Article

The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia

Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia.
Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 6.17). 07/2008; 115(10):1655-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To establish the absolute risk of contact lens (CL)-related microbial keratitis, the incidence of vision loss and risk factors for disease.
A prospective, 12-month, population-based surveillance study.
New cases of CL-related microbial keratitis presenting in Australia over a 12-month period were identified through surveillance of all ophthalmic practitioners (numerator). Case detection was augmented by records' audits at major ophthalmic centers. The denominator (number of wearers of different CL types in the community) was established using a national telephone survey of 35,914 individuals.
Cases and controls were interviewed by telephone to determine subject demographics and CL wear history. Visual outcomes were determined 6 months after the initial event. Annualized incidence and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for different severities of disease and multivariable analysis was used in risk factor analysis.
Annualized incidence (with CI) of disease and vision loss by CL type and wear modality and identification of independent risk factors.
We identified 285 eligible cases of CL-related microbial keratitis and 1798 controls. In daily wear rigid gas-permeable CL wearers, the annualized incidence per 10,000 wearers was 1.2 (CI, 1.1-1.5); in daily wear soft CL wearers 1.9 (CI, 1.8-2.0); soft CL wearers (occasional overnight use) 2.2 (CI, 2.0-2.5); daily disposable CL wearers 2.0 (CI, 1.7-2.4); daily disposable CL wearers (occasional overnight use) 4.2 (CI, 3.1-6.6); daily wear silicone hydrogel CL wearers 11.9 (CI, 10.0-14.6); silicone hydrogel CL wearers (occasional overnight use) 5.5 (CI, 4.5-7.2); overnight wear soft CL wearers 19.5 (CI, 14.6-29.5) and in overnight wear of silicone hydrogel 25.4 (CI, 21.2-31.5). Loss of vision occurred in 0.6 per 10,000 wearers. Risk factors included overnight use, poor storage case hygiene, smoking, Internet purchase of CLs, <6 months wear experience, and higher socioeconomic class.
Incidence estimates for soft CL use were similar to those previously reported. New lens types have not reduced the incidence of disease. Overnight use of any CL is associated with a higher risk than daily use.

2 Followers
 · 
184 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the rates of microbial contamination and identify contaminants associated with contact lens (CL) care accessories. To investigate self-reported compliance levels with care of CL accessories and its association with contamination level. A total of 46 CL cases and care solutions from asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers were collected. Samples from the CL cases and care solutions were cultured for microbiological identification and enumeration. A questionnaire regarding compliance to care and hygiene procedures were administered to each subject on their visit. The percentage of microbial contamination for CL cases and care solutions was 50% and 10.9%, respectively. All the contaminants were bacterial. Staphylococcus aureus (37.0%, 17 of 46 cases) and Escherichia coli (8.7%, 4 of 46 cases) were the most common microorganisms detected in CL cases. In care solutions, S. aureus (8.7%, 4 of 46 samples), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2.2%, 1 of 46 samples) were common contaminants. CL cases and care solutions that were used for <3 months were significantly less contaminated than those used for >3 months (10.9% versus 39.1%, p<0.05). Polyquad and Aldox based MPS solution showed no contamination. Subjects with medium or low compliance had highly significant rates of contaminations both in CL cases and solutions than for subjects with high compliance (p<0.05). Nepalese Soft CL wearers are at high risk of developing ocular complications due to high CL case and solution contamination. Frequent replacement of CL cases and solutions, as well as good compliance is recommended to reduce risk of contamination.
    Contact lens & anterior eye: the journal of the British Contact Lens Association 07/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2013.07.001 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate compliance with daily disposable contact lens (DDCL) wear and investigate re-use of lenses according to country and DDCL material worn. Optometrists invited eligible DDCL patients from their practices to participate in a survey on DDCL wear in Australia, Norway, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). Eligible participants completed an online or paper version of the survey. 805 participants completed the survey (96% online): Australia 13%, Norway 32%, UK 17%, US 38%. The median age was 38 years; 66% were female. Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) DDCLs were worn by 14%. Overall, 9% were non-compliant with DDCL replacement; Australia 18%, US 12%, UK 7% and Norway 4%. There were no differences with respect to sex, years of contact lens wear experience or DDCL material (SiHy versus hydrogels). The primary reason for re-use was "to save money" (60%). Re-use of DDCLs resulted in inferior comfort at insertion and prior to lens removal (p=0.001). 75% reported occasional napping and 28% reported sleeping overnight for at least one night in the preceding month, while wearing their DDCLs. Non-compliance with replacement of DDCLs occurred in all countries investigated; the rate was highest in Australia and lowest in Norway. Re-use of DDCLs was associated with reduced comfort. DDCL wearers often reported wearing lenses overnight. It is important for optometrists to counsel their patients on the importance of appropriate lens wear and replacement for DDCLs.
    Contact lens & anterior eye: the journal of the British Contact Lens Association 07/2013; 36(6). DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2013.05.004 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose to do this research was to find out the habits of contact lens wearers towards lens care in this country, and to evaluate the compliance of contact lens wearers. All respondents underwent an interview regarding questionnaire which was carried out at the Klang Valley and Sabah, Malaysia by trained bilingual optometrists. The questionnaire was obtained from a study by Yvonne Wu et al., 2010. The questionnaire included information about respondents' demographics, contact lens hygiene behaviors and attitudes toward lens care. Comparison between groups and certain factors of lens care were analyzed. Within the 100 respondents, 74% were female. The majority used monthly disposable lens (53%, 53/100), 35% (35/100) wore daily lens, 3% (3/100) wore biweekly disposable lens, 8% (8/100) wore quarter-yearly (3 months) lens, and only a participant (1%) used conventional lenses. The major non-compliance aspect that found out from this research were poor lens case (46%), inadequate cleaning of lens before storing (38%) and wearers not remembering how often they were advised to return for an aftercare (24%). The poor lens care hygiene, inadequate cleaning of lens before storing may due to lack of proper advice to the contact lens wearers during examination or lack of awareness of aftercare visit.
    The Medical journal of Malaysia 06/2012; 67(3):274-7.