Article

Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy.

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.5). 07/2008; 87(6):1750-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although both maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) may affect birth weight, their separate and joint associations with complications of pregnancy and delivery and with postpartum weight retention are unclear.
We aimed to investigate the combined associations of prepregnancy BMI and GWG with pregnancy outcomes and to evaluate the trade-offs between mother and infant for different weight gains.
Data for 60892 term pregnancies in the Danish National Birth Cohort were linked to birth and hospital discharge registers. Self-reported total GWG was categorized as low (<10 kg), medium (10-15 kg), high (16-19 kg), or very high (>or=20 kg). Adjusted associations of prepregnancy BMI and GWG with outcomes of interest were estimated by logistic regression analyses.
High and very high GWG added to the associations of high prepregnancy BMI with cesarean delivery and were strongly associated with high postpartum weight retention. Moreover, greater weight gains and high maternal BMI decreased the risk of growth restriction and increased the risk of the infant's being born large-for-gestational-age or with a low Apgar score. Generally, low GWG was advantageous for the mother, but it increased the risk of having a small baby, particularly for underweight women.
Heavier women may benefit from avoiding high and very high GWG, which brings only a slight increase in the risk of growth restriction for the infant. High weight gain in underweight women does not appear to have deleterious consequences for them or their infants, but they may want to avoid low GWG to prevent having a small baby.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
202 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and weight change in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy likely have an effect on pregnancy outcome. However, limited clinical evidence is available to support the correlation. To investigate the relationship of pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational BMI gains and their effect on pregnancy outcome among Chinese women with GDM. Data were collected from 1418 pregnant patients with GDM who received antenatal care and performed delivery in our hospital. Patients were categorized into groups based on pre-pregnancy and gestational BMI in order to evaluate the risk of pregnancy complications. After being diagnosed with GDM during pregnancy, every subject received advice on lifestyle modification and learned how to self-monitor glucose and administer insulin if needed. LBW is likely to occur in underweight women with low pre-pregnancy BMI (ORs 2.96, P < 0.01). Obese women are more vulnerable to hypertension, macrosomia and preterm labor (ORs are 5.92, 2.92, 1.79 respectively; P < 0.05). Similar result is observed in overweight women (ORs are 2.72, 1.64, 1.45 respectively; P < 0.05). The prevalence of LBW was higher in gestational BMI gain of < 4 team and the teams of BMI gain > 6 were vulnerable to macrosomia. An appropriate maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (18.5-24) followed by adequate gestational BMI gain (4~6) could reduce the risk of the maternal and infant complications.
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 01/2014; 7(12):5784-9. · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. To determine a precise estimate for the contribution of maternal obesity to macrosomia. Data Sources. The search strategy included database searches in 2011 of PubMed, Medline (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid Medline, 1950-2011), and EMBASE Classic + EMBASE. Appropriate search terms were used for each database. Reference lists of retrieved articles and review articles were cross-referenced. Methods of Study Selection. All studies that examined the relationship between maternal obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) (pregravid or at 1st prenatal visit) and fetal macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g, ≥4500 g, or ≥90th percentile) were considered for inclusion. Tabulation, Integration, and Results. Data regarding the outcomes of interest and study quality were independently extracted by two reviewers. Results from the meta-analysis showed that maternal obesity is associated with fetal overgrowth, defined as birth weight ≥ 4000 g (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.92, 2.45), birth weight ≥4500 g (OR 2.77,95% CI 2.22, 3.45), and birth weight ≥90% ile for gestational age (OR 2.42, 95% CI 2.16, 2.72). Conclusion. Maternal obesity appears to play a significant role in the development of fetal overgrowth. There is a critical need for effective personal and public health initiatives designed to decrease prepregnancy weight and optimize gestational weight gain.
    BioMed Research International 01/2014; 2014:640291. DOI:10.1155/2014/640291 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Low or high prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and inadequate or excess gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. This study estimates the contribution of these risk factors to preterm births (PTBs), small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) births in Canada compared to the contribution of prenatal smoking, a recognized perinatal risk factor.Methods We analyzed data from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. A sample of 5,930 women who had a singleton live birth in 2005-2006 was weighted to a nationally representative population of 71,200 women. From adjusted odds ratios, we calculated population attributable fractions to estimate the contribution of BMI, GWG and prenatal smoking to PTB, SGA and LGA infants overall and across four obstetric groups.ResultsOverall, 6% of women were underweight (<18.5 kg/m2) and 34.4% were overweight or obese (¿25.0 kg/m2). More than half (59.4%) gained above the recommended weight for their BMI, 18.6% gained less than the recommended weight and 10.4% smoked prenatally. Excess GWG contributed more to adverse outcomes than BMI, contributing to 18.2% of PTB and 15.9% of LGA. Although the distribution of BMI and GWG was similar across obstetric groups, their impact was greater among primigravid women and multigravid women without a previous PTB or pregnancy loss. The contributions of BMI and GWG to PTB and SGA exceeded that of prenatal smoking.Conclusions Maternal weight, and GWG in particular, contributes significantly to the occurrence of adverse neonatal outcomes in Canada. Indeed, this contribution exceeds that of prenatal smoking for PTB and SGA, highlighting its public health importance.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 02/2015; 15(1):21. DOI:10.1186/s12884-015-0452-0 · 2.15 Impact Factor

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
156 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014