Article
A stochastic method for the reconstruction of protein structures from one-dimensional structural profiles.
Institut für Festkörperphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstrasse 6, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.
Gene (impact factor:
2.34).
07/2008;
422(1-2):47-51.
DOI:10.1016/j.gene.2008.06.004
pp.47-51
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Defining an essence of structure determining residue contacts in proteins.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The network of native non-covalent residue contacts determines the three-dimensional structure of a protein. However, not all contacts are of equal structural significance, and little knowledge exists about a minimal, yet sufficient, subset required to define the global features of a protein. Characterisation of this "structural essence" has remained elusive so far: no algorithmic strategy has been devised to-date that could outperform a random selection in terms of 3D reconstruction accuracy (measured as the Ca RMSD). It is not only of theoretical interest (i.e., for design of advanced statistical potentials) to identify the number and nature of essential native contacts-such a subset of spatial constraints is very useful in a number of novel experimental methods (like EPR) which rely heavily on constraint-based protein modelling. To derive accurate three-dimensional models from distance constraints, we implemented a reconstruction pipeline using distance geometry. We selected a test-set of 12 protein structures from the four major SCOP fold classes and performed our reconstruction analysis. As a reference set, series of random subsets (ranging from 10% to 90% of native contacts) are generated for each protein, and the reconstruction accuracy is computed for each subset. We have developed a rational strategy, termed "cone-peeling" that combines sequence features and network descriptors to select minimal subsets that outperform the reference sets. We present, for the first time, a rational strategy to derive a structural essence of residue contacts and provide an estimate of the size of this minimal subset. Our algorithm computes sparse subsets capable of determining the tertiary structure at approximately 4.8 A Ca RMSD with as little as 8% of the native contacts (Ca-Ca and Cb-Cb). At the same time, a randomly chosen subset of native contacts needs about twice as many contacts to reach the same level of accuracy. This "structural essence" opens new avenues in the fields of structure prediction, empirical potentials and docking.PLoS Computational Biology 12/2009; 5(12):e1000584. · 5.22 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
accurate physico-chemical energy function
accurate reconstructions
computational approach
contact map
energy bias
first eigenvector
larger proteins
Monte Carlo simulations
native structure
native structures
protein structure
proteins
small proteins
structural profile
structural profile bias
target structural profile