.84E−05-232Th, 8.87E−05-238U) etc., respectively. A detailed physio-morphological study of the biota and extensive investigation of ecosystem was carried out for assessment. The data was modeled using FASSET for dose estimation and obtained total dose was 1.58E−04 \upmu Gyh-1 \upmu \hbox{Gy}\,h^{-1} in Oryza spp., 2.87E−04 \upmu Gyh-1 \upmu \hbox{Gy}\,h^{-1} Brassica spp. and 6.90E−03 \upmu Gyh-1 \upmu \hbox{Gy}\,h^{-1} in Zea spp. etc. The dose was compared with the UNSCEAR dataset for screening level dose for biota. Zea spp. was more susceptible for the chronic radiation exposure. KeywordsDomiasiat–Dose–Cereal species– Zea spp.
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 290(3):525-533. · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Environmental assessments to evaluate potentials risks to humans and wildlife often involve modelling to predict contaminant exposure through key pathways. Such models require input of parameter values, including concentration ratios, to estimate contaminant concentrations in biota based on measurements or estimates of concentrations in environmental media, such as water. Due to the diversity of species and the range in physicochemical conditions in natural ecosystems, concentration ratios can vary by orders of magnitude, even within similar species. Therefore, to improve model input parameter values for application in aquatic systems, freshwater concentration ratios were collated or calculated from national grey literature, Russian language publications, and refereed papers. Collated data were then input into an international database that is being established by the International Atomic Energy Agency. The freshwater database enables entry of information for all radionuclides listed in ICRP (1983), in addition to the corresponding stable elements, and comprises a total of more than 16,500 concentration ratio (CR(wo-water)) values. Although data were available for all broad wildlife groups (with the exception of birds), data were sparse for many organism types. For example, zooplankton, crustaceans, insects and insect larvae, amphibians, and mammals, for which there were CR(wo-water) values for less than eight elements. Coverage was most comprehensive for fish, vascular plants, and molluscs. To our knowledge, the freshwater database that has now been established represents the most comprehensive set of CR(wo-water) values for freshwater species currently available for use in radiological environmental assessments.
    Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 10/2012; · 3.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An environmental risk assessment (ERA) was performed to evaluate the impact on non-human biota from liquid and atmospheric radioactive discharges by the Belgian Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) of Doel and Tihange. For both sites, characterisation of the source term and wildlife population around the NPPs was provided, whereupon the selection of reference organisms and the general approach taken for the environmental risk assessment was established. A deterministic risk assessment for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems was performed using the ERICA assessment tool and applying the ERICA screening value of 10 μGy h(-1). The study was performed for the radioactive discharge limits and for the actual releases (maxima and averages over the period 1999-2008 or 2000-2009). It is concluded that the current discharge limits for the Belgian NPPs considered do not result in significant risks to the aquatic and terrestrial environment and that the actual discharges, which are a fraction of the release limits, are unlikely to harm the environment.
    Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 08/2013; 126C:61-76. · 3.67 Impact Factor