Article

Coronary Artery Calcium to Predict All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Men and Women

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Impact Factor: 15.34). 07/2008; 52(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to study the prognostic utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the elderly.
The prognostic significance of CAC in the elderly is not well known.
All-cause mortality was assessed in 35,388 patients (3,570 were >or=70 years old at screening, and 50% were women) after a mean follow-up of 5.8 +/- 3 years.
In older patients, risk factors and CAC were more prevalent. Overall survival was 97.9% at the end of follow-up. Mortality increased with each age decile with a relative hazard of 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.10, p < 0.0001), and rates were greater for men than women (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.32 to 1.77, p < 0.0001). Increasing CAC scores were associated with decreasing survival across all age deciles (p < 0.0001). Survival for a <40-year and >or=80-year-old man with a CAC score >or=400 was 88% and 19% (95% and 44% for a woman, p < 0.0001), respectively. Among the 20,562 patients with no CAC, annual mortality rates ranged from 0.3% to 2.2% for patients age 40 to 49 years or >or=70 years (p < 0.0001). The use of CAC allowed us to reclassify more than 40% of the patients >or=70 years old more often by excluding risk (i.e., CAC <400) in those with >3 risk factors.
Despite their limited life expectancy, the use of CAC discriminates mortality risk in the elderly. Furthermore, the use of CAC allows physicians to reclassify risk in the elderly.

0 Followers
 · 
163 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The current guidelines for classifying women into high, intermediate and low risk based on the Framingham Risk Score and National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines are biased against women, deprive many women at risk of coronary heart disease of potentially effective lipid-lowering drug therapy, and likely contribute to a very high prevalence of vascular disease, cognitive disorders, disability, and reduced active life expectancy for women. Prevalence of atherosclerosis beginning early in life, use of noninvasive imaging of atherosclerosis, better measurement of lipoprotein levels, awareness of importance of diseases that increase risk of coronary heart disease among women, and earlier and more frequent use of effective therapies to prevent cardiovascular disease are necessary to greatly improve women’s cardiovascular health. KeywordsRisk factors-Women-Cardiovascular disease-Coronary calcium-Lipid lowering
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 05/2010; 4(3):229-236. DOI:10.1007/s12170-010-0093-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We were asked to address this simple question: should we treat according to the SHAPE (Naghavi Am J Cardiol 98:2H–15H, 2006) guidelines? It sounds like a simple and direct question and yet there are no direct answers. None that would satisfy every reader, at least. SHAPE sounds like a grandiose attempt at rephrasing priorities, and the approach to the diagnosis and therapy of cardiovascular disease; does it not? Or is it a first honest effort at differing from structured and aligned thinkers? The “evidence seized medicine” of the past several decades may have overlooked a lot of common sense, good indirect evidence and a lot of self evident truth that may need to be readdressed. Among the common things one may have forgotten, is the simple tenet that not all humans are born the same (from the genetic point of view, that is); not all diabetic patients have the same risk of coronary artery disease, not all 60-year old black men have the same degree of renal damage after 10 years of systolic hypertension, not everyone suffers the same degree of complications from various ailments or risk factors. So, it may be worth taking an “outside of the box” look while reviewing the SHAPE guidelines (Am J Cardiol 98:2H–15H, 2006), with an open mind toward alternative values inherent in the proposed approach. That is what we set out to do in this brief chapter.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The striking improvement in cardiovascular therapies during the last several decades has caused a marked decrease in mortality linked to atherosclerotic diseases in Western societies. Nonetheless, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the main cause of non-fatal events, and it is associated with substantial functional impairment in survivors of acute events, imposing a very large economic burden on societies. The use of risk scoring tools helps to identify patients both at higher risk of disease and those who are most likely to benefit from therapeutic intervention. Unfortunately, it has become apparent that most of these tools are not completely accurate, and many patients considered to be at low risk suffer coronary events, and, on the contrary, intermediate- to high-risk patients may actually be at a much lower risk than predicted. The attention of several investigators, therefore, turned to the development of imaging tools to identify atherosclerosis or its signature in its pre-clinical stages.
Show more

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from