Individual responsibility and solidarity in European health care: further down the road to two-tier system of health care.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Ethics in Science & Medicine Department of Psychiatry 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA.
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (Impact Factor: 0.79). 07/2008; 33(3):191-7. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhn012
Source: PubMed
1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The roles of measurement activities in manufacturing enterprises of the assume fragmentary forms of operation such as inspection by measurement after completion, control of accuracy of measuring instruments used for inspection, development of measuring methods or instruments intended for new evaluation, etc., are discussed. The Total Measurement Action Program (TMAP), which was built up for the purpose of systematizing the measurement control and the measuring techniques in manufacturing enterprises so as to pursue and realize the total effects of measurement activities, is implemented in groups of our company and is promoted in the following 5 steps: 1. Instrument control and precision control. 2. Correct method and correct operation. 3. Matching and standardization to measurement purposes. 4. Measurement and instrumentation improvement. 5. Measurement and instrumentation development. This paper is intended to report the promotion method and the results of these activities
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : State-level policymakers play an important role in the fight against obesity because of their ability to create policies that influence opportunities for physical activity and nutrition. : In 2011, we investigated how Kansas policymakers regarded obesity, nutrition, and physical activity in comparison to other issues. : This study used a cross-sectional design. : This study was conducted in Kansas, a predominately rural and Republican Midwestern state. : All 181 state-level policymakers in Kansas were mailed a cover letter and survey. : Policymakers were asked to identify and rate the importance of issues or problems in need of attention for Kansas. The 2011 state legislative report was content analyzed and coded to match the survey. Comparisons were made by political party. : Of the 49 policymakers who completed a survey, 37 were Republicans and 43 were elected to their position. Although obesity-related issues were rated second highest after jobs, physical activity- and nutrition-related issues were not seen as important problems; moreover, little corresponding legislation was introduced. Other key issues identified by policymakers included budget/spending/taxes, education, jobs/economy, and drug abuse, with more legislation reflecting these problems. The Democrats ranked 11 issues as more significant problems than did the Republicans: quality of public education, poverty, access to health care, lack of affordable housing, ethics in government, lack of public health training, access to healthy groceries, lack of pedestrian walkways/crosswalks/sidewalks, pedestrian safety, air pollution, and global warming (P < .05). : There is a need to provide more public health education on the relationship between nutrition and physical activity issues and obesity for Kansas policymakers. Issues identified may be similar for other predominately rural and Republican states.
    Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP 03/2013; 19(2):139-45. · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interest has grown worldwide in risk adjustment and risk sharing due to their potential to contain costs, improve fairness, and reduce selection problems in health care markets. Significant steps have been made in the empirical development of risk adjustment models, and in the theoretical foundations of risk adjustment and risk sharing. This literature has often modeled the effects of risk adjustment without highlighting the institutional setting, regulations, and diverse selection problems that risk adjustment is intended to fix. Perhaps because of this, the existing literature and their recommendations for optimal risk adjustment or optimal payment systems are sometimes confusing. In this paper, we present a unified way of thinking about the organizational structure of health care systems, which enables us to focus on two key dimensions of markets that have received less attention: what choices are available that may lead to selection problems, and what financial or regulatory tools other than risk adjustment are used to influence these choices. We specifically examine the health care systems, choices, and problems in four countries: the US, Canada, Chile, and Colombia, and examine the relationship between selection-related efficiency and fairness problems and the choices that are allowed in each country, and discuss recent regulatory reforms that affect choices and selection problems. In this sample, countries and insurance programs with more choices have more selection problems.
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11/2013; 10(11):5299-5332. · 1.99 Impact Factor