Psychomotor performance deficits and their relation to prior nights' sleep among individuals with primary insomnia

VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Sleep (Impact Factor: 5.06). 06/2008; 31(5):599-607.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine psychomotor (reaction time) performance deficits and their relation to subjective and objective sleep measures among individuals with primary insomnia (PI).
This study was conducted at affiliated VA and academic medical centers using a matched-groups, cross-sectional research design.
Seventy-nine (43 women) individuals with PI (MAge = 50.0 +/- 17.1 y) and 84 (41 women) well-screened normal sleepers (MAge = 48.6 +/- 16.8 y).
Participants underwent 3 nights of polysomnography (PSG) followed by daytime testing with a 4-trial multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Before each MSLT nap, they rated their sleepiness and completed a performance battery that included simple reaction time (SRT), continuous performance (CPT), and 4 switching attention (SAT) tests. Performance measures included the mean response latency and the standard deviation of each subject's within-test response latencies.
PI sufferers reported greater (P = 0.001) daytime sleepiness, but were significantly (P = 0.02), more alert than normal sleepers on the MSLT. Multivariate analyses showed the PI group had significantly longer response latencies and greater response variability across many of the subtests than did the controls. Regression analyses showed that both PSG- and diary-based sleep measures contributed to the prediction of daytime performance indices, although objective wake time after sleep onset appeared the best single predictor of the daytime measures.
Results confirm that PI sufferers do show relative psychomotor performance deficits when responding to challenging reaction time tasks, and these deficits appear related to both objective and subjective sleep deficits. Findings support PI patients' diurnal complaints and suggest the usefulness of complex reaction time tasks for assessing them.

Download full-text


Available from: Colleen E Carney, Mar 13, 2014
  • Source
    • "These disorders have been shown to affect daily functions as well (Kindermann and Brown 1997; Kizilbash et al. 2002; Wingen et al. 2006) and may have influenced the results. The absence of objective impairment in experimental studies is mainly explained by a lack of laboratory tests demanding high effort (Vignola et al. 2000; Altena et al. 2008; Edinger et al. 2008). Most performance tasks are of short duration and insomniacs may relatively easy be able to maintain high-level performance during testing (Varkevisser and Kerkhof 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many older adults report sleep problems and use of hypnotics. Several studies have shown that hypnotics can have acute adverse effects on driving the next morning. It is unclear however whether driving of chronic hypnotic users is impaired. Therapeutic effects on insomnia and development of tolerance may reduce the residual effects on driving. The present study aimed to compare actual driving performance and driving-related skills of chronic hypnotic users to good sleepers. To determine whether insomnia itself affects driving performance, driving and driving-related skills were compared between insomnia patients who do not or infrequently use hypnotics and good sleepers. Twenty-two frequent users of hypnotics (using hypnotics ≥4 nights per week for more than 3 months), 20 infrequent users (using hypnotics ≤3 nights per week), and 21 healthy, age-matched controls participated in this study. On the night before testing, all subjects were hospitalized for an 8-h sleep recorded by polysomnography. Frequent hypnotic users used their regular medication at bedtime (2330 hours), while infrequent users and controls received no medication. Cognitive performance (word learning, digit span, tracking, divided attention, vigilance, and inhibitory control) was assessed 8.5 h and driving performance between 10 and 11 h after bedtime and dosing. Polysomnographic recordings did not significantly differ between the groups, but the insomnia patients, treated or untreated, still reported subjective sleep complaints. Results show no differences in driving performance and driving-related skills between both groups of insomnia patients and controls. Driving performance in chronic users of hypnotics and untreated insomnia patients is not impaired. For chronic users, this may be due to prescription of relatively safe drugs and low doses. For untreated insomniacs, this corroborates previous findings showing an absence of neuropsychological deficits in this group of patients.
    Psychopharmacology 02/2014; 231(14). DOI:10.1007/s00213-014-3455-z · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It is well known that sleep is closely related to cognitive function, for example, it has been reported that poor sleep quality is associated with decrements in performance in tests of cognition, especially executive function1, 5, 6). In addition, some studies have reported that task performances, such as, arousal, reaction time, arithmetic operation, short-term or long-term memory, and logic/reasoning decrease when people are deprived of sleep5,6,7,8). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: [Purpose] This study examined whether the alpha rhythm sleep alters the EEG activity and response time in the attention and concentration tasks. [Subjects and Methods] The participants were 30 healthy university students, who were randomly and equally divided into two groups, the experimental and control groups. They were treated using the Happy-sleep device or a sham device, respectively. All participants had a one-week training period. Before and after training sessions, a behavioral task test was performed and EEG alpha waves were measured to confirm the effectiveness of training on cognitive function. [Results] In terms of the behavioral task test, reaction time (RT) variations in the experimental group were significantly larger than in the control group for the attention item. Changes in the EEG alpha power in the experimental group were also significantly larger than those of the control group. [Conclusions] These findings suggest that sleep induced using the Happy-sleep device modestly enhances the ability to pay attention and focus during academic learning.
    Journal of Physical Therapy Science 12/2013; 25(12):1515-8. DOI:10.1589/jpts.25.1515 · 0.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It was well known that HVs are significantly smaller in patients with major depression than in normal controls.35 In the present study, PIs reported more depressive symptoms than GSs (BDI scores: 13.8 vs. 3.5, p=0.04). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Differences in hippocampal volume (HV) were compared between chronic primary insomniacs (PIs) and good sleepers (GSs), and the relationship between HV and memory function in PIs was investigated to clarify the effect of chronic sleep deprivation on brain structure and cognition. Twenty PIs (mean age, 50 years; 18 females) and 20 age-, gender-, and education-matched GSs were enrolled. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. Left and right HV and intracranial volume (ICV) were measured manually. Nighttime polysomnography and neuropsychological testing were also applied to all subjects. Group differences in HV were analyzed and the relationships between HV and sleep questionnaire data, nighttime polysomnography, and neuropsychological findings were evaluated. Compared to GSs, PIs exhibited significantly increased sleep latency and arousal index and a decreased percentage of REM sleep in nighttime polysomnography, as well as impaired verbal and visual memory, and frontal lobe function. Absolute HV and ICV did not differ significantly between PIs and GSs. In the PIs, right and left HVs were negatively correlated with the duration of insomnia and the arousal index, and positively correlated with the recognition of visual memory. In addition, free recall in verbal memory was positively correlated with left HV in PIs. These findings suggest that chronic sleep deprivation impairs memory and frontal lobe function, and that a long duration of insomnia and poor sleep quality contribute to a bilateral reduction in HV.
    Journal of Clinical Neurology 06/2012; 8(2):130-8. DOI:10.3988/jcn.2012.8.2.130 · 1.81 Impact Factor
Show more