The association of television viewing with snacking behavior and body weight of young adults

Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
American journal of health promotion: AJHP (Impact Factor: 2.37). 05/2008; 22(5):329-35. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.22.5.329
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Investigate whether TV viewing and recognition of snack food advertisements were associated with snack food consumption and the odds of being overweight or obese.
Cross-sectional internet-based survey.
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Undergraduate university students aged 18 to 25 years (N = 613).
Self-reported TV viewing, energy-dense snack consumption, snacking while viewing TV, and body weight.
Hypothesis testing was completed using multiple analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and logistic regression.
Students reporting medium or high TV viewership snacked more frequently while watching TV and recognized more advertising than students who were considered low viewers. High viewers also reported more consumption of energy-dense snacks than low viewers. Snacking frequency appeared to be related to TV viewing and place of residence, but the association between snacking frequency and TV viewing was not accounted for by advertising. Conversely, the association between TV viewing and consumption of energy-dense snacks was accounted for by advertising recognition. Finally, male students (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-4.59) and medium (OR, 3.11; 99% CI, 1.37-7.08) and high (OR, 5.47; 99% CI, 1.97-15.16) TVviewers had higher odds of being overweight or obese.
Associations were found among TV viewing, energy-dense snack consumption, and snacking behavior, and between TV viewing and body weight status.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Limited research has been conducted to investigate factors associated with overweight and obesity of children in China, where obesity has been increasing. This study investigated associations of lifestyle factors with overweight or obesity among Chinese primary school-aged children.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with 2400 children aged 6¿12 from 11 primary schools. Children completed a self-administered questionnaire assisted by their parents at home. The survey included questions on self-reported height and weight, screen time, physical activity, modes of travel to/from school, and dietary habits. Multilevel models were conducted to examine factors associated with overweight or obesity.Results15.2% of children were overweight and 10.9% were obese; nearly 80% of children spent ¿2 hrs./day either on physical activities or screen time. Compared with those spent >3 hrs./day on screen time, children who spent ¿2 hrs./day or between 2-3 hrs./day were significantly less likely to be obese after adjusting for other variables (AOR¿=¿0.34, 95%CI: 0.20-0.60, P¿<¿0.01; or AOR¿=¿0.41, 95%CI: 0.20-0.84, P¿=¿0.02 respectively). Children spent ¿2 hrs./day on screen time were less likely to become overweight or obesity, compared with >3 hrs./day (AOR¿=¿0.62, 95%CI: 0.38-0.99, P¿<¿0.05).Conclusions Screen time is independently associated with childhood obesity, and needs be focused for obesity prevention in school-aged children in China.
    BMC Research Notes 01/2015; 8(1):6. DOI:10.1186/s13104-014-0958-y
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The cognitive processes responsible for effortful behavioural regulation are known as the executive functions, and are implicated in several factors associated with behaviour control, including focussing on tasks, resisting temptations, planning future actions, and inhibiting prepotent responses. Similar to muscles, the executive functions become fatigued following intensive use (e.g. stressful situations, when tired or busy, and when regulating behaviour such as quitting smoking). Therefore, an individual may be more susceptible to engaging in unhealthy behaviours when their executive functions are depleted. In the present study we investigate associations between the executive functions, snack food consumption, and sedentary behaviour in real time. We hypothesise that individuals may be more susceptible to unhealthy snacking and sedentary behaviours during periods when their executive functions are depleted. We test this hypothesis using real-time objective within-person measurements. Methods/Design A sample of approximately 50 Scottish adults from varied socio-economic, working, and cultural backgrounds will participate in the three phases of the SNAcking, Physical activity, Self-regulation, and Heart rate Over Time (SNAPSHOT) study. Phase one will require participants to complete home-based questionnaires concerned with diet, eating behaviour, and physical activity (≈1.5 hours to complete). Phase two will constitute a 2-3 hour psychological laboratory testing session during which trait-level executive function, general intelligence, and diet and physical activity intentions, past behaviour, and automaticity will be measured. The final phase will involve a 7-day ambulatory protocol during which objective repeated assessments of executive function, snacking behaviour, physical activity, mood, heart rate, perceived energy level, current context and location will be measured during participants’ daily routines. Multi-level regression analysis, accounting for observations nested within participants, will be used to investigate associations between fluctuations in the executive functions and health behaviours. Discussion Data from the SNAPSHOT study will provide ecologically valid information to help better understand the temporal associations between self-regulatory resources (executive functions) and deleterious health behaviours such as snacking and sedentary behaviour. If we can identify particular periods of the day or locations where self-regulatory resources become depleted and produce suboptimal health behaviour, then interventions can be designed and targeted accordingly.
    BMC Public Health 09/2014; 14(1):1006. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1006 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Canadian Journal of Diabetes 01/2011; 35(2):195. DOI:10.1016/S1499-2671(11)52208-7 · 0.46 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014