Caregiver burden and health in bipolar disorder: a cluster analytic approach.

Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10019, USA.
The Journal of nervous and mental disease (Impact Factor: 1.81). 06/2008; 196(6):484-91. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181773927
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify caregivers at risk for adverse health effects associated with caregiving, the stress, coping, health and service use of 500 primary caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. K-means cluster analysis and ANOVA identified and characterized groups with differing baseline stress/coping profiles. Mixed effects models examined the effects of cluster, time, and covariates on health outcomes. Three groups were identified. Burdened caregivers had higher burden and avoidance coping levels, and lower mastery and social support than effective and stigmatized caregivers; stigmatized caregivers reported the highest perceived stigma (p < 0.05). Effective and stigmatized groups had better health outcomes and less service use than the burdened group over time; stigmatized caregivers had poorer self-care than effective caregivers. Cluster analysis is a promising method for identifying subgroups of caregivers with different stress and coping profiles associated with different health-related outcomes.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly important in health care and mental health research. Furthermore, caregivers become partners in care for patients with mental disorders, and health workers are more attentive to the expectations and needs of caregivers. A number of outcomes for caregivers are measured and used in daily practice in order to promote actions to improve health care systems and progress in research on the impact of mental disorders on their caregivers. This paper proposes an inventory of the different outcomes and different measurement tools used to assess the impact of disorders, raising a number of methodological and conceptual issues that limit the relevance of measurement tools and complicate their use. Finally, we propose some recommendations promoting the development of relevant outcome measures for caregivers and their integration into current systems of care.
    Dialogues in clinical neuroscience 06/2014; 16(2):159-69.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PurposeThis study examined relationships between vulnerability/risk and protective factors, and family functioning in women family members of adults with serious mental illness. Design and Methods Using a descriptive, correlational design, this secondary analysis examined characteristics of the family member with mental illness (e.g., diagnosis, level of care) and measures of caregiver stigma and strain, client dependence, family disruption, sense of coherence, and resourcefulness. FindingsFamily disruption was greatest in women who provided direct care and whose family member had major depression, followed by bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and panic disorder. Sense of coherence and resourcefulness were associated with lower family disruption, but did not mediate the effects of caregiver strain. Practice ImplicationsInterventions restricted to one family member may be insufficient for improving the family functioning.
    Perspectives In Psychiatric Care 12/2013; 50(4). DOI:10.1111/ppc.12047 · 0.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To distinguish the impact of mental illness stigma from that of other negative caregiving experiences, this study examined the unique relationships between stigma and caregiver/family functioning. Adult relatives (n = 437) of individuals with mental illness completed questionnaires regarding caregiving experiences, distress, empowerment, and family functioning, as part of a larger study. Regression analyses examined the relationship between stigma and caregiver/family variables, while controlling for other negative caregiving experiences. Stigma was uniquely associated with caregiver distress, empowerment, and family functioning. Mental illness stigma is a potent source of distress for families and an important target of family services.
    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 08/2014; DOI:10.1007/s11414-014-9437-4 · 1.03 Impact Factor


Available from
Nov 20, 2014