Combined auditory and articulatory training improves phonological deficit in children with dyslexia

University Hospital and Institut de Neuroscience Cognitive de la Mediterranee, Marseille, France.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 1.96). 09/2008; 18(4):402-29. DOI: 10.1080/09602010701529341
Source: PubMed


A group of 19 children with dyslexia aged 7 years 2 months to 10 years 9 months were selected from a clinical sample and tested using a large neuropsychological battery in order to specify the severity and subtype of dyslexia as well as the presence of comorbid conditions. Thereafter, they received a standardised training of 6 weeks of daily auditory exercises aimed at reinforcing explicit and implicit phonological awareness. Ten participants also received specific training of the sensory-motor aspects of articulatory production of individual phonemes during the first 3 weeks of auditory training, whereas the remaining received the same specific training during the last 3 weeks of auditory training. Repetition, phonological awareness, reading and spelling were assessed before the first session, between the two sessions and after the second session. Results confirm the overall efficiency of intensive phonological training, even with exclusively auditory material. The main outcome of this study is a significant improvement of phonology and non-word reading specifically during the periods where the two methods were associated, suggesting a significant contribution of articulatory training to the observed improvement. Finally performance to a motor tapping task proved to be one of the best predictors of training efficiency while comorbid co-ordination or attention deficit did not interfere. Results are interpreted with reference to current theories about mechanisms underlying dyslexia.

13 Reads
  • Source
    • "text to speech) also demonstrates an increase in the dyslexia patient's reading accuracy in terms of comprehension and decoding (Carter et al., 2009). Auditory and articulatory training can help improve the phonology of individuals with dyslexia (Joly-Pottuz et al., 2008). Computer assistance instructional programs such as reading, writing, and translation assistance programs are also known to help improve phonemic awareness, phonemic decoding, reading accuracy, rapid automatic naming, and reading comprehension (Torgesen et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This research defines a ‘Social Reader’ aimed to helpreading by dyslexia patients. Social Reader is capable of creating a socialized reading environment, whereindividuals with dyslexia can seek help from volunteersand other readers while reading e-Books, papers, andnovels. The help can include an explanation of anequation, a page, or a whole chapter. By implementingthe dynamic help between volunteers and readers or justamong the readers, a vivid reading community can beestablished. This well-structured reading community isassumed to help individuals with dyslexia improve theircognitive performance while simultaneously building uptheir self-esteem and self-confidence as they interactwith other individuals with dyslexia. Having low self-esteem is known to severely affect reading, writing, andorganizational skills as well as overall life satisfactionfor individuals with dyslexia. The research focuses on three usability engineeringmethods that assisted in our design. The first method,sensitive persona, captures the empathy of the targetuser’s persona; it can foster the designer’s desire todesign high quality products for end-users. The secondmethod, persona self-guided evaluation, brings theapplication of persona in user centered design not onlyto design but to evaluation, in order to minimize the gapbetween target users and evaluators when two differentgroups are employed. The third method, persona think-aloud evaluation, enhances the traditional think-aloudmethod for user-centered evaluation.By designing Social Reader, design team membersundertook a complete human-centered product designand evaluation life-cycle, including contextual inquiryand analysis, persona creation, wireframe creation, andprototype creation. In each phase of the design process,the concept of a persona was extensively used; inparticular, our persona-based evaluation duringwireframe and prototype creation.In designing the Social Reader for individuals withdyslexia, the design team identified sensitive personacentered design and evaluation, connecting it with thegoals of Kansei and with affective design. An expertevaluation by usability engineers gained a goodprojected acceptance for individuals with dyslexia.
    .keer2012; 01/2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I use Ian Hacking's views to explore ways of classifying people, exploiting his distinction between indifferent kinds and interactive kinds, and his accounts of how we ‘make up’ people. The natural kind/essentialist approach to indifferent kinds is explored in some depth. I relate this to debates in psychiatry about the existence of mental illness, and to educational controversies about the credentials of learner classifications such as ‘dyslexic’. Claims about the ‘existence’ of learning disabilities cannot be given a clear, simple and unambiguous interpretation. In particular I show that science cannot deliver a definitive taxonomy of learner categories, and that this has important implications for teachers and policy makers.
    Journal of Philosophy of Education 11/2008; 42(3‐4):441 - 455. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00637.x · 0.37 Impact Factor
  • Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 10/2010; 42(4):226-240. DOI:10.1026/0049-8637/a000021 · 0.67 Impact Factor
Show more


13 Reads
Available from