Article

What is "mirror" in the premotor cortex? A review.

Institut Jean-Nicod, UMR 8129, EHESS, CNRS, département d'études cognitives, Ecole normale supérieure, 29 rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology (Impact Factor: 1.46). 07/2008; 38(3):189-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.02.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We review the findings of 24 fMRI studies examining activations in the premotor cortex (Brodmann's areas 6 and 44) during passive observation of actions. We found that such activations regularly occurred. Looking for functional differentiation in the premotor cortex, we found that one parameter was associated with systematic differences in location: this was the presence or absence of targets. Observing biological actions with a physical target, compared to a visual control showing no action at all, consistently activated the ventral premotor cortex (BA 6), and did so significantly more than observing target-less actions (with the same control). In contrast, the activity in BA 44 ("Broca's area") was not modulated by the presence or absence of targets. We propose that the ventral precentral gyrus, and not BA 44, shares the visual properties of "mirror" neurons found in area F5 of the macaque brain.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
116 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reappraisal, the cognitive reevaluation of a potentially emotionally arousing event, has been proposed to be based upon top-down appraisal systems within the prefrontal cortex (PFC). It still remains unclear, however, how different prefrontal regions interact to control and regulate emotional responses. We used fMRI and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to characterize the functional interrelationships among dorsal and ventral PFC regions involved in reappraisal. Specifically, we examined the effective connectivity between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), and other reappraisal-related regions (supplementary motor area, supramarginal gyrus) during the up- and downregulation of emotions in response to highly arousing extreme sports film clips. We found DLPFC to be the central node of the prefrontal emotion regulation network, strongly interconnected with the IFG. The DCM analysis further revealed excitatory changes of connection strength from the DLPFC to the IFG and strong inhibitory changes of connection strength between the IFG and DLPFC during reappraisal. These bidirectional changes in connectivity strength indicate a feedback mechanism by which the IFG may select one out of several possible goal-appropriate reappraisals held active in working memory (represented in the DLPFC) and inhibits the DLPFC once the selection process is completed.
    Cerebral Cortex 01/2015; DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhv005 · 8.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reading is a complex higher-order cognitive activity unique to human beings, which transmits the sense, feeling, tone, and intention of the writer and brings pleasures. However, the neurocognitive aspects of emotion processing in literary reading are still hardly understood. This dissertation aims to investigate the affective processing mechanisms during literary reading. The neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading by Jacobs (2011, 2014) is referred to as guidance for the author to pose relevant research questions and to test key assumptions of the model. The foci of this dissertation include the lexical, inter-lexical level, and supra-lexical level. For this dissertation, an fMRI experiments were conducted, in which 120 text passages from the Harry Potter book series were presented. The passages presented contained three orthogonal factorial dimensions: Emotion, Supra-naturalness, and Language (L1 vs. L2). Chapter 2 investigates the emotion potential of single words in reading. Results showed significant correlations between affective lexical variables, passage ratings, as well as activity in regions associated with emotion, situation model building, multi-modal semantic integration, and Theory of Mind, suggesting that the emotion potential of texts can be predicted by lexical and inter-lexical affective variables. Chapter 3 investigates the neural correlates of the immersion reading experience. Immersion ratings were significantly higher for fear-inducing than for neutral passages, and activity in the mid-cingulate cortex correlated more strongly with immersion ratings of fear-inducing than neutral pas-sages. The results suggest that negatively valenced contents activate the affective empathy network and facilitate the immersive reading experience. Chapter 4 investigates the effect of world-knowledge violation during situation model construction. Readers assigned passages in the supra-natural condition significantly higher scores on dimensions of supra-naturalness, surprise, and reading pleasure. Neural correlates of reading supra-natural vs. neutral contents include neural correlates associated with world-knowledge integration, the salience network, emotion processing, and attention. Finally, the author investigated whether there is any quantitative or qualitative difference in emotion processing when reading in L1 vs. L2 at the neuronal level. At the behavioral and factorial fMRI results showed stronger perceived emotionality in L1 than in L2. Furthermore, MVPA results reading literature in L1 seems to provide a more differentiated emotional experience. Results of the present thesis supported the emotion potential of word recognition, fiction feelings, and the world knowledge violation in the neurocognitive poetics model. Furthermore, the salience, extended language, and ToM networks are extensively involved in the emotion processing in literary reading. Future studies on emotion processing in literary reading will benefit from this dissertation to develop more specific neuroscientific hypotheses on the causal relationships and interactions between different neural networks with more sophisticated methods, potentially applying such approaches to cross-linguistic/cultural studies.
    01/2015, Degree: Dr. phil. in Psychology, Supervisor: Arthur Jacobs
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mirror neurons, originally described in the monkey premotor area F5, are embedded in a frontoparietal network for action execution and observation. A similar Mirror Neuron System (MNS) exists in humans, including precentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and superior temporal sulcus. Controversial is the inclusion of Broca's area, as homologous to F5, a relevant issue in light of the mirror hypothesis of language evolution, which postulates a key role of Broca's area in action/speech perception/production. We assess “mirror” properties of this area by combining neuroimaging and intraoperative neurophysiological techniques. Our results show that Broca's area is minimally involved in action observation and has no motor output on hand or phonoarticulatory muscles, challenging its inclusion in the MNS. The presence of these functions in premotor BA6 makes this area the likely homologue of F5 suggesting that the MNS may be involved in the representation of articulatory rather than semantic components of speech. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 10/2014; 36(3). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22682 · 6.92 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
99 Downloads
Available from
Jul 30, 2014

View other sources