Arsenic removal from contaminated soil using phosphoric acid and phosphate

College of Resources and Environment, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.
Journal of Environmental Sciences (Impact Factor: 2). 02/2008; 20(1):75-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60011-X
Source: PubMed


Laboratory batch experiments were conducted to study arsenic (As) removal from a naturally contaminated soil using phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4). Both H3PO4 and KH2PO4 proved to reduce toxicity of the soil in terms of soil As content, attaining more than 20% As removal at a concentration of 200 mmol/L. At the same time, acidification of soil and dissolution of soil components (Ca, Mg, and Si) resulted from using these two extractants, especially H3PO4. The effectiveness of these two extractants could be attributed to the replacement of As by phosphate ions (PO4(3-)). The function of H3PO4 as an acid to dissolve soil components had little effects on As removal. KH2PO4 almost removed as much As as H3PO4, but it did not result in serious damage to soils, indicating that it was a more promising extractant. The results of a kinetic study showed that As removal reached equilibrium after incubation for 360 min, but dissolution of soil components, especially Mg and Ca, was very rapid. Therefore dissolution of soil components would be inevitable if As was further removed. Elovich model best described the kinetic data of As removal among the four models used in the kinetic study.

25 Reads
  • Source
    • "Al to check for any structural damage of soil following Zeng et al. (2008) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An environment friendly arsenic removal technique from contaminated soil with high iron content has been studied. A natural surfactant extracted from soapnut fruit, phosphate solution and their mixture was used separately as extractants. The mixture was most effective in desorbing arsenic, attaining above 70 % efficiency in the pH range of 4–5. Desorption kinetics followed Elovich model. Micellar solubilization by soapnut and arsenic exchange mechanism by phosphate are the probable mechanisms behind arsenic desorption. Sequential extraction reveals that the mixed soapnut–phosphate system is effective in desorbing arsenic associated with amphoteric–Fe-oxide forms. No chemical change to the wash solutions was observed by Fourier transform-infrared spectra. Soil:solution ratio, surfactant and phosphate concentrations were found to affect the arsenic desorption process. Addition of phosphate boosted the performance of soapnut solution considerably. Response surface methodology approach predicted up to 80 % desorption of arsenic from soil when treated with a mixture of ≈1.5 % soapnut, ≈100 mM phosphate at a soil:solution ratio of 1:30.
    International journal of Environmental Science and Technology 12/2013; 12(2). DOI:10.1007/s13762-013-0441-7 · 2.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Maximum allowed concentrations of arsenic in agricultural soils vary according to the country. For example, values up to 30 mg As kg − 1 are acceptable in China (Zeng et al., 2008), while in most western countries 20 mg As kg − 1 is the maximum allowed (Kissel et al., 2003 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mining is a source of trace element contamination of neighbouring soils. This study determined the influence of soil amendments (iron oxides, Fe; organic matter, OM; and calcium phosphate, PCa) on arsenic uptake and translocation by tomato and parsley growth in an As-contaminated soil. The original contaminated soil without amendments was collected in the vicinity of the abandoned Santo António mine (Penedono, Portugal), which was a very important gold and arsenic mining centre in the middle fifties of the last century. An uncontaminated soil was also used as control. Growth parameters measured were plant height, length of 4th leaf (tomato only) and dry matter accumulation. Arsenic concentration in plant components was also determined, and human health risks related to the edible tissues were calculated. Results showed that arsenic availability in the soil varied with the amendments applied: OM and PCa increased arsenic availability, while the opposite effect was found with Fe (at 3 g kg− 1). Soil amended with iron oxides showed no positive effect on plant growth compared with the original soil with no amendments. Amongst all the amendments, OM led to the best results relatively to all growth parameters measured in tomato, including dry matter accumulation and fruit yield. Parsley growth was very small except in the PCa at 12 g kg− 1. Parsley translocated more arsenic to shoots, while tomato retained a greater proportion in roots. The health risk for adults and adolescents was within acceptable limits with an average weekly intake of 500 g of tomato and 20 g of parsley, although the arsenic concentration in edible tissues was still considerable greater than in plants grown in the uncontaminated control soil.
    Journal of Geochemical Exploration 12/2012; 123:114–121. DOI:10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.04.004 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Arsenic is one of the worst cancer-causing chemicals distributed widely in the environment from both natural and anthropogenic sources (Moon et al., 2004; Wang and Duan, 2009). In soil it can a pose risk to human health either by ingestion via the food chain or through secondary pollution of air and water due to dust and leaching loss (Zeng et al., 2008). It is estimated that 30%–88% of the As absorbed by humans is from As-polluted soil (Diazbarriga et al., 1993). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Follow-up investigation on hair arsenic concentration was conducted in an arsenic heavily polluted area of southern China in 2002 and 2006. The results showed that the geometric mean of hair arsenic concentration decreased from 2.95 mg/kg in 2002 to 1.78 mg/kg in 2006, when the percentage of the population with levels over 1 mg/kg only decreased from 93.4% in 2002 to 80.5% in 2006. Over this four-year period, the population with high arsenic concentrations decreased significantly while there was no obvious change in hair arsenic concentration for people who had relatively low concentrations. In terms of age distribution, young and old people had higher hair arsenic concentrations than the middle-aged. All of these results showed that it is difficult to reverse the negative impact of arsenic pollution on human health. Arsenic pollution has a long-term continuous influence on the health of local residents.
    Journal of Environmental Sciences 01/2010; 22(2):283-9. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60106-6 · 2.00 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

25 Reads
Available from