Rationing of nursing care and its relationship to patient outcomes: the Swiss extension of the International Hospital Outcomes Study.

Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care (Impact Factor: 1.58). 08/2008; 20(4):227-37. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To explore the association between implicit rationing of nursing care and selected patient outcomes in Swiss hospitals, adjusting for major organizational variables, including the quality of the nurse practice environment and the level of nurse staffing. Rationing was measured using the newly developed Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care (BERNCA) instrument. Additional data were collected using an adapted version of the International Hospital Outcomes Study questionnaire.
Multi-hospital cross-sectional surveys of patients and nurses.
Eight Swiss acute care hospitals
Nurses (1338) and patients (779) on 118 medical, surgical and gynecological units.
Patient satisfaction, nurse-reported medication errors, patient falls, nosocomial infections, pressure ulcers and critical incidents involving patients over the previous year.
Generally, nurses reported rarely having omitted any of the 20 nursing tasks listed in the BERNCA over their last 7 working days. However, despite relatively low levels, implicit rationing of nursing care was a significant predictor of all six patient outcomes studied. Although the adequacy of nursing resources was a significant predictor for most of the patient outcomes in unadjusted models, it was not an independent predictor in the adjusted models. Low nursing resource adequacy ratings were a significant predictor for five of the six patient outcomes in the unadjusted models, but not in the adjusted ones.
As a system factor in acute general hospitals, implicit rationing of nursing care is an important new predictor of patient outcomes and merits further study.


Available from: Douglas M Sloane, Jun 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To describe care worker–reported quality of care and to examine its relationship with staffing variables, work environment, work stressors, and implicit rationing of nursing care. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: National, randomly selected sample of Swiss nursing homes, stratified according to language region and size. Participants: A total of 4311 care workers of all educational backgrounds (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, nurse aides) from 402 units in 155 nursing homes completed a survey between May 2012 and April 2013. Measurements: Care worker–reported quality of care was measured with a single item; predictors were assessed with established instruments (eg, Practice Environment Scale–Nurse Working Index) adapted for nursing home use. A multilevel logistic regression model was applied to assess predictors for quality of care. Results: Overall, 7% of care workers rated the quality of care provided as rather low or very low. Important factors related to better quality of care were higher teamwork and safety climate (odds ratio [OR] 6.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.36–8.79); better staffing and resources adequacy (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.08–4.15); less stress due to workload (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55–0.93); less implicit rationing of caring, rehabilitation, and monitoring (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.24–0.49); and less rationing of social care (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.92). Neither leadership nor staffing levels, staff mix, or turnover was significantly related to quality of care. Conclusions: Work environment factors and organizational processes are vital to provide high quality of care. The improvement of work environment, support in handling work stressors, and reduction of rationing of nursing care might be intervention points to promote high quality of care in nursing homes.
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 05/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.04.012 · 4.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Nurses are an ideal source to report on the quality of care and the uses of their perspective is a valid index in assessment of the quality of nursing care. The aim of this study was to explore the quality of nursing care from the perspective of nurses in critical cardiac units. Method: This was a qualitative study in which purposive sampling was used with maximum variation and 23 participants were interviewed with open-ended questions in Semnan during 2012-2013. The main method of data collection was semi-structured interviews. The interviews were digitally recorded, immediately transcribed word by word, and analyzed using content analysis method. Results: By data analysis of extracted contexts, the main theme abstracted was "the need for effective nursing management". Subthemes include "adequate and efficient human resources", "human relationships", "organized nursing performance", and "appropriate environment and suitable tools, equipment, and facilities". Conclusion: The results of this study explored employed nurses' experiences on quality of nursing care in critical cardiac care units. Having effective nursing management for providing resources and human relationships are essential to maintaining and improving the quality of nursing care in critical cardiac units.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives:To evaluate the occurrence of patient adverse events in Korean hospitals as perceived by nurses and examine the correlation between patient adverse events with the nurse practice environment at nurse and hospital level.Methods:In total, 3096 nurses working in 60 general inpatient hospital units were included. A two-level logistic regression analysis was performed.Results:At the hospital level, patient adverse events included patient falls (60.5%), nosocomial infections (51.7%), pressure sores (42.6%) and medication errors (33.3%). Among the hospital-level explanatory variables associated with the nursing practice environment, ‘physician- nurse relationship’ correlated with medication errors while ‘education for improving quality of care’ affected patient falls.Conclusions:The doctor-nurse relationship and access to education that can improve the quality of care at the hospital level may help decrease the occurrence of patient adverse events.
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 09/2014; 47(5):273-80. DOI:10.3961/jpmph.14.019