Bias and asymmetric loss in expert forecasts: A study of physician prognostic behavior with respect to patient survival

Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, CGIS 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.
Journal of Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.25). 08/2008; 27(4):1095-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We study the behavioral processes undergirding physician forecasts, evaluating accuracy and systematic biases in estimates of patient survival and characterizing physicians' loss functions when it comes to prediction. Similar to other forecasting experts, physicians face different costs depending on whether their best forecasts prove to be an overestimate or an underestimate of the true probabilities of an event. We provide the first empirical characterization of physicians loss functions. We find that even the physicians subjective belief distributions over outcomes are not well calibrated, with the loss characterized by asymmetry in favor of over-predicting patients' survival. We show that the physicians' bias is further increased by (1) reduction of the belief distributions to point forecasts, (2) communication of the forecast to the patient, and (3) physicians own past experience and reputation.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reptile medicine is a broad field with a relatively incomplete data set to work from in the relevant literature. Despite the popularity of pet reptiles, few veterinary schools provide significant education in reptile medicine. The lack of professional veterinary medical education presents challenges to the clinician seeking to provide the best care for their reptile patients. R eptiles are increasingly popular pets. In Brit-ain, the number of pet reptiles has been re-ported to exceed the number of pet dogs. 1 The field of reptile medicine presents unique chal-lenges to the clinician due, in large part, to the diversity of species that commonly present as pets. There are significant differences in reptile physiol-ogy from the common domestic mammals, and own-ers frequently lack basic knowledge of appropriate care for these animals. There is a paucity of well-supported information on the topic of reptile med-icine and an abundance of misinformation. A recent survey found that only 4 North American Veterinary colleges provided more than 6 hours of lecture on reptile medicine, despite 4% of households in the United States owning reptiles. 2 Given these limita-tions, it is essential for the reptile clinician to be able to identify and evaluate information on a topic and to make the best decisions possible based on incom-plete data.
    Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 07/2009; 18(3):194-201. DOI:10.1053/j.jepm.2009.06.014 · 0.40 Impact Factor
  • American Journal of Roentgenology 06/2009; 192(5):1375-81. DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.2063 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 01/2013; 110(7). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1222674110 · 9.81 Impact Factor


1 Download
Available from