Article

Effect of oxygen in obstructive sleep apnea: role of loop gain.

Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (Impact Factor: 1.97). 06/2008; 162(2):144-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.05.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared the effect of oxygen on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in six obstructive sleep apnea patients with a relatively high loop gain (LG) and six with a low LG. LG is a measure of ventilatory control stability. In the high LG group (unstable ventilatory control system), oxygen reduced the LG from 0.69+/-0.18 to 0.34+/-0.04 (p<0.001) and lowered the AHI by 53+/-33% (p=0.04 compared to the percent reduction in the low LG group). In the low LG group (stable ventilatory control system), oxygen had no effect on LG (0.24+/-0.04 on room air, 0.29+/-0.07 on oxygen, p=0.73) and very little effect on AHI (8+/-27% reduction with oxygen). These data suggest that ventilatory instability is an important mechanism causing obstructive sleep apnea in some patients (those with a relatively high LG), since lowering LG with oxygen in these patients significantly reduces AHI.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
97 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder characterized by recurring collapse of the pharyngeal airway leading to restricted airflow. OSA is becoming increasingly common with at least moderate disease now evident in 17% of middle aged men and 9% of women. The list of recognized adverse health consequences associated with OSA is growing and includes daytime symptoms of sleepiness, impaired cognition and risk of motor vehicle accidents as well as associations with hypertension, cardiovascular morbidity, malignancy and all-cause mortality. In this context adequate treatment of OSA is imperative; however, there are well-recognized pitfalls in the uptake and usage of the standard treatment modality, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). A broad range of pathophysiological mechanisms are now recognized beyond an anatomically smaller pharyngeal airway and impaired compensatory pharyngeal muscle responsiveness. Perturbations in ventilatory control stability, low arousal threshold, sleep-related decrease in lung volume and fluid redistribution as well as upper airway surface tension have all been shown to variously contribute to sleep-disordered breathing. Many new therapies are emerging from these advances in understanding of the mechanisms of OSA. Although many may not be universally effective, the promise of phenotyping patients according to their individual pathophysiology in order to target one or more therapies may prove highly effective and allow the treatment of OSA towards a personalized medicine approach.
    Sleep and Biological Rhythms 12/2014; 13(1). DOI:10.1111/sbr.12098 · 1.05 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A strong demand for new obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) therapies exists and several are emerging. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is designed to activate upper airway muscles. The initial study from Inspire (Maple Grove, MN) suggests that the device will work well in a very selective group of OSA patients. However, it is likely to be quite expensive. The Winx device (ApniCure, Redwood City, CA) works by establishing a vacuum in the oral cavity, which pulls the uvula and soft palate forward and stabilizes the tongue position. The current device works in approximately 40% of patients and the early data suggest adherence may be quite good. The Provent device( Theravent, San Jose, CA) has been available for several years and is disposable. It is to be attached to the nares nightly and establishes substantial expiratory resistance. Multiple studies suggest that Provent can successfully treat OSA in about 35 to 50% of the patients. However, acceptance and adherence may be a problem. OSA phenotyping is not a therapy, but a way to determine exactly what causes airway collapse in each patient, which can vary substantially. This may allow for individualization of apnea therapy. New methods to prevent supine sleep and surgically implantable devices to treat OSA are also evolving.
    Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 10/2014; 35(5):621-8. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1390074 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rationale: A low respiratory arousal threshold (ArTH) is one of several traits involved in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathogenesis and may be a therapeutic target; however, there is no simple way to identify patients without invasive measurements. Objectives: To determine the physiological determinates of the ArTH and develop a clinical tool that can identify patients with low ArTH. Methods: Anthropometric data were collected in 146 participants who underwent overnight polysomnography with an epiglottic catheter in order to measure the ArTH (nadir epiglottic pressure prior to arousal). The ArTH was measured from up to 20 NREM and REM respiratory events selected randomly. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the independent predictors of the ArTH. Logistic regression was used to develop a clinical scoring system. Measurements and Main Results: Nadir SpO2, apnea-hypopnea index and the fraction of events that were hypopneas (Fhypopneas) were independent predictors of the ArTH (r2=0.59, p<0.001). Using this information, we used ROC analysis and logistic regression to develop a clinical score to predict a low ArTH, which allocated a score of 1 to each criterion that was satisfied: (AHI<30 events/hr)+(nadir SpO2>82.5%)+(Fhypopneas>58.3%). A score of 2 or above correctly predicted a low arousal threshold in 84.1% of participants with a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 88.0%, a finding which was confirmed using leave-one-out cross validation analysis. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that individuals with a low ArTH can be identified from standard, clinically available variables. This finding could facilitate larger interventional studies targeting the ArTH.
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 10/2014; DOI:10.1164/rccm.201404-0718OC · 11.04 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Mar 2, 2015