Article

Monitoring direct FXa-inhibitors and fondaparinux by Prothrombinase-induced Clotting Time (PiCT): relation to FXa-activity and influence of assay modifications.

Pharmazentrum Frankfurt, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thrombosis Research (Impact Factor: 3.13). 07/2008; 123(2):396-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.05.010
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT FXa-activity can be measured by the Prothrombinase induced Clotting time (PiCT). The manufactured assay uses bovine FXa as component and employs a incubation period before re-calcification. Its use with new direct FXa-inhibitors is challenged by reports on decreased sensitivity.
Blood was incubated with 3 investigational, structurally related (oxazolidinones) direct FXa-inhibitors including the recently approved agent rivaroxaban (0 - 2.0 microM), with the structurally distinct direct FXa-inhibitor DX 9065a (0 - 18 microM) and with the indirect inhibitor fondaparinux (0 - 0.6 microM). We tested modifications of PiCT regarding the source of FXa (bovine or human) and the incubation step (incubation before re-calcification=2-step, no incubation =1-step), and compared results with inhibition of human or bovine FXa-activity.
The bovine 2-step PiCT showed a paradoxical decrease with all direct FXa-inhibitors, this effect is surmounted only at high concentrations and is not seen with the bovine 1-step PiCT. The decrease in PiCT is not observed in antithrombin-depleted plasma. The humanized PiCT (1 or 2 step) showed a consistent prolongation under all direct inhibitors. Fondaparinux prolonged PiCT with either assay. The correlation between PiCT and corresponding FXa-activity was significant both for humanized 2-step PiCT or bovine 1 step PiCT (r2=0.80), but the 95% prediction interval was large and covered a span of 40% FXa-activity between one agent and another.
The customary bovine PiCT should only be used to monitor direct FXa-inhibitors when modified as 1-step procedure. PiCT is not suitable to assess similarity of FXa-inhibition when different agents are interchanged.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
62 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research into new anticoagulants for preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders has focused on targeting single enzymes in the coagulation cascade, particularly Factor Xa and thrombin, inhibition of which greatly decreases thrombin generation. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in many countries for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. Owing to its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, fixed-dose regimens are used without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In situations where assessment of rivaroxaban exposure may be helpful, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays (in tandem with standard calibration curves generated with the use of rivaroxaban calibrators and controls) could be used. It is important to note that test results will be affected by the timing of blood sampling after rivaroxaban intake. In addition, the anti-Factor Xa method measures the drug concentration and not the intensity of the drug's anticoagulant activity, and a higher than expected rivaroxaban plasma level does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, clinicians need to consider test results in relation to the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and other patient risk factors associated with bleeding.
    Thrombosis Journal 07/2013; 11(1):11. · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rivaroxaban is the first agent available within a new class of anticoagulants called direct factor Xa inhibitors. Rivaroxaban is approved for use in the United States for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip replacement and total knee replacement, for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and for the reduction in risk of recurrence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (with additional indications under review). Rivaroxaban dose and frequency of administration vary depending on the indication. As of result of predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a fixed dose of rivaroxaban is administered without routine coagulation testing. Rivaroxaban has a short half-life, undergoes a dual mode of elimination (hepatic and renal), and is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. Rivaroxaban has a lower potential for drug interactions compared with warfarin. Despite the advantages of a once/day fixed-dose oral agent, in many clinical situations limited evidence is available to guide optimal management of rivaroxaban therapy. In this article, we review the available evidence and provide recommendations where possible for such situations including the desire to monitor the anticoagulation intensity, use in special patient populations, managing drug interactions, and transitioning across anticoagulant agents. Potential strategies for reversing rivaroxaban's anticoagulant effect are reviewed. Health systems will need to perform a systematic safety evaluation and ensure that numerous hospital policies related to anticoagulation are updated to include rivaroxaban. A comprehensive approach to education is needed for clinicians, patients, and technical support personnel involved in patient interactions to ensure safe use.
    Pharmacotherapy 05/2013; · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management, venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality. For decades, antithrombotic therapy for prevention and treatment of VTE was limited to parenteral agents related to heparin and oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Both classes of anticoagulants are effective, but have limitations, including considerable variability in dose-response, narrow therapeutic margins between the risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and the need to monitor anticoagulation intensity. Over the past decade, the introduction of new oral anticoagulants that specifically inhibit coagulation factors IIa (thrombin) or Xa has changed practice in a variety of clinical situations, including VTE prophylaxis and treatment. In this Review, we outline the use of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the prevention and treatment of VTE, and discuss practical considerations for choosing the appropriate drug for each patient. Although the introduction of novel anticoagulant drugs is promising, selecting the optimum strategy for an individual patient requires an understanding of the specific circumstances associated with thrombus formation and the pharmacological properties of each agent.
    Nature Reviews Cardiology 05/2013; · 10.40 Impact Factor